Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

fix(demos): [select,popeditor,slider] fix problem and optimization demo #2435

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 28, 2024

Conversation

MomoPoppy
Copy link
Collaborator

@MomoPoppy MomoPoppy commented Oct 28, 2024

PR

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • The commit message follows our Commit Message Guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Increased the width of the ID column in various components to improve data visibility.
    • Enhanced interactivity and usability in the select component with new props for searchable functionality and dynamic filtering.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved tooltip visibility and hover state management in the select component.
  • Style
    • Updated padding properties for search items in the Popeditor component using CSS variables for better flexibility.
  • Documentation
    • Added new CSS variables and modifier classes to enhance styling options for select and Popeditor components.

@MomoPoppy MomoPoppy changed the title Momo poppy/fix bugs 1025 fix(demos): [select,popeditor,slider] fix problem and optimization demo Oct 28, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the bug Something isn't working label Oct 28, 2024
Copy link

[e2e-test-warn]
The component to be tested is missing.

The title of the Pull request should look like "fix(vue-renderless): [action-menu, alert] fix xxx bug".

Please make sure you've read our contributing guide

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 28, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications across multiple Vue component files, primarily focusing on updating the width property of the id column in the gridOp object from 40 to 50. This change affects the layout of various grids displayed by the tiny-popeditor component, enhancing the visual representation of data without altering the underlying logic or functionality of the components.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/*.vue Updated width of id column in gridOp from 40 to 50 in multiple components.
packages/renderless/src/guide/index.ts Added beforeUnmount function to manage tour visibility on component unmount.
packages/renderless/src/guide/vue.ts Updated renderless function to include onBeforeUnmount for cleanup logic.
packages/theme/src/option/index.less Modified .selected state styling to exclude .tiny-option_all from being styled as selected.
packages/theme/src/popeditor/index.less Updated padding properties for search items to use CSS variables for flexibility.
packages/theme/src/popeditor/vars.less Added new CSS variables for padding of search items in pop-up editor.
packages/theme/src/select/index.less Introduced new modifier classes for mini, medium, and small variants of the select component.
packages/theme/src/select/vars.less Added new CSS variable for padding in mini variant of the select component.
packages/vue/src/select/src/pc.vue Enhanced template and logic for rendering select component, including new props for functionality.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • zzcr
  • gimmyhehe

Poem

🐇 In the meadow, bright and wide,
The grids now have a roomier side.
With widths increased, they stand so tall,
A popeditor's charm, admired by all.
So hop along, let's take a look,
At our new layout, like a storybook! 📚✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@zzcr zzcr merged commit e1e2841 into opentiny:dev Oct 28, 2024
9 of 12 checks passed
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 7

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (27)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/textField-composition-api.vue (1)

Line range hint 8-63: Consider adding type definitions for the dataset.

While the code works correctly, adding TypeScript interfaces or PropTypes for the dataset structure would improve maintainability and provide better IDE support.

interface DataItem {
  id: string
  name: string
  city: string
  province: string
}

const dataset: DataItem[] = [
  // ... existing data
]
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/trigger-composition-api.vue (1)

Line range hint 15-106: Consider extracting data and column configurations.

To improve maintainability and reusability, consider:

  1. Moving the dataset to a separate data file
  2. Creating a shared column configuration that can be reused across popeditor components

Example structure:

// data/companies.ts
export const companiesData = [
  {
    id: '1',
    name: 'GFD科技YX公司',
    // ...
  },
  // ...
]

// configs/popeditor-columns.ts
export const defaultColumns = [
  {
    field: 'id',
    title: 'ID',
    width: 50
  },
  // ...
]

This would make it easier to maintain consistent configurations across all popeditor components and centralize any future column width adjustments.

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/before-close-composition-api.vue (1)

Line range hint 1-116: Consider documenting grid layout specifications.

While the width change is straightforward, consider adding documentation about grid layout specifications (minimum widths, responsive behavior, etc.) to maintain consistency in future modifications.

Consider adding a comment block above the gridOp definition explaining the layout guidelines:

+// Grid Layout Guidelines:
+// - ID column: Fixed 50px width for consistent display
+// - Name column: Flexible width with overflow handling
+// - Location columns: Fixed 80px width for compact display
 const gridOp = ref({
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/clearable-composition-api.vue (1)

84-84: Consider adding visual regression tests.

Since this change affects the UI layout, it would be beneficial to add visual regression tests to ensure the grid renders correctly with the new column width and to prevent future regressions.

Would you like help setting up visual regression tests for this component? We can create a new issue to track this enhancement.

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/resize-composition-api.vue (1)

77-77: LGTM! Consider documenting width requirements.

The width increase from 40px to 50px for the ID column seems reasonable, especially when considering padding and potential UI elements like sorting icons.

Consider adding a comment documenting the minimum width requirements for the ID column to prevent future regressions. For example:

 {
   field: 'id',
   title: 'ID',
+  // Minimum 50px to accommodate single-digit IDs, padding, and sorting icons
   width: 50
 },
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/auto-lookup-composition-api.vue (1)

Line range hint 63-85: Consider adding documentation for the demo implementation.

The remoteSearch function uses random data generation and a 500ms delay to simulate real API calls. Consider adding comments to explain:

  • This is a demo implementation
  • The purpose of the 500ms delay (simulating network latency)
  • The random data generation logic

Example documentation:

 function remoteSearch({ page }) {
+  // Demo implementation: Generates random company data to simulate API response
   const randomAlphabets = () => {
     return Array.from({ length: 5 })
       .map(() => String.fromCharCode(65 + Math.floor(26 * Math.random())))
       .join('')
   }
   const { currentPage, pageSize } = page
   const data = Array.from({ length: page.pageSize }).map((item, i) => {
     return {
       id: pageSize * (currentPage - 1) + i + 1,
       name: randomAlphabets() + 'YX公司',
       city: ['福州', '深圳', '中山', '龙岩', '韶关', '黄冈', '赤壁', '厦门'][Math.floor(Math.random() * 8)],
       employees: Math.ceil(Math.random() * 10000)
     }
   })
   return new Promise((resolve) => {
+    // Simulate network latency
     setTimeout(() => {
       resolve({ data, total: 200 })
     }, 500)
   })
 }
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/before-reset-composition-api.vue (1)

85-85: Consider adding a comment explaining the width requirement.

To prevent future regressions, it would be helpful to document why 50px was chosen as the optimal width for the ID column.

     {
       field: 'id',
       title: 'ID',
-      width: 50
+      width: 50, // Minimum width to properly display all ID values without truncation
     },
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/multi-composition-api.vue (1)

Line range hint 1-140: Fix duplicate entries in the dataset.

The dataset contains duplicate entries:

  • Records with id '7' and '9' are identical
  • Records with id '8' and '10' are identical

This could lead to unexpected behavior in selection and display, especially when using the ID field as a unique identifier.

Apply this diff to remove the duplicates:

  {
    id: '8',
    name: '深圳市福德宝网络技术YX公司',
    province: '广东',
    city: '深圳'
  },
-  {
-    id: '9',
-    name: 'KBG物业YX公司',
-    city: '赤壁',
-    province: '武汉'
-  },
-  {
-    id: '10',
-    name: '深圳市福德宝网络技术YX公司',
-    province: '广东',
-    city: '深圳'
-  }
packages/theme/src/popeditor/vars.less (1)

42-45: Consider adding English translations for comments.

While the Chinese comments maintain consistency with existing ones, consider adding English translations to improve maintainability for international contributors.

Example:

-  // 弹出表格搜索项右侧内间距
+  // 弹出表格搜索项右侧内间距
+  // Right padding for popup table search items
   --tv-Popeditor-search-item-padding-right: var(--tv-space-sm, 4px);
-  // 弹出表格搜索项左侧内间距
+  // 弹出表格搜索项左侧内间距
+  // Left padding for popup table search items
   --tv-Popeditor-search-item-padding-left: var(--tv-space-sm, 4px);
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/render-text-composition-api.vue (1)

25-25: Consider adding a comment explaining the width requirement.

To prevent future regressions, it would be helpful to document why 50 was chosen as the optimal width for the ID column.

     {
       field: 'id',
       title: 'ID',
-      width: 50
+      // Minimum width needed to prevent ID truncation
+      width: 50
     },
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/remote-search.vue (1)

29-29: LGTM! Consider documenting width requirements.

The width increase from 40 to 50 pixels for the ID column is consistent with similar changes across other files and should better accommodate 3-digit IDs without truncation.

Consider adding a comment in the documentation about minimum recommended column widths for different data types to help prevent similar issues in the future.

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/pager-composition-api.vue (1)

Line range hint 52-52: Improve pagination implementation.

The current implementation has several issues:

  1. The handlePageChange function is called immediately with an argument that's never used
  2. The function loads all 10 items at once, ignoring the pageSize: 4 configuration
  3. There's no actual pagination logic despite the @page-change event binding

Consider implementing proper pagination:

-handlePageChange(1)
+// Initialize with first page
+handlePageChange(1)

-function handlePageChange() {
+function handlePageChange(page) {
   const dataset = [
     // ... dataset items ...
   ]
-  gridOp.value.data = dataset
+  const startIndex = (page - 1) * gridOp.value.pagerOp.pageSize
+  const endIndex = startIndex + gridOp.value.pagerOp.pageSize
+  gridOp.value.data = dataset.slice(startIndex, endIndex)
 }

Also applies to: 89-89

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/disabled.vue (1)

Line range hint 1-116: Consider updating documentation for UI changes.

Since this appears to be part of a larger pattern of width adjustments across the popeditor component examples, it would be helpful to document this change in the component's documentation or changelog.

Would you like me to help draft documentation updates for these UI changes?

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/title.vue (1)

90-90: Consider documenting standard column widths.

Since this width standardization is being applied across multiple files, consider adding documentation about standard column widths in the component's design guidelines to prevent future inconsistencies.

Would you like me to help create a documentation template for standard column widths?

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/tabindex-composition-api.vue (1)

Line range hint 1-16: Consider enhancing keyboard navigation accessibility.

While the tabindex implementation is good, consider adding aria-label attributes to both popeditor instances to improve screen reader support. This would help users distinguish between the two editors when navigating via keyboard.

Example enhancement:

 <tiny-popeditor
   v-model="value1"
   tabindex="-1"
+  aria-label="First company selector"
   :readonly="false"
   :grid-op="gridOp"
   text-field="name"
   value-field="id"
 ></tiny-popeditor>
 <tiny-popeditor
   v-model="value2"
   tabindex="0"
+  aria-label="Second company selector"
   :readonly="false"
   :grid-op="gridOp"
   text-field="name"
   value-field="id"
 ></tiny-popeditor>
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/auto-reset.vue (1)

90-90: Consider documenting the standard column widths.

Since this appears to be part of a standardization effort across multiple components, it would be helpful to document these standard widths in the component's documentation.

Consider adding a comment above the columns configuration or updating the component's documentation to specify the standard widths for common columns (ID: 50px, Province/City: 80px, etc.).

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/render-text.vue (1)

Line range hint 1-91: Consider enhancing the component's accessibility and user experience.

While reviewing the component, I noticed some potential improvements:

  1. Add aria-labels or tooltips for better accessibility
  2. Consider adding loading states during remote operations
  3. Add error handling for failed remote operations

Here's a suggested enhancement for the remoteSearch implementation:

    remoteSearch({ page }) {
+     this.$emit('loading', true)
      const randomAlphabets = () => {
        return Array.from({ length: 5 })
          .map(() => String.fromCharCode(65 + Math.floor(26 * Math.random())))
          .join('')
      }
      const { currentPage, pageSize } = page
      const data = Array.from({ length: page.pageSize }).map((item, i) => {
        return {
          id: pageSize * (currentPage - 1) + i + 1,
          name: randomAlphabets() + 'YX公司',
          city: ['福州', '深圳', '中山', '龙岩', '韶关', '黄冈', '赤壁', '厦门'][Math.floor(Math.random() * 8)],
          employees: Math.ceil(Math.random() * 10000)
        }
      })

      return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
        setTimeout(() => {
+         try {
            resolve({ data, total: 200 })
+         } catch (error) {
+           reject(error)
+         } finally {
+           this.$emit('loading', false)
+         }
        }, 500)
      })
    }

And update the template to handle loading states:

 <tiny-popeditor
   multi
   :remote-search="remoteSearch"
   :text-render-source="renderText"
   v-model="value"
   show-pager
   :grid-op="gridOp"
   text-field="name"
   value-field="id"
   :conditions="conditions"
+  @loading="handleLoading"
+  aria-label="Company Selection Editor"
 ></tiny-popeditor>
packages/theme/src/select/vars.less (1)

44-44: Consider documenting the asymmetric padding choice.

The variable uses asymmetric padding (1px top/bottom, 2px left, 0px right) which differs from the regular tags padding pattern. Consider adding a comment explaining the design decision behind this specific padding configuration for the mini variant.

  // 标签区域内边距(mini)
+ // Note: Asymmetric padding optimized for mini variant to ensure compact layout
  --tv-Select-tags-padding-mini: 1px 0 1px var(--tv-space-xs, 2px);
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/size-composition-api.vue (1)

Line range hint 1-143: Consider adding visual regression tests.

Since this change affects the visual layout of the popeditor component across multiple examples, it would be beneficial to add visual regression tests to ensure consistent rendering across different sizes.

Would you like me to help create visual regression tests for the popeditor component sizes?

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/suggest-composition-api.vue (1)

Line range hint 14-137: Consider adding TypeScript interfaces for better type safety.

While not directly related to the current change, the dataset and associated structures (conditions, gridOp) would benefit from TypeScript interfaces to ensure type safety and improve maintainability.

Example type definitions:

interface Company {
  id: string
  name: string
  city: string
  province: string
}

interface Condition {
  label: string
  field: keyof Company
}

interface GridColumn {
  field: keyof Company
  title: string
  width?: number
}
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/events-composition-api.vue (1)

Line range hint 132-140: Consider removing setTimeout and adding i18n support.

The event handling implementation is clean, but there are two potential improvements:

  1. The setTimeout with 0ms delay in handlePopup appears unnecessary and could be removed
  2. Consider using i18n for Modal messages to support internationalization

Here's how you could simplify the handlePopup function:

 function handlePopup() {
-  setTimeout(() => {
-    Modal.message({
-      message: 'popup 弹窗打开事件',
-      status: 'info'
-    })
-  }, 0)
+  Modal.message({
+    message: 'popup 弹窗打开事件',
+    status: 'info'
+  })
 }
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/condition-layout.vue (1)

Line range hint 56-73: Consider applying consistent labelPosition across conditions.

The labelPosition: 'left' is set for the city condition but missing for the employee condition. For consistent layout, consider applying the same positioning to both.

Apply this diff to maintain consistency:

        {
          label: '员工',
          field: 'employees',
          span: 6,
          labelWidth: '50px',
+         labelPosition: 'left',
          component: hooks.markRaw(Numeric)
        }
packages/theme/src/option/index.less (1)

83-85: Consider adding a comment to explain the selector's purpose.

The complex selector would benefit from a comment explaining why .tiny-option_all needs to be excluded from the selected state styling.

Add a comment like this:

+  // Exclude the "select all" option and options with checkboxes from selected text color styling
   &:not(.tiny-option_all):not(:has(.tiny-option__checkbox-wrap)).selected {
     color: var(--tv-Option-text-color-selected);
   }
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/size.vue (1)

Line range hint 1-144: Consider adding visual regression tests.

Since this component demonstrates different size variants and the change affects the layout, it would be beneficial to add visual regression tests to catch any unintended layout changes in future updates.

Would you like me to help create visual regression tests for this component? We can use tools like Cypress or Storybook to capture and compare screenshots across different size variants.

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/slot-composition-api.vue (1)

Line range hint 1-144: Consider enhancing the search functionality.

While the current implementation works, the search functionality could be improved:

  1. The search params could benefit from type definitions
  2. The search operation could include debouncing for better performance

Consider applying these improvements:

+ import { debounce } from '@opentiny/vue-renderless/common/deps/lodash'
+ import type { Ref } from 'vue'

+ interface SearchParams {
+   name: string
+   city: string
+ }

- const params = ref({
+ const params: Ref<SearchParams> = ref({
   name: '',
   city: ''
 })

+ // Debounced search function
+ const handleSearch = debounce((searchOp, params) => {
+   searchOp.doSearch(params)
+ }, 300)

Then update the search button click handler:

- <tiny-button type="primary" @click="slotScope.searchOp.doSearch(params)">Search</tiny-button>
+ <tiny-button type="primary" @click="handleSearch(slotScope.searchOp, params)">Search</tiny-button>
packages/renderless/src/guide/index.ts (1)

65-67: Add null check for state.tour.

While the cleanup logic is good, we should add a null check to prevent potential runtime errors.

 export const beforeUnmount = (state) => () => {
-  state.tour.hide()
+  state.tour?.hide()
 }
packages/theme/src/select/index.less (1)

103-111: Consider using a CSS variable for the tag height.

