You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In Numeric, Int0 is indeed equivalent to Int8. There's no real reason for it to exist at all, though, fixed or unfixed. I don't recommend using it. Or letting its anomalous existence bother you much. :-)
I will close this in favor of the new gh-15334 (renaming it as a documentation and/or deprecation) not that it matters which one is open. Included the info about int8 there.
But if there is no reason for it to exist, can I delete it safely? I don't want things with no purpose even if you want me to keep them if they have no purpose...
Some archaelogy shows that 618a8d4 seems to have taken it from Numeric, which provided
Int0
.Numeric's
IntN
seemed to mean meaning C99sint_leastN_t
, suggesting thatInt0
should besigned char
.So why is
np.int0
an alias ofnp.intp
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: