<cmath>: Use Clang builtins for classification/comparison functions
#4612
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #4609.
This is limited to functions that the UCRT has templated, where our non-template overloads will be preferred. For example, this PR omits
fpclassify()because the UCRT overloads it forfloat,double, andlong double(to call_fdtest(),_dtest(), and_ldtest(), respectively), so even though Clang provides aconstexpr-compatible__builtin_fpclassify, the STL can't provide overloads without introducing ambiguity.Note that we define our overloads in the global namespace and then drag them into
namespace std. Therefore, as long as users include<cmath>, their global namespace calls will benefit from this improvement.Also note an additional limitation: calls to the binary comparison functions with mixed argument types will select the UCRT templates as being better matches.
In the medium future, it looks like we're going to need a major UCRT overhaul of
<math.h>to implement all of theconstexprdemanded by C++23/26 - at that time we can also untangle the additional overloads that the STL is providing (for both integral and floating-point), and teach the UCRT to use MSVC and Clang builtins when possible.The MSVC compiler back-end should probably provide similar builtins - I am a lazy kitty 🐈 💤 so I haven't asked them, but again the upcoming
constexproverhaul work will likely result in such machinery becoming available.Click to expand codegen before:
Click to expand codegen after: