Remove name and title fields from ResourceContents examples in the resources/read response documentation. These fields are part of the Resource type (used in resources/list) but not ResourceContents (used in resources/read), as defined in the schema.

Motivation and Context

Extra fields in the documentation are confusing.

How Has This Been Tested?

N/A

Breaking Changes

N/A

Types of changes

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• Documentation update

Checklist

• I have read the MCP Documentation
• [n/a] My code follows the repository's style guidelines
• [n/a] New and existing tests pass locally
• [n/a] I have added appropriate error handling
• [n/a] I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

N/A