-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 56.4k
Tests for cvSmooth -> tests for boxFilter #25634
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
asmorkalov
approved these changes
May 24, 2024
Contributor
asmorkalov
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
Merged
savuor
added a commit
to savuor/opencv
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 5, 2024
Tests for cvSmooth -> tests for boxFilter opencv#25634 fixes opencv#25448 ### Motivation The obsolete function `cvSmooth` has two modes in which it calls `cv::boxFilter()` inside with and without normalization. This function is covered by tests exactly for that modes. This means that by replacing `cvSmooth` call by `cv::boxFilter()` we will leave the coverage untouched (but more obvious) and remove that obsolete function from tests. ### Pull Request Readiness Checklist See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request - [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License. - [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV - [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch - [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work - [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name. - [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
savuor
added a commit
to savuor/opencv
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 8, 2024
Tests for cvSmooth -> tests for boxFilter opencv#25634 fixes opencv#25448 ### Motivation The obsolete function `cvSmooth` has two modes in which it calls `cv::boxFilter()` inside with and without normalization. This function is covered by tests exactly for that modes. This means that by replacing `cvSmooth` call by `cv::boxFilter()` we will leave the coverage untouched (but more obvious) and remove that obsolete function from tests. ### Pull Request Readiness Checklist See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request - [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License. - [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV - [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch - [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work - [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name. - [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
savuor
added a commit
to savuor/opencv
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 21, 2024
Tests for cvSmooth -> tests for boxFilter opencv#25634 fixes opencv#25448 ### Motivation The obsolete function `cvSmooth` has two modes in which it calls `cv::boxFilter()` inside with and without normalization. This function is covered by tests exactly for that modes. This means that by replacing `cvSmooth` call by `cv::boxFilter()` we will leave the coverage untouched (but more obvious) and remove that obsolete function from tests. ### Pull Request Readiness Checklist See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request - [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License. - [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV - [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch - [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work - [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name. - [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
fixes #25448
Motivation
The obsolete function
cvSmoothhas two modes in which it callscv::boxFilter()inside with and without normalization.This function is covered by tests exactly for that modes.
This means that by replacing
cvSmoothcall bycv::boxFilter()we will leave the coverage untouched (but more obvious) and remove that obsolete function from tests.Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.