Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

[full-ci] add one more TUS test to expected to fail file#489

Merged
individual-it merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
check-for-without-remote-php-bug
Mar 26, 2025
Merged

[full-ci] add one more TUS test to expected to fail file#489
individual-it merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
check-for-without-remote-php-bug

Conversation

@individual-it

@individual-it individual-it commented Mar 26, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

This test somehow was missing in the list, but fails for the same reason. It was not discovered because we do not run full-ci very frequently

Motivation and Context

fix full-ci runs

How Has This Been Tested?

🤖

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Technical debt
  • Tests only (no source changes)

Checklist:

  • Code changes
  • Unit tests added
  • Acceptance tests added
  • Documentation added

@individual-it individual-it force-pushed the check-for-without-remote-php-bug branch from 7d0b13d to 495f5eb Compare March 26, 2025 09:28
@individual-it individual-it changed the title [full-ci] trigger CI [full-ci] add one more TUS test to expected to fail file Mar 26, 2025
@individual-it individual-it marked this pull request as ready for review March 26, 2025 09:32
@individual-it individual-it force-pushed the check-for-without-remote-php-bug branch from 495f5eb to 5561d5f Compare March 26, 2025 10:15
@individual-it individual-it merged commit e4402d9 into main Mar 26, 2025
@individual-it individual-it deleted the check-for-without-remote-php-bug branch March 26, 2025 11:30
@openclouders openclouders mentioned this pull request Mar 26, 2025
1 task
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants