quic: fix stall datagrams, if no pending streams - #64303
Merged
Merged
Conversation
If you are only sending datagrams and so streams, your datagrams could stall. There were two reasons: i. A SendPendingDataScope in SendDatagrams was missing. ii. SendPendingData did not attempt to send datagrams, if there were no stream data. Signed-off-by: Marten Richter <[email protected]>
Collaborator
|
Review requested:
|
Contributor
Author
|
This may conflict with the PR of #64234 . The changes of the tests are a bit of a cover up. So suggestions are welcome. The underlying problem is that ngtcp2 does not indicate that instead of a datagram, another packet is sent. (In this case, it is the acknowledgment of the reestablished connection; I have debugged it, and it will run several times to wait for some time to pass.). So also these waiting counts as failure. |
Qard
approved these changes
Jul 5, 2026
jasnell
approved these changes
Jul 5, 2026
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Collaborator
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
Collaborator
|
Landed in af3bbab |
aduh95
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 21, 2026
If you are only sending datagrams and so streams, your datagrams could stall. There were two reasons: i. A SendPendingDataScope in SendDatagrams was missing. ii. SendPendingData did not attempt to send datagrams, if there were no stream data. Signed-off-by: Marten Richter <[email protected]> PR-URL: #64303 Reviewed-By: Stephen Belanger <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
RafaelGSS
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 29, 2026
If you are only sending datagrams and so streams, your datagrams could stall. There were two reasons: i. A SendPendingDataScope in SendDatagrams was missing. ii. SendPendingData did not attempt to send datagrams, if there were no stream data. Signed-off-by: Marten Richter <[email protected]> PR-URL: #64303 Reviewed-By: Stephen Belanger <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
aduh95
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 6, 2026
If you are only sending datagrams and so streams, your datagrams could stall. There were two reasons: i. A SendPendingDataScope in SendDatagrams was missing. ii. SendPendingData did not attempt to send datagrams, if there were no stream data. Signed-off-by: Marten Richter <[email protected]> PR-URL: #64303 Reviewed-By: Stephen Belanger <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If you are only sending datagrams and so streams,
your datagrams could stall.
There were two reasons:
i. A SendPendingDataScope in SendDatagrams was
missing.
ii. SendPendingData did not attempt to send
datagrams, if there was no stream data.
Also two tests needed changes.