Add fmt and lint checks#118
Conversation
5732ba9 to
794d24d
Compare
addisonElliott
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks! Getting closer, just some minor nitpicks.
|
@bernardopericacho After this PR, do you think we’re getting close to a v1 release or are there other major changes you had in mind? |
bernardopericacho
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have to rebase the changes from master and apply this again. Hopefully I can do it this weekend
I was thinking about pinging you (somehow) to talk about a couple of things:
|
794d24d to
caaaba1
Compare
|
Sorry for the delay! This fell off my radar.
I personally don't think the API is too confusing right now as is. Plus, I think the examples are verbose & helpful enough that it resolves any potential confusion. I think reading/writing directly to/from files is the majority use-case for this library. Could be wrong here. It saves a few steps of the user having to open the file handle. Also, it allows us to read in detached-header NRRD files when reading by opening the header file for them.
That sounds good to me. I'm a big fan of type hinting.
Yep, that's correct. IIRC, it was necessary so ReadTheDocs would know to download that. I should be able to do this a different way now. |
I did this in #120, so we're good to go there. |
Proposed changes