Backport 12162 to 6.x - #12504
Closed
Trott wants to merge 2 commits into
Closed
Backport 12162 to 6.x#12504Trott wants to merge 2 commits into
Trott wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
2 tasks
Contributor
Member
Author
|
Well that's too bad. I thought I ran the linter to make sure it was working. Guess I did not. |
Trott
force-pushed
the
backport-12162-to-6.x
branch
from
April 19, 2017 22:36
35ccdd7 to
fcc759f
Compare
Member
Author
|
OK, fixed. At least the lint rules are fixed anyway. Sorry about that. |
Contributor
|
Cool. Trying CI one more time.. https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/7541/ |
Member
Author
|
Is the FreeBSD test-net-write-after-close failure a known flaky on the v6.x branch? Seems unrelated to this... |
Contributor
|
@Trott it isn't flaky AFAIK... will run tests again on release branch to check |
MylesBorins
force-pushed
the
v6.x-staging
branch
from
April 24, 2017 17:50
404d1bc to
99dab5b
Compare
Member
Author
Member
Author
|
Only CI failure is build/infra related. |
PR-URL: nodejs#12162 Reviewed-By: Teddy Katz <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
ESLint 3.19.0 allows the specification of selectors that represent disallowed syntax. Replace our custom rule for timer arguments with a pair of `no-restricted-syntax` option objects.
Trott
force-pushed
the
backport-12162-to-6.x
branch
from
April 25, 2017 22:09
fcc759f to
d533e92
Compare
Member
Author
|
CI again post-rebase: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/7679/ |
Member
Author
|
CI looks good. Just the usual clang bot failure on v6.x. (At least, I think it's the usual. Regardless, it's build-related, not related to this change.) |
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 26, 2017
Backport-PR-URL: #12504 PR-URL: #12162 Reviewed-By: Teddy Katz <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 26, 2017
ESLint 3.19.0 allows the specification of selectors that represent disallowed syntax. Replace our custom rule for timer arguments with a pair of `no-restricted-syntax` option objects. PR-URL: #12504 Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <[email protected]>
Contributor
|
landed in 9218661...cf26d15 |
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2017
Backport-PR-URL: #12504 PR-URL: #12162 Reviewed-By: Teddy Katz <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2017
ESLint 3.19.0 allows the specification of selectors that represent disallowed syntax. Replace our custom rule for timer arguments with a pair of `no-restricted-syntax` option objects. PR-URL: #12504 Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <[email protected]>
Merged
andrew749
pushed a commit
to michielbaird/node
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 19, 2017
Backport-PR-URL: nodejs/node#12504 PR-URL: nodejs/node#12162 Reviewed-By: Teddy Katz <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
andrew749
pushed a commit
to michielbaird/node
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 19, 2017
ESLint 3.19.0 allows the specification of selectors that represent disallowed syntax. Replace our custom rule for timer arguments with a pair of `no-restricted-syntax` option objects. PR-URL: nodejs/node#12504 Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <[email protected]>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
backport of #12162 to 6.x
@MylesBorins