chore(ci): correct stale upload-artifact version comment#2164
Merged
imran-siddique merged 1 commit intoMay 12, 2026
Merged
Conversation
`.github/workflows/weekly-security-audit.yml:74` pins `actions/upload-artifact@043fb46d1a93c77aae656e7c1c64a875d1fc6a0a` but labels the SHA `# v4.6.2`. Every other workflow in the repo pins the same SHA and labels it `# v7.0.1` (verified across `benchmarks.yml`, `ci.yml`, `publish.yml`, `scorecard.yml`). The SHA does resolve to v7.0.1 — confirmed via the upstream tag: `https://api.github.com/repos/actions/upload-artifact/git/refs/tags/v7.0.1` returns this exact SHA. So the runtime behavior is correct; only the comment is stale, presumably from a copy-paste at an earlier bump. Update the comment so Dependabot, reviewers, and future bumps see a consistent v7.0.1 label across the workflow set.
🤖 AI Agent: docs-sync-checker — View detailsDocumentation is in sync. |
🤖 AI Agent: security-scanner — View detailsNo security issues found. |
🤖 AI Agent: breaking-change-detector — View detailsNo breaking changes detected. |
🤖 AI Agent: code-reviewer — View detailsNo issues found. Clean change. |
🤖 AI Agent: test-generator — View detailsTest coverage looks good. No gaps identified. |
|
🟡 Contributor Check: MEDIUM
Automated check by AGT Contributor Check. |
PR Review Summary
Verdict: ✅ Ready for human review |
MohammadHaroonAbuomar
pushed a commit
to MohammadHaroonAbuomar/agt-acs
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 1, 2026
) `.github/workflows/weekly-security-audit.yml:74` pins `actions/upload-artifact@043fb46d1a93c77aae656e7c1c64a875d1fc6a0a` but labels the SHA `# v4.6.2`. Every other workflow in the repo pins the same SHA and labels it `# v7.0.1` (verified across `benchmarks.yml`, `ci.yml`, `publish.yml`, `scorecard.yml`). The SHA does resolve to v7.0.1 — confirmed via the upstream tag: `https://api.github.com/repos/actions/upload-artifact/git/refs/tags/v7.0.1` returns this exact SHA. So the runtime behavior is correct; only the comment is stale, presumably from a copy-paste at an earlier bump. Update the comment so Dependabot, reviewers, and future bumps see a consistent v7.0.1 label across the workflow set.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
.github/workflows/weekly-security-audit.yml:74pinsactions/upload-artifact@043fb46d1a93c77aae656e7c1c64a875d1fc6a0abut labels the SHA# v4.6.2. Every other workflow in the repo pins the same SHA and labels it# v7.0.1:benchmarks.yml:51ci.yml:676publish.yml:152, 216, 337scorecard.yml:31The SHA does resolve to v7.0.1 — confirmed via the upstream tag:
So runtime behavior is correct; only the comment is stale, presumably from a copy-paste at an earlier bump.
Change
Update the comment so Dependabot, reviewers, and future bumps see a consistent
# v7.0.1label across the workflow set. One-character edit.Verification
actionlintparses cleanly (action ref unchanged).Surfaced during independent audit conducted by @finnoybu (Ken Tannenbaum, AEGIS Initiative); [LOW, Infrastructure/CI].