Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

fix(masked_4D_arrays): allow re-use of preceding spd data if empty#2314

Merged
wpbonelli merged 12 commits into
modflowpy:developfrom
martclanor:fix_masked_4d_arrays
Oct 20, 2024
Merged

fix(masked_4D_arrays): allow re-use of preceding spd data if empty#2314
wpbonelli merged 12 commits into
modflowpy:developfrom
martclanor:fix_masked_4d_arrays

Conversation

@martclanor

@martclanor martclanor commented Sep 23, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This PR aims to address the issue raised in discussion #2309

  • fix(MFPandasTransientList.masked_4D_arrays_itr): allow re-use of preceding spd data if empty (mf6)
    • generalize setting of array shape for different grid types
    • re-use preceding spd array data
    • update relevant test
  • fix(MfList.masked_4d_arrays): allow re-use of preceding spd data if empty (non-mf6)
    • generalize setting of array shape for different grid types
    • re-use preceding spd array data
  • fix(model_attributes_to_shapefile): fix exporting of transientlist if disu
    • create separate case for disu
    • update relevant test
  • test(masked_4D_arrays): add tests
    • compare mf6 and non-mf6 shp export (riv data)
  • refactor(MFTransientList): re-use masked_4D_arrays_itr implementation
  • refactor(model_attributes_to_shapefile): remove bare except
  • refactor(model_attributes_to_shapefile): skip transientlist if empty
  • refactor(model_attributes_to_shapefile): skip transientlist if all elements are of object type
    • if package has timeseries data, transientlist elements are all of object type
  • refactor(mflist_export): skip mflist if all elements are of object type
    • if package has timeseries data, mflist elements are all of object type
  • fix(mfUsgDisU): return ncpl as integer
  • refactor(model_attributes_to_shapefile): use first recarray kper to check transientlist
  • refactor(mflist_export): use first recarray kper to check mflist

I did remove the bare except clause in flopy.export.shapefile_utils.model_attributes_to_shapefile but it caused several tests to fail. These issues were addressed in the last commits. However, in hindsight, I'm not sure if that was worth removing.

@martclanor martclanor marked this pull request as ready for review September 23, 2024 15:42
@martclanor martclanor marked this pull request as draft September 26, 2024 07:58
@wpbonelli

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

At least some of the CI failures look like the same thing Josh is running into #2318 (comment). I will patch the get-modflow script shortly

@wpbonelli wpbonelli added this to the 3.9 milestone Oct 10, 2024
@martclanor martclanor force-pushed the fix_masked_4d_arrays branch from b8a8cac to fe21cbd Compare October 19, 2024 19:33
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Oct 19, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 95.23810% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 74.2%. Comparing base (5555d15) to head (fe21cbd).
Report is 13 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
flopy/export/shapefile_utils.py 93.3% 1 Missing ⚠️
flopy/mf6/data/mfdatalist.py 0.0% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop   #2314     +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage     74.3%   74.2%   -0.1%     
=========================================
  Files          294     292      -2     
  Lines        59562   59683    +121     
=========================================
+ Hits         44282   44336     +54     
- Misses       15280   15347     +67     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
flopy/export/utils.py 64.6% <100.0%> (+0.1%) ⬆️
flopy/mf6/data/mfdataplist.py 78.8% <100.0%> (+0.1%) ⬆️
flopy/mfusg/mfusgdisu.py 83.8% <100.0%> (ø)
flopy/utils/util_list.py 75.5% <100.0%> (+<0.1%) ⬆️
flopy/export/shapefile_utils.py 84.0% <93.3%> (+0.2%) ⬆️
flopy/mf6/data/mfdatalist.py 69.0% <0.0%> (+1.8%) ⬆️

... and 16 files with indirect coverage changes

@martclanor martclanor marked this pull request as ready for review October 19, 2024 20:07

@wpbonelli wpbonelli left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks a lot for this @martclanor

@wpbonelli wpbonelli merged commit 332a310 into modflowpy:develop Oct 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants