fix(e2e): [time-line] Fixing Test Cases #2407
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the CSS property expectations in the test file Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/time-line/status.spec.ts (1)
45-54: LGTM: Type property tests are well-structuredThe color updates for different states are consistent and well-defined. However, consider extracting the color values into constants at the top of the file to make updates easier and ensure consistency.
+ const Colors = { + PRIMARY: 'rgb(194, 194, 194)', + SUCCESS: 'rgb(92, 179, 0)', + WARNING: 'rgb(255, 136, 0)', + DANGER: 'rgb(242, 48, 48)', + INFO: 'rgb(20, 118, 255)' + }; test('type属性设置节点状态', async ({ page }) => { // ... existing code ... - await expect(timelineItems.first().locator('.dot')).toHaveCSS('background-color', 'rgb(194, 194, 194)') + await expect(timelineItems.first().locator('.dot')).toHaveCSS('background-color', Colors.PRIMARY) // Apply similar changes for other color assertions
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/time-line/status.spec.ts (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/time-line/status.spec.ts (4)
13-14: LGTM: Default state color updates align with design systemThe changes to more neutral grays (border: rgb(219, 219, 219), text: rgb(128, 128, 128)) appear to be part of a design system update for better visual hierarchy.
23-23: LGTM: Warning and error states follow conventional color codingThe updated colors for warning (orange) and error (red) states follow standard conventions and maintain good contrast ratios.
Also applies to: 28-29
33-34: Verify contrast ratio for disabled stateWhile the disabled state colors are visually appropriate, please ensure the contrast ratio between the text (rgb(194, 194, 194)) and background (rgb(240, 240, 240)) meets WCAG accessibility standards.
Consider using a color contrast checker or design system tokens that are pre-verified for accessibility compliance.
18-19: Verify success state color change from blue to blackThe success state color has been changed from blue (rgb(94, 124, 224)) to near-black (rgb(25, 25, 25)). This seems unusual as success states typically use colors that are distinctly different from the default state for better visual feedback.
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
These changes improve the overall user experience by ensuring that the timeline accurately reflects item statuses through consistent and clear visual cues.