G-API: Make test execution lighter (first attempt) #25060
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Marked some outliers as `verylong`: - OneVPL barrier test - pure brute force - Stateful test in stream - in fact BG Sub accuracy test clone - Restructured parameters instantiation in Streaming tests to generate less test configurations (54 -> 36)
Contributor
Author
|
Okey dokey here's first results, before: https://github.com/opencv/opencv/actions/runs/7988786908/job/21814098436 after: https://github.com/opencv/opencv/actions/runs/7988920497/job/21814498159?pr=25060 Nearly the 40% time reduction. I will check how the profile looks after than and move forward. |
Contributor
Author
|
Updated stats - after the first attempt - now it is something we can work with: Notably, the top-20 tests consume 100s of 175s total (roughly 60% of all time).
|
Contributor
Contributor
Author
|
@asmorkalov we discussed locally with @TolyaTalamanov and he was ok with the Streaming test change; so I believe this one can merged to help the CI (I will continue the work in other PRs) |
Merged
klatism
pushed a commit
to klatism/opencv
that referenced
this pull request
May 17, 2024
G-API: Make test execution lighter (first attempt) opencv#25060 ### Background G-API tests look running longer than tests for the rest of modules (e.g., 5m), and the analysis show that there's several outliers in G-API test suite which take a lot of time but don't improve the testing quality much:  In this PR I will cut the execution time to something reasonable. ### Contents - Marked some outliers as `verylong`: - OneVPL barrier test - pure brute force - Stateful test in stream - in fact BG Sub accuracy test clone - Restructured parameters instantiation in Streaming tests to generate less test configurations (54 -> 36) ### Pull Request Readiness Checklist See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request - [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License. - [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV - [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch - [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work - [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name. - [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Background
G-API tests look running longer than tests for the rest of modules (e.g., 5m), and the analysis show that there's several outliers in G-API test suite which take a lot of time but don't improve the testing quality much:
In this PR I will cut the execution time to something reasonable.
Contents
verylong:Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.