While the implementation is good, the hardcoded height value of 18px for .tiny-tag should be moved to a CSS variable for better maintainability and consistency with the design system.

 &--mini {
   .@{select-prefix-cls}__tags {
     padding: var(--tv-Select-tags-padding-mini);

     .tiny-tag {
-      height: 18px;
+      height: var(--tv-Select-tag-height-mini);
     }
   }
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d2197c3 and 8fc1904.

📒 Files selected for processing (80)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/auto-lookup-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/auto-lookup.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/auto-reset-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/auto-reset.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/basic-usage-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/basic-usage.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/before-close-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/before-close.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/before-reset-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/before-reset.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/clearable-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/clearable.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/condition-form-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/condition-form.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/condition-layout-composition-api.vue (3 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/condition-layout.vue (3 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/conditions-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/conditions.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/disabled-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/disabled.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/draggable-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/draggable.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/events-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/events.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/grid-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/grid.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/icon-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/icon.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/multi-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/multi-value-array-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/multi-value-array.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/multi.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/pager-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/pager.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/radio-change-close-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/radio-change-close.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/readonly-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/readonly.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/remote-search-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/remote-search.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/render-text-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/render-text.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/resize-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/resize.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/selected-box-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/selected-box.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/show-clear-btn-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/show-clear-btn.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/show-history-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/show-history.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/show-overflow-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/show-overflow.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/size-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/size.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/slot-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/slot-footer-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/slot-footer.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/slot.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/suggest-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/suggest.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/tabindex-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/tabindex.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/textField-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/textField.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/title-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/title.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/trigger-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/trigger.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/width-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/width.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/slider/max-min-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/slider/max-min.vue (1 hunks)
  • packages/renderless/src/guide/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/renderless/src/guide/vue.ts (2 hunks)
  • packages/theme/src/option/index.less (1 hunks)
  • packages/theme/src/popeditor/index.less (1 hunks)
  • packages/theme/src/popeditor/vars.less (1 hunks)
  • packages/theme/src/select/index.less (3 hunks)
  • packages/theme/src/select/vars.less (1 hunks)
  • packages/vue/src/select/src/pc.vue (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/condition-form.vue
🔇 Additional comments (92)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/slider/max-min-composition-api.vue (2)

2-2: Verify the intentional restriction of slider range.

The slider's range has been significantly restricted from 0-100 to 30-70. While the implementation is technically correct, this represents a significant change in functionality.

Please confirm:

  1. Is this range restriction intentional?
  2. Have all dependent components been updated to handle this restricted range?
  3. Has the documentation been updated to reflect these new limits?

Line range hint 9-9: LGTM: Initial value properly aligned with min bound.

The initial value (30) is correctly set to match the minimum bound of the slider, preventing any initialization issues.

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/slider/max-min.vue (2)

2-2: Verify the rationale for restricting slider range.

The slider range has been significantly restricted from 0-100 to 30-70. While the implementation is technically correct, this is a potentially breaking change that might affect existing implementations.

Please confirm:

  1. Is this range restriction a deliberate UX decision?
  2. Have all consumers of this component been updated to handle the new restricted range?
  3. Should we consider adding props to make these bounds configurable instead of hardcoding them?

Line range hint 13-15: LGTM! Initial value properly aligned with new minimum.

The initial value has been correctly updated to 30 to match the new minimum bound, preventing any invalid initial states.

packages/renderless/src/guide/vue.ts (3)

1-1: LGTM: Import changes are consistent with the new lifecycle hook.

The addition of beforeUnmount import aligns with the new cleanup functionality being added.


5-10: LGTM: Function signature properly updated for lifecycle hook.

The addition of onBeforeUnmount follows Vue.js composition API conventions and is correctly placed with other lifecycle hooks.


40-41: LGTM: Lifecycle hook properly registered.

The onBeforeUnmount hook is correctly registered and follows the established pattern in the component.

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/grid-composition-api.vue (1)

78-78: Verify the necessity of increased column width.

The current dataset shows IDs from 1-10, which should fit comfortably in a 40px column. Please verify if there are use cases requiring the extra width.

✅ Verification successful

Let me search for other patterns of ID usage, including numeric IDs without quotes and different data structures.


The 50px width for the ID column is justified

After analyzing the codebase, the increased width is appropriate because:

  • The dataset shows IDs up to 3 digits (e.g., ID: 100, 411, 421)
  • The component is used in tree structures where IDs like 411, 421 appear frequently
  • The ID column needs to accommodate both the content and some padding for readability
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for patterns of ID usage across the codebase to verify if there are cases with longer IDs
rg -g '*.{vue,js,ts}' -B 2 -A 2 '"id":\s*"[0-9]{3,}"' || echo "No long IDs found in the codebase"

Length of output: 132


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for ID patterns in the specific file and its related components
rg -g '*.{vue,js,ts}' -B 2 -A 2 'id:?\s*\d+' examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

# Check the actual data being used in the grid
cat examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/grid-composition-api.vue

Length of output: 18516

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/textField-composition-api.vue (1)

78-78: LGTM! Verify consistent width across all popeditor demos.

The width adjustment from 40 to 50 for the ID column is appropriate and aligns with the changes across other popeditor examples.

Let's verify the consistency of this change across all popeditor demos:

✅ Verification successful

Width consistency verified across all popeditor demos

The search results confirm that all ID column widths in popeditor demos are consistently set to 50, including both composition API and options API versions. The change aligns perfectly across the entire demo suite.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify ID column width consistency across all popeditor demos
# Expected: All ID column widths should be 50

rg -U --multiline 'field: .id.,\s+title: .ID.,\s+width: \d+' examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

Length of output: 17201

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/disabled-composition-api.vue (1)

84-84: LGTM, but please verify ID column width requirements.

The increase in width from 40px to 50px for the ID column appears to be a reasonable fix for potential text truncation issues. However, please verify that 50px is sufficient for all possible ID values in production, not just the sample data shown here (which only contains IDs 1-10).

Let's check other files in the codebase for ID patterns:

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/readonly-composition-api.vue (2)

84-84: LGTM! Width adjustment aligns with standardization.

The change from 40px to 50px for the ID column width maintains consistency with similar changes across other components in this PR.


84-84: Verify visual impact of the width change.

Please ensure that:

  1. The 50px width adequately displays all possible ID values without truncation
  2. The wider column doesn't cause layout issues in responsive views
✅ Verification successful

Based on the search results, I can see that the IDs in the dataset are all single or double digit numbers (1-10 in most examples, with a few tree examples having IDs up to 100). The width of 50 pixels should be adequate since:

  1. The longest ID value found is 3 digits (100)
  2. Using standard font sizes, 50 pixels is sufficient to display 3 digits without truncation
  3. The width is specifically for the ID column which is typically narrow in data tables
  4. The examples show consistent usage of this width across multiple demo files

The width of 50px is appropriate for the ID column.

  • The width provides enough space for all possible ID values in the dataset
  • It maintains a compact layout while ensuring readability
  • It follows the pattern seen across multiple example files in the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any ID fields in the dataset across all components to verify max ID length
rg -U "id: '[0-9]+'" --type vue

Length of output: 67


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any ID fields in the dataset using a more generic pattern
rg -U "id:.*[0-9]+" -A 2 examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

# Also check for any mock data or dataset definitions
rg -U "const.*data.*=.*\[" -A 10 examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

Length of output: 220958

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/show-clear-btn-composition-api.vue (1)

84-84: LGTM! Consider verifying the width for all ID formats.

The increase in ID column width from 40px to 50px improves UI consistency across components. However, please verify that 50px is sufficient for all possible ID formats in your dataset, especially if IDs can be longer than two digits or use different formats.

Let's check the ID formats across the codebase:

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/title-composition-api.vue (1)

85-85: LGTM! Column width standardization looks good.

The increase in the ID column width from 40 to 50 pixels aligns with the standardization effort across other popeditor components, ensuring consistent grid layouts.

Let's verify this standardization across other similar files:

✅ Verification successful

Width standardization is complete and consistent

The verification confirms that all 50 popeditor components in the codebase consistently use a width of 50 pixels for their ID columns, showing successful standardization across both regular and composition API variants.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all popeditor grid configurations use the same ID column width

# Test: Search for ID column width definitions in popeditor components
# Expect: All should show width: 50
rg -U "field: 'id'[^}]+width: \d+" "examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor"

Length of output: 17180

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/width-composition-api.vue (2)

86-86: LGTM! Width adjustment appears to fix column sizing issue.

The increase in the ID column width from 40 to 50 pixels should provide better visibility for the ID values while maintaining the overall grid layout.


86-86: Verify consistent width updates across related files.

This change appears to be part of a larger pattern of ID column width adjustments.

✅ Verification successful

Let me search for the width configurations in these files to verify if they are consistent.


Width configuration is consistent across all popeditor demo files

The ID column width is consistently set to 50 pixels across all popeditor demo files, both in regular Vue and Composition API versions. This matches the width value in the file under review.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all popeditor demo files have consistent ID column width

# Search for ID column width configurations in popeditor demo files
echo "Checking ID column width configurations in popeditor demos:"
rg -A 1 'field: .id.' examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

Length of output: 11938


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for width configurations in popeditor demo files
echo "Checking width configurations in popeditor demos:"
rg -B 2 -A 2 'width:.*\d+' examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

Length of output: 85615

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/remote-search-composition-api.vue (1)

24-24: LGTM! Consistent width adjustment for better visual display.

The increase in ID column width from 40 to 50 aligns with similar changes across other components and should improve the display of ID values.

Let's verify this change improves the layout across different scenarios:

✅ Verification successful

Width change is part of a consistent update across all popeditor components

The search results confirm that:

  • All popeditor components in the codebase have been updated to use width: 50
  • The change is part of a systematic update from the previous value of 40 (seen in form components) to 50 for all popeditor ID columns
  • The modification maintains consistency across both regular and composition API variants of the components
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if this width change is consistent across all popeditor examples
# and if there are any related visual layout comments in issues

# Test 1: Check for any other width definitions for ID columns
rg -l "field:\s*['\"]id['\"].*width:" --type vue

# Test 2: Look for any related visual layout issues
gh issue list --search "in:title,body popeditor layout ID column width"

Length of output: 156


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find width-related patterns in the codebase
# Looking for width property in files containing 'popeditor'
rg -l "popeditor" | xargs rg "width:\s*(40|50)"

# Also search for any ID column configurations
rg "field.*id.*width" 

# Check if there are similar files in the same directory
fd . "examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor" -t f

Length of output: 14598

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/show-history-composition-api.vue (1)

15-15: LGTM! Consider verifying responsive behavior.

The width increase from 40 to 50 for the ID column is a reasonable adjustment that should improve readability. This change is consistent with updates across other similar components.

Let's verify if other numeric columns in the codebase might benefit from similar width adjustments:

✅ Verification successful

LGTM! Width change is consistently applied across all popeditor examples

The width increase from 40 to 50 for the ID column is part of a consistent pattern across all popeditor demo files. The search results confirm that:

  • All ID columns now use width: 50
  • Other columns (province, city) consistently use width: 80
  • This standardization improves the overall UI consistency
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for column definitions with numeric fields (id, number, etc.) to check their widths
ast-grep --pattern 'columns: [
  {
    field: $_,
    $_,
    width: $_
  }
]'

Length of output: 80


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find column width patterns in the codebase
# Search for width property definitions in Vue files
rg -U "width:\s*\d+" --type vue -A 2 -B 2

Length of output: 71


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for width patterns in all files since file type detection isn't working
rg -U "width:\s*\d+" -A 2 -B 2 examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

Length of output: 85510

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/basic-usage-composition-api.vue (1)

83-83: LGTM! Consistent width adjustment for better ID column visibility.

The increase in ID column width from 40 to 50 pixels provides better visibility for the ID field, which is particularly important for maintaining readability in grid layouts. This change aligns with similar adjustments made across other popeditor components in the codebase.

Let's verify the consistency of this width change across other popeditor components:

✅ Verification successful

Consistent width adjustment verified across popeditor components

Based on the search results, I can confirm that the ID column width of 50 pixels is consistently implemented across multiple popeditor components in the codebase, including:

  • basic-usage-composition-api.vue
  • events-composition-api.vue
  • before-close-composition-api.vue
  • condition-layout-composition-api.vue
  • conditions-composition-api.vue
  • grid-composition-api.vue
  • And several other popeditor components

The width change from 40 to 50 pixels has been properly synchronized across all relevant components, ensuring consistent column sizing throughout the application.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the ID column width consistency across popeditor components
# Expected: All ID column width values should be 50

# Search for ID column configurations in popeditor components
rg -U "field:\s*'id'[\s\S]*?width:\s*\d+" --type vue

Length of output: 88


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the width configurations in popeditor components
# First, let's find all popeditor-related files
fd "popeditor.*\.vue$" examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/ --type f --exec cat {} \; | grep -A 5 "field: 'id'"

Length of output: 124


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a simpler approach to first list the files and then examine their content
echo "Finding popeditor files:"
fd ".*\.vue$" examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

echo -e "\nExamining content:"
# Use a more lenient pattern to find id field configurations
fd ".*\.vue$" examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/ -x grep -l "field.*id" {} \; -x cat {} \;

Length of output: 151440

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/conditions-composition-api.vue (1)

84-84: LGTM! Verify if this fixes the ID column truncation.

The width increase from 40 to 50 for the ID column improves consistency across popeditor components and potentially fixes display issues. While the change looks good, since this is part of a bug fix PR, please verify that this resolves the original issue completely.

✅ Verification successful

Width change is consistent across all popeditor components

The width value of 50 has been consistently applied across all popeditor components, both in the composition API and options API versions. No instances of width: 40 were found, confirming that the change has been thoroughly implemented throughout the codebase.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if there are any remaining ID column width declarations that weren't updated
# This helps ensure consistency across all popeditor components

echo "Checking for any remaining ID column width: 40 declarations..."
rg -l '"id".*width.*40' 'examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor'

Length of output: 198


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more comprehensive search for ID column width declarations
# 1. Search for width declarations near 'id' with different patterns
rg -A 2 -B 2 '"id".*{' examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor

# 2. Also search for any width: 40 declarations to ensure we haven't missed any
rg 'width:\s*40' examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor

# 3. And search for current width: 50 declarations to confirm the changes
rg 'width:\s*50' examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor

Length of output: 5960

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/radio-change-close-composition-api.vue (1)

84-84: LGTM! Consistent width adjustment.

The width increase from 40 to 50 for the ID column aligns with similar changes across other popeditor components, suggesting a systematic fix for layout consistency.

Let's verify if this change addresses the intended bug and check for consistency across all popeditor components:

✅ Verification successful

Width property is consistently set to 50 across all popeditor components

The verification confirms that all popeditor components in the codebase have the same width value of 50 for the ID column, showing complete consistency across the implementation. This change is part of a systematic update that has been properly applied across all components.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the width property consistency across popeditor components
# and look for any related bug reports or discussions

# Check all popeditor components for width property consistency
echo "Checking width property in popeditor components..."
rg -U "field: 'id'[^}]+width:" examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

# Look for related bug discussions or issues
echo "Checking for related bug discussions..."
rg -i "id.*column.*width|popeditor.*layout" .github/

Length of output: 17432

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/trigger-composition-api.vue (1)

89-89: LGTM! Consistent width adjustment across components.

The width increase from 40 to 50 for the ID column provides better visual spacing, reducing potential text truncation issues. This change aligns with similar adjustments made across other popeditor components.

Let's verify the consistency of this width change across all related files:

✅ Verification successful

Width change is consistently applied across all popeditor components

The verification confirms that the width value of 50 for the ID column is consistently set across all popeditor components in both Options API and Composition API implementations. All 54 instances of the ID column configuration show the same width value, indicating a uniform update across the entire component suite.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the ID column width is consistently set to 50 across all popeditor components
# Expected: All matches should show width: 50 for the id field

rg -A 5 "field: 'id'," examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

Length of output: 33076

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/auto-reset-composition-api.vue (1)

85-85: LGTM! Consistent width adjustment for better ID display.

The increase in ID column width from 40 to 50 pixels improves the readability of the grid, especially for double-digit IDs.

Let's verify the consistency of this width change across other popeditor demos:

Consider adding a comment explaining the minimum width requirement for the ID column to help maintain consistency in future updates:

     {
       field: 'id',
       title: 'ID',
+      // Minimum width of 50px to accommodate double-digit IDs
       width: 50
     },
✅ Verification successful

Width change is consistently applied across all popeditor demos

The verification shows that all popeditor demo files in the codebase have the ID column width set to 50px, confirming that this change is part of a consistent UI improvement across the entire component suite.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent ID column width across popeditor demos
# Expected: All ID column widths should be 50

# Search for ID column width definitions in popeditor demo files
rg -U "field:\s*'id'[^}]+width:\s*\d+" examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

Length of output: 17185

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/before-close-composition-api.vue (1)

84-84: LGTM! Column width adjustment is consistent with application-wide changes.

The increase in the ID column width from 40 to 50 pixels aligns with similar changes across other popeditor components, maintaining UI consistency.

Let's verify the consistency of this change across other popeditor components:

✅ Verification successful

Based on the search results, I can see that the width value of 50 for the ID column is consistently used across all popeditor components in both the composition API and options API versions. The search results show numerous files where the ID column width is set to 50, confirming that this is indeed a standardized value across the component library.

LGTM! Column width change is consistent with application-wide standards

The width value of 50 for the ID column is consistently implemented across all popeditor components in the codebase, maintaining UI uniformity.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent ID column width across popeditor components
# Expected: All ID columns should have width: 50

# Search for ID column definitions in popeditor components
rg --type vue 'field:\s*["\']id["\'].*width' examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

Length of output: 93


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to search for id column width definitions
rg --type vue "field: 'id'.*width:|field: \"id\".*width:" examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

Length of output: 130


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for id column width definitions without file type restriction
rg "field: 'id'.*width:|field: \"id\".*width:" examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

Length of output: 91


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check what files exist in the popeditor directory
ls -la examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

# Then search for any width-related configurations in these files
rg "width:\s*\d+" examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

Length of output: 25734

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/clearable-composition-api.vue (1)

84-84: Please clarify the bug being fixed.

The width increase from 40 to 50 appears to be a UI enhancement. Could you provide more context about the specific bug or issue this change addresses? This would help validate if the fix properly addresses the root cause.

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/resize-composition-api.vue (1)

77-77: Verify if this resolves the original issue.

Since this change is part of a bug fix PR, please verify:

  1. That the ID column content is now fully visible without truncation
  2. That sorting icons (if any) don't cause content overflow
  3. That the change doesn't adversely affect responsive layouts
✅ Verification successful

Let me generate additional scripts to verify the impact of this width change:


Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response:

The width change to 50 appears to be consistent with the codebase

The search results show that:

  1. The width value of 50 is consistently used across many popeditor examples for ID columns
  2. This appears to be a standardized width value used throughout the popeditor component demos
  3. The change from 40 to 50 aligns with the common pattern seen in other similar implementations
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any related width-specific issues or discussions
rg -g '!{dist,node_modules}' -i "id.*column.*width|column.*width.*40"

# Look for any other grid configurations that might need similar adjustments
ast-grep --pattern 'width: 40'

Length of output: 117827


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the specific file and surrounding context
rg -B 5 -A 5 "width: 50" examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/resize-composition-api.vue

# Look for any related width configurations in popeditor components
rg -g '!{dist,node_modules}' "width: [34567]0" examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

# Check for any related issues or PRs discussing column width
rg -g '!{dist,node_modules}' -i "popeditor.*width|column.*width.*40.*popeditor"

Length of output: 6800

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/icon-composition-api.vue (2)

23-23: LGTM! The width adjustment improves readability.

The increase in ID column width from 40 to 50 pixels provides better spacing for the numeric IDs, preventing potential truncation issues.


23-23: Verify PR type and documentation requirements.

This change appears to be a UI enhancement rather than a bug fix. Additionally, since this change is applied consistently across multiple demo files, it might need to be documented in the changelog or component documentation.

Let's verify the extent of these changes and documentation:

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/auto-lookup-composition-api.vue (1)

27-27: Verify if this width adjustment resolves any visual issues.

The change from 40 to 50 pixels for the ID column width appears to be part of a broader standardization effort across multiple popeditor components.

Let's verify the consistency of this change across other components:

✅ Verification successful

Based on the git history and codebase analysis, I can now provide a final response:

Width change from 40 to 50 is part of a consistent standardization effort

The change from 40 to 50 pixels for the ID column width is part of a systematic update across the codebase, as evidenced by multiple similar changes in the git history. This standardization improves visual consistency across components and appears to be an intentional design decision.

  • The git history shows multiple instances of ID column width being updated from 40 to 50 pixels
  • The change is consistent with other popeditor components in the codebase
  • This standardization helps maintain a uniform appearance for ID columns across the application
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the width of 'id' columns in other popeditor components
# Expected: All id columns should have width: 50

# Search for id column definitions in popeditor components
rg -U --multiline 'field:\s*["\']id["\'].*?\{.*?width:.*?\}' -g '*.vue'

Length of output: 93


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to search for id column definitions
# Search for field: 'id' or field: "id" followed by width property
rg -U "field:\s*['\"]id['\"].*?width:\s*\d+" --multiline -g '*.vue'

Length of output: 763


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's specifically search for id columns in popeditor components
# to see the current width settings in related components
rg -U "field:\s*['\"]id['\"].*?width:\s*\d+" --multiline -g '**/popeditor/*.vue'

# Also search for any recent changes to these widths in git history
git log -p | rg "width:\s*[45]0" -B2 -A2

Length of output: 70641

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/before-reset-composition-api.vue (1)

85-85: Verify if 50px width is sufficient for all possible ID values.

The width increase from 40px to 50px improves readability, but please ensure this width accommodates the maximum possible ID length in production data.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the search results, I can see that IDs are used extensively throughout the codebase in various contexts, including:

  1. Menu items and tree nodes with IDs typically 1-4 characters long
  2. Grid/table data with IDs typically 3-4 characters long
  3. Generated IDs for components that can be longer
  4. Business data IDs that follow various formats

Looking at the specific context of the popeditor component where the width change is being made, the IDs shown in the examples are numeric and 1-2 digits long (e.g. 1, 2, 3...). The width increase from 40px to 50px appears sufficient for these types of IDs.

Let me verify the specific popeditor examples to be completely certain.


Based on the search results, I can now see that in the popeditor examples, the IDs are consistently single-digit numbers (1-5) or generated using the formula pageSize * (currentPage - 1) + i + 1, which typically results in 1-2 digit numbers. The width increase from 40px to 50px is more than sufficient to accommodate these ID lengths.

The width increase to 50px is appropriate for the ID column.

The change is verified to be suitable because:

  1. All example data shows IDs of 1-2 digits
  2. The ID generation logic in the popeditor components indicates IDs will be paginated numbers
  3. 50px provides comfortable spacing for 2-digit numbers while maintaining a compact layout
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for ID patterns across the codebase to verify typical ID lengths
rg -g '*.{vue,js,ts}' -A 2 'id: .{10,}' # Search for IDs longer than 10 characters

Length of output: 319765


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for ID patterns specifically in popeditor examples
rg -g '*popeditor*.{vue,js,ts}' 'id:.*' examples/

Length of output: 2465

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/show-overflow-composition-api.vue (1)

88-88: LGTM! Consistent width adjustment for better readability.

The increase in ID column width from 40px to 50px appears to be a reasonable fix to improve the visual layout, especially considering some IDs might be longer than two digits.

Let's verify this change is consistent across all popeditor demos:

✅ Verification successful

Width change is consistently applied across all popeditor demos

The verification confirms that the ID column width is set to 50 pixels across all popeditor demo files, both in regular and composition API versions. This consistent implementation ensures a uniform appearance throughout the component examples.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the ID column width is consistently set to 50 across all popeditor demos
# Expected: All ID column width values should be 50

rg -U --type vue 'field: .id.,\s*title: .ID.,\s*width:' examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

Length of output: 124


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a simpler pattern to find width configurations in popeditor demos
rg -l "width: [0-9]+" examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

# Then examine the content of these files focusing on ID column configuration
rg -A 5 "field: ['\"](id|ID)['\"]" examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

Length of output: 37379

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/multi-value-array-composition-api.vue (1)

90-90: LGTM! However, this appears to be a UI enhancement rather than a bug fix.

The width increase from 40 to 50 pixels for the ID column is a reasonable change that should improve readability. However, this seems to be more of a UI enhancement rather than a bug fix as indicated in the PR title "fix bugs 1025".

Let's verify if this width change is consistently applied across all popeditor instances:

✅ Verification successful

Width change is consistently applied across all popeditor instances

The verification shows that all popeditor demo files in the codebase have the ID column width set to 50 pixels, confirming that the change has been consistently applied across all instances. While this appears to be a UI enhancement rather than a bug fix, the implementation is uniform throughout the codebase.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistency of ID column width across all popeditor demos
# Expected: All ID column widths should be 50

# Search for ID column width definitions in popeditor demo files
rg -U "field:\s*'id'[^}]+width:\s*\d+" examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

Length of output: 17185

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/multi-composition-api.vue (1)

96-96: LGTM! Verify layout impact across different screen sizes.

The width increase from 40 to 50 for the ID column provides better space utilization. This change is consistent with similar updates across other files in the PR.

Let's verify the consistency of this width change across all popeditor examples:

✅ Verification successful

Width change is consistent across all popeditor examples

The verification confirms that all ID columns in popeditor examples have been consistently set to width: 50, including both composition API and options API versions. This standardization ensures a uniform appearance across the component library.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any inconsistent ID column widths in popeditor examples
# Expected: All ID columns should have width: 50

rg -U "field: 'id'[^}]+width:" examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

Length of output: 17177

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/slot-footer-composition-api.vue (1)

82-82: LGTM! The width increase improves readability.

The change from 40px to 50px for the ID column provides better spacing for numeric IDs, and maintains consistency with other components in the codebase.

Let's verify this is part of the systematic update across all Popeditor components:

✅ Verification successful

Verified: ID column width consistently updated to 50px across all Popeditor components

The search results confirm that the width change from 40px to 50px has been systematically applied across all Popeditor components in both Options API and Composition API versions. The change is consistent with the codebase-wide standardization effort, with no remaining instances of width: 40 found in the Popeditor components.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the ID column width is consistently set to 50 across all Popeditor components
# Expected: All matches should show width: 50 for the id column

rg -U --type vue 'field: .id.,\s+title: .ID.,\s+width:' examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

Length of output: 124


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more flexible search pattern to find id column configurations
rg -l "width.*50" examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

# Also search for any remaining instances of width: 40 to ensure consistency
rg -l "width.*40" examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

# Get the actual content around width configurations for detailed analysis
rg -B2 -A2 "width:.*[45]0" examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

Length of output: 33032

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/grid.vue (1)

83-83: LGTM! Column width standardization improves UI consistency.

The increase in ID column width from 40px to 50px enhances readability while maintaining a consistent layout across popeditor examples.

Let's verify this standardization across other popeditor examples:

✅ Verification successful

Verified: ID column width is consistently set to 50px across all popeditor examples

The search results confirm that all popeditor example files in the codebase have standardized their ID column width to 50px, showing successful implementation of the UI consistency improvement.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent ID column width across popeditor examples
# Expected: All ID column widths should be set to 50

# Search for ID column width definitions in popeditor examples
rg -U "field:\s*'id'[^}]+width:\s*\d+" examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

Length of output: 17185

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/textField.vue (1)

83-83: LGTM! Consider documenting the width change.

The width adjustment from 40 to 50 for the ID column aligns with similar changes across other components, providing better visual consistency.

Consider updating the component's documentation to reflect this width change, as it might affect the layout in existing implementations.

Let's verify if this change addresses a specific bug:

✅ Verification successful

Let me analyze the search results and generate additional verification scripts to better understand the width changes across the codebase.

This will help us:

  1. Find similar width changes from 40 to 50 across components
  2. Identify specific patterns for ID column widths
  3. Locate any documentation or configuration about column widths

Let me modify the search commands to handle the file type correctly.

This should help us:

  1. Find similar width changes from 40 to 50 in Vue files
  2. Identify specific patterns for ID column widths
  3. Locate any related configuration about column widths

Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response about the width change:

Width change is part of a standardization effort

The codebase shows a consistent pattern where ID column widths are being standardized:

  • Most existing implementations use width: 40 for ID columns
  • Several newer implementations use width: 50 for ID columns
  • This change appears to be part of a wider effort to standardize column widths across components

The change from 40 to 50 in this file aligns with this standardization pattern and improves visual consistency across the component library.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for related issues or discussions about ID column width issues
# Test: Look for mentions of ID column width problems in issues and PRs

# Search in issue titles and descriptions
gh issue list --search "id column width" --limit 10 --json number,title,body

# Search in PR descriptions
gh pr list --search "id column width" --limit 10 --json number,title,body

# Search for related comments in the codebase
rg -i "id.*column.*width|column.*width.*40" --type md

Length of output: 20976


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar width changes in grid columns across the codebase
rg -B2 -A2 'width:\s*[45]0' --type vue

# Search for ID column width patterns specifically
rg -B2 -A2 'field:\s*["\']id["\'].*width' --type vue

# Look for any related configuration or documentation about column widths
fd -e md -e vue -e js -X rg -l 'column.*width|grid.*column.*width'

Length of output: 162


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar width changes in grid columns
find . -type f -name "*.vue" -exec grep -B2 -A2 "width:\s*[45]0" {} \;

# Search for ID column width patterns
find . -type f -name "*.vue" -exec grep -B2 -A2 'field: "id".*width' {} \;
find . -type f -name "*.vue" -exec grep -B2 -A2 "field: 'id'.*width" {} \;

# Look for any related configuration about column widths in Vue files
find . -type f -name "*.vue" -exec grep -l "column.*width" {} \;

Length of output: 18001

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/draggable-composition-api.vue (1)

89-89: LGTM! Consistent width adjustment for better readability.

The increase in ID column width from 40px to 50px improves the visual presentation and readability of the grid.

Let's verify the consistency of this width change across other popeditor examples:

✅ Verification successful

Width change to 50px is consistently applied across all popeditor examples

The verification confirms that the ID column width is set to 50px across all 58 popeditor example files, showing a complete and consistent implementation of this UI improvement.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the ID column width is consistently set to 50 across all popeditor examples
# Expected: All matches should show width: 50 for the ID column

rg -U --multiline --glob '*.vue' \
  'field: .id.,\s+title: .ID.,\s+width: \d+' \
  examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

Length of output: 17216

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/pager-composition-api.vue (2)

23-23: LGTM: Column width adjustment is consistent.

The increase in ID column width from 40 to 50 aligns with similar changes across other components, providing better visibility for ID values.


Line range hint 52-89: Verify pagination edge cases and add error handling.

The pagination implementation should handle edge cases such as:

  • Invalid page numbers
  • Empty dataset
  • Page numbers exceeding total pages

Let's check if other components handle these cases:

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/disabled.vue (1)

89-89: LGTM! Width adjustment appears reasonable.

The increase in ID column width from 40 to 50 pixels makes sense given that some IDs in the dataset are double digits, ensuring better content visibility.

Let's verify if this width change is consistently applied across all popeditor examples:

✅ Verification successful

Width change is consistently applied across all popeditor examples

The verification confirms that all popeditor examples in the codebase have the ID column width set to 50 pixels, making this change consistent with the component's design pattern.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistency of ID column width across popeditor examples
# Expected: All ID column widths should be 50

rg -l "field: 'id'" examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/ | xargs rg "width: [0-9]+" -A 1 -B 2

Length of output: 70450

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/readonly.vue (2)

89-89: LGTM! Consistent width adjustment across popeditor components.

The increase in ID column width from 40 to 50 pixels appears to be part of a systematic fix being applied across all popeditor components, likely addressing potential text truncation issues.


89-89: Consider documenting minimum column width requirements.

To prevent similar issues in the future, it would be helpful to document the minimum recommended column widths for different data types in the component's documentation.

Let's check if there's existing documentation about column widths:

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/show-clear-btn.vue (2)

89-89: LGTM! Width change is consistent with other files.

The change from 40 to 50 pixels for the ID column width aligns with similar changes across other files in this PR, maintaining consistency in the UI.


89-89: Verify if 50px width is sufficient for all ID values.

While the example dataset shows short IDs (1-10), please verify that 50px width is adequate for all possible ID values in production use cases.

✅ Verification successful

Let me generate additional scripts to search for ID-related patterns in the codebase:

This will help us understand:

  1. How ID columns are typically configured in tables/grids
  2. How popeditor is used with ID fields in other components
  3. Whether there are any examples of longer numeric IDs in test data

Based on the search results, I can provide a final response:

50px width appears sufficient for ID values in this context

The codebase analysis shows:

  1. Most grid column index/selection columns consistently use 50-60px width across many examples
  2. No evidence of long numeric IDs in test data or production code
  3. The popeditor component is typically used with simple numeric IDs (shown by lack of matches for long IDs)
  4. Other grid implementations in the codebase also use similar widths for ID columns

The 50px width should be adequate since:

  • It can comfortably display IDs up to 5-6 digits
  • The component appears to be used primarily with simple sequential IDs
  • If longer IDs are needed, the grid columns are generally resizable by default
  • The width is consistent with established patterns across the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for ID field patterns in other components to understand typical ID lengths
rg -g '*.vue' -B 2 -A 2 '"id":\s*"[^"]{3,}"' || echo "No long IDs found in examples"

# Look for any ID-related props or documentation
rg -g '*.md' -i "id.*(?:width|length|format)" || echo "No ID format documentation found"

Length of output: 44766


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for ID column definitions in table/grid components
rg -g '*.{vue,js,ts}' -B 2 -A 2 'id.*(?:column|field|prop).*width' || echo "No ID column width definitions found"

# Look for popeditor component usage with ID fields
rg -g '*.{vue,js,ts}' -B 3 -A 3 'popeditor.*id' || echo "No popeditor ID usage found"

# Search for any numeric ID patterns in mock/test data
rg -g '*.{json,js,vue}' '"id":\s*\d{3,}' || echo "No long numeric IDs found in test data"

Length of output: 356269

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/title.vue (1)

90-90: LGTM! Please verify the visual improvement.

The increase in ID column width from 40 to 50 pixels should resolve any potential text truncation issues. Since this is a UI change being applied across multiple files, please ensure that:

  1. The ID values display correctly without truncation
  2. The wider column doesn't cause any layout issues in the grid
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/tabindex-composition-api.vue (2)

95-95: LGTM: Column width adjustment is reasonable.

The increase in the ID column width from 40 to 50 pixels provides better visibility for the ID field, which typically contains numeric values. This change maintains consistency with other files in the PR.


Line range hint 92-106: Verify text overflow handling for ID column.

The ID column has a fixed width, but there's no overflow handling specified unlike the 'name' column which uses showOverflow: 'tooltip'. While the current dataset shows only single-digit IDs, it's worth verifying if longer IDs could be used in the future.

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/selected-box-composition-api.vue (1)

92-92: Verify if this width change addresses a specific UI issue.

The change from 40 to 50 for the ID column width is consistent with similar changes across multiple files in this PR. However, since this is marked as a bug fix:

  1. Could you clarify if there was a specific issue (e.g., text truncation, layout breaking) that necessitated this width increase?
  2. Are there any design guidelines or requirements for minimum column widths in the TinyVue design system?

Let's check if there are any related issues or documentation about column widths:

✅ Verification successful

Width change is part of a consistent pattern across PopEditor components

The search results show that this width change from 40 to 50 for the ID column is part of a deliberate, consistent pattern across all PopEditor components in the codebase:

  1. All PopEditor demo files have standardized the ID column width to 50
  2. The change appears to be a design standardization rather than a bug fix, as it's consistently applied across all PopEditor implementations
  3. The default width in the core component (packages/vue/src/popeditor/src/index.ts) is still 40, suggesting these demo files are showcasing the recommended width for better usability

The width change is verified as an intentional improvement to the component's visual presentation rather than a bug fix.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for related issues or documentation about column widths
echo "Searching for related issues or documentation..."

# Check if there are any related issues mentioning column width problems
gh issue list --search "column width id popeditor" --state all

# Look for any design guidelines in docs
rg -i "column width|grid width|minimum width" docs/

# Check if other components have similar width specifications
rg -A 1 "field: 'id'.*width:" --type vue

Length of output: 942


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find width-related patterns in Vue files

# Search for width patterns in files containing 'popeditor'
rg -l "popeditor" | xargs rg -A 2 "width: [34567]0"

# Find all Vue files and search for id column configurations
fd ".vue$" | xargs rg -A 2 "field: 'id'"

# Look for any documentation files about PopEditor
fd -e md | xargs rg -i "popeditor|column width"

# Check for any configuration files that might contain default widths
fd "config|settings" | xargs rg -i "column.*width|default.*width"

Length of output: 26430

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/width.vue (1)

91-91: LGTM! Consistent width adjustment across demo files.

The increase in ID column width from 40 to 50 pixels improves readability while maintaining consistency with similar changes across other demo files.

Let's verify the consistency of this width change across all related demo files:

✅ Verification successful

Width change is consistently applied across all popeditor demo files

The verification confirms that all 54 popeditor demo files in the codebase have the ID column width set to 50, showing complete consistency in the implementation. This includes both regular and composition API variants of the demos.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent ID column width across all popeditor demo files
# Expected: All files should show width: 50 for the id column

# Search for ID column width configurations in all Vue files under popeditor demos
rg -U "field: 'id'[^}]+width: \d+" examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

Length of output: 17181

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/condition-layout-composition-api.vue (3)

25-25: LGTM: Grid column width adjustment is consistent.

The increased width for the ID column aligns with similar changes across other components, improving the visual presentation of the grid.


51-53: LGTM: Improved form layout consistency.

The changes establish consistent label widths (50px) and grid spans (6) for both conditions, resulting in a better-aligned and more maintainable form layout.

Also applies to: 62-68


62-68: Verify the removal of '公司名' condition.

The company name condition has been removed from the conditions array. Please confirm if this removal was intentional and doesn't affect the search functionality.

Let's check if the company name field is still used in the remote search results:

✅ Verification successful

The removal of '公司名' condition is intentional and does not affect functionality

After reviewing both the original and composition API versions of the code, I can confirm that:

  1. The '公司名' condition was never part of the search conditions array in either version - the conditions only include 'city' and 'employees'
  2. The company name is only used in the remoteSearch function to generate random company names for the grid data (randomAlphabets() + 'YX公司')
  3. The functionality remains identical between both versions, just refactored to use the Composition API
  4. The spec file verifies only the layout functionality, not the search conditions

The removal mentioned in the review comment appears to be incorrect as there was no company name condition to remove. The search functionality is working as intended with the two existing conditions (city and employees).

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if company name is still used in search results
# The component still generates company names in the search results (name: randomAlphabets() + 'YX公司')
# but the search condition for it has been removed

# Search for any other instances where company name condition might be defined
rg -l "公司名|company|name" --type vue

Length of output: 65


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try searching without file type restriction since the vue extension might not be recognized
rg -l "公司名|company|name"

# Also search for any references to the specific component or related files
rg -l "condition-layout-composition-api"

Length of output: 221001


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the file and related files to understand the context
cat examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/condition-layout-composition-api.vue

# Also check for any related condition files in the same directory
ls -la examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/condition*

Length of output: 3576


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the original condition-layout.vue file to compare the changes
cat examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/condition-layout.vue

# Also check the spec file to understand the test requirements
cat examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/condition-layout.spec.ts

Length of output: 3122

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/auto-lookup.vue (1)

32-32: LGTM! The width increase improves readability.

The change from 40 to 50 for the ID column width provides better spacing for displaying numeric IDs, enhancing the UI's readability.

Let's verify the consistency of this width change across other example files:

✅ Verification successful

Width change is consistently applied across all popeditor examples

The verification confirms that the width change to 50 for the ID column is consistently implemented across all popeditor example files in the codebase, including both regular and composition API versions. This ensures a uniform appearance and improved readability throughout the documentation.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the ID column width is consistently set to 50 across all popeditor example files
# Expected: All matches should show width: 50 for the id field

rg -U --multiline --glob '*.vue' -A 5 $'field: .id.,\n.*title: .ID.' examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

Length of output: 38830

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/basic-usage.vue (1)

88-88: LGTM! Consistent width adjustment for better ID column visibility.

The increased width from 40 to 50 pixels for the ID column should prevent potential text truncation issues.

Let's verify the consistency of this width change across other demo files:

✅ Verification successful

LGTM! Width change is consistently applied across all popeditor demo files.

The verification confirms that the ID column width of 50 pixels is consistently set across all popeditor demo files, both in regular and composition API versions. This standardization ensures uniform presentation of the ID column throughout the component examples.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all popeditor demo files have the same ID column width

# Test: Search for ID column width definitions in popeditor demo files
# Expect: All should show width: 50
rg -U --type vue 'field: .id.*\n.*width:' examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

Length of output: 110


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the width patterns in popeditor files
# without relying on file type detection

# Search for ID column width definitions in all files under popeditor directory
rg -l "field.*id.*width" examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

# Then get the context around these matches to verify the width values
rg -B1 -A1 "width: \d+" examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

Length of output: 51891

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/radio-change-close.vue (1)

89-89: LGTM! Column width adjustment looks appropriate.

The increase in ID column width from 40 to 50 pixels provides better visibility while maintaining a compact layout.

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/trigger.vue (1)

94-94: LGTM! Consistent width adjustment.

The increase in ID column width from 40 to 50 aligns with similar changes across other popeditor components, improving the visual presentation of the grid.

Let's verify the consistency of this width change across all popeditor demo files:

✅ Verification successful

Width change is consistently applied across all popeditor demos

The verification confirms that all 'id' column width values in the popeditor demo files have been uniformly set to 50, showing complete consistency across the codebase.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all popeditor demo files use the same ID column width

# Search for ID column width definitions in popeditor demo files
rg -U "field: 'id'[^}]+width: \d+" examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

Length of output: 17181

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/conditions.vue (1)

89-89: LGTM! Consider verifying the visual improvement.

The width increase from 40 to 50 for the ID column appears to be a reasonable adjustment. This change is being consistently applied across multiple popeditor examples, suggesting a systematic fix for column width issues.

To ensure this change adequately addresses the visual concerns, please verify:

  1. The ID column now properly displays all IDs without truncation
  2. The width increase doesn't cause any layout issues in the grid
  3. The change maintains visual consistency across different screen sizes and data sets
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/auto-reset.vue (1)

90-90: Width adjustment appears to fix potential layout issues.

The increase from 40px to 50px for the ID column provides better spacing for numeric values, preventing potential text truncation.

Let's verify if this width change is consistently applied across other examples:

✅ Verification successful

Width change is consistently applied across all popeditor examples

The verification shows that all popeditor example files in the codebase have the ID column width set to 50px, confirming this is a standardized value across the component's demo implementations.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistency of ID column width across popeditor examples
# Expected: All ID column widths should be set to 50

# Search for ID column width definitions in popeditor examples
rg -U "field:\s*'id'[^}]+width:\s*\d+" examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

Length of output: 17185

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/before-close.vue (1)

89-89: LGTM! Width adjustment improves grid layout consistency.

The increase in the ID column width from 40 to 50 pixels is appropriate for the data being displayed and aligns with similar changes across other popeditor components, ensuring consistent grid layouts throughout the application.

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/resize.vue (1)

82-82: LGTM! Consider verifying maximum ID lengths.

The increase in ID column width from 40px to 50px appears to be a reasonable fix for better readability. The change is consistent with similar updates across other files in the codebase.

Let's verify the maximum length of IDs in the codebase to ensure 50px is sufficient:

✅ Verification successful

Let me try a different approach to find the data patterns in the popeditor examples.


Based on the search results, I can now provide a definitive response about the ID column width change:

The 50px width for ID column is appropriate

The codebase search reveals that:

  1. All IDs in the example data are single or double digits (e.g., '1', '2', '100')
  2. The 50px width has been consistently implemented across multiple files (show-history.vue, render-text.vue, pager.vue, etc.)
  3. The longest ID found is '100' in the tree.vue example

The width increase from 40px to 50px provides adequate space for displaying IDs while maintaining consistency across all popeditor examples.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for ID patterns in the dataset definitions across all Vue files
# Look for the longest ID value that might need to be displayed
rg -U "id: ['\"](.*?)['\"]" --type vue

Length of output: 72


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for ID patterns in data definitions across files
# Looking for numeric patterns that could represent IDs
rg -U "data\(\)" -A 10 examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

Length of output: 29005

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/render-text.vue (1)

30-30: LGTM! Width adjustment improves ID column readability.

The increase in width from 40 to 50 for the ID column aligns with similar changes across other components, suggesting a systematic improvement in the grid layout.

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/clearable.vue (1)

89-89: LGTM! Verify if this fixes any reported truncation issues.

The width increase from 40 to 50 for the ID column is consistent with similar changes across other components, suggesting a standardization effort. However, since this PR is marked as a bug fix, it would be helpful to understand if there were specific issues with ID values being truncated at width 40.

Let's check if there were any reported issues about ID truncation:

packages/theme/src/select/vars.less (1)

43-44: LGTM! Well-structured variable addition.

The new variable follows the established naming convention and is logically placed near related padding variables.

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/show-overflow.vue (1)

93-93: LGTM! Verify ID column width sufficiency.

The width increase from 40 to 50 is consistent with other files and improves the layout. However, please verify that 50px is sufficient for all possible ID values in your dataset.

✅ Verification successful

Width of 50px is sufficient for ID column

Looking at the mock data in the component, all IDs are simple numeric values ranging from '1' to '10'. The width of 50px provides adequate space for displaying these single and double-digit IDs, with room for future growth to accommodate triple-digit IDs if needed. The change is appropriate and consistent with the component's data requirements.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potentially long ID values in the codebase that might not fit in 50px
# Look for ID patterns in the demo data across all popeditor examples

rg -g '*.vue' -B 2 -A 2 '"id":' examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

Length of output: 72


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the data structure and ID values
# First, let's look for any data arrays or mock data in the file

rg -g '*.vue' -A 10 'data\(\).*{' examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/show-overflow.vue

# Also check for any imported data files
rg -g '*.vue' -B 2 'import.*data' examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/show-overflow.vue

# And search for any hardcoded arrays with id field
rg -g '*.vue' '\[.*"id":' examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/show-overflow.vue

Length of output: 353


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's fix the regex and try again to find the data structure
rg -g '*.vue' -A 10 'data\s*\(\)' examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/show-overflow.vue

# Also search for any table data or records
rg -g '*.vue' -A 5 'tableData|records' examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/show-overflow.vue

# Look for any mock data or sample data in the component
cat examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/show-overflow.vue

Length of output: 2667

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/multi-value-array.vue (1)

95-95: LGTM! Verify consistency across other files.

The width increase from 40 to 50 pixels for the ID column is a reasonable adjustment to ensure proper display of the column content and header.

Let's verify this change is consistently applied across other popeditor components:

✅ Verification successful

Width change is consistently applied across all popeditor components

The search results confirm that all popeditor components in the codebase have the ID column width set to 50 pixels, showing complete consistency across the entire component family. This validates that the width change is part of a systematic update.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistency of ID column width in popeditor components
# Expected: All ID column widths should be set to 50

# Search for column definitions with field 'id' in popeditor components
rg -U "field:\s*'id'[\s\S]{1,50}width:" "examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/"

Length of output: 17186

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/before-reset.vue (1)

90-90: LGTM! Consistent width adjustment for better readability.

The change from 40 to 50 pixels for the ID column width aligns with similar changes across other components, indicating a standardization effort to improve grid layout consistency.

Let's verify this standardization across other popeditor components:

✅ Verification successful

Width standardization verified across all popeditor components

The search results confirm that all popeditor components in the codebase consistently use width: 50 for the ID column, including both Vue 2 and Composition API versions. This change is part of a successful standardization effort.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent ID column width across popeditor components
# Expected: All popeditor components should use width: 50 for the ID column

# Search for ID column width definitions in popeditor components
rg -U "field:\s*'id'[^}]+width:\s*\d+" examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

Length of output: 17185

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/multi.vue (1)

96-96: LGTM! The width increase improves the ID column's visibility.

The change from 40 to 50 pixels for the ID column is a reasonable adjustment that ensures better visibility of ID values, particularly for multi-digit IDs in the dataset.

Let's verify that this width change is consistently applied across other popeditor examples:

✅ Verification successful

Width change to 50px is consistently applied across popeditor examples

The verification confirms that the ID column width of 50px is consistently implemented across the basic usage and composition API examples, making this a standardized improvement in the UI.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the ID column width is consistently set to 50 across popeditor examples
# Expected: All ID column width values should be 50

# Search for ID column definitions in popeditor example files
rg -U --type vue 'field: .id.*width:.*\d+' examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

Length of output: 111


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to search for width definitions in popeditor examples
# First, let's find all the files in the popeditor directory
fd . examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/ --type f --exec cat {} \; | grep -A 2 -B 2 'field: .id.*width'

Length of output: 111


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a simpler approach to first see the content of the files
fd . examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/ --type f

Length of output: 6806


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the content of similar example files to check for width consistency
cat examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/basic-usage.vue examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/basic-usage-composition-api.vue examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/multi-composition-api.vue | grep -B 2 -A 2 'field: .id'

Length of output: 478

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/show-history.vue (1)

22-22: LGTM! Consider verifying ID column width for all use cases.

The width increase from 40 to 50 pixels is consistent with changes across other files and should improve the visual presentation of the ID column.

Let's verify if the new width is sufficient for all possible ID lengths in the codebase:

✅ Verification successful

Width increase to 50px is appropriate for all ID values

Based on the comprehensive search results, the ID values across all popeditor examples are:

  • Single/double digit numbers (1-10) in most examples
  • Three-digit numbers (100, 411, 421) in tree examples
  • Two-digit numbers (20, 25) in company data examples

The width increase from 40px to 50px provides sufficient space for displaying all these ID values, including the longest three-digit IDs.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for ID patterns in the demo data across all popeditor examples
# to ensure the 50px width is sufficient for the longest ID

# Look for ID field values in the demo data
rg -U --multiline '{\s+id:\s+.+?,\s+name:' examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

Length of output: 181


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a simpler pattern to find ID values in the demo data
rg "id: ['\"]?\d+['\"]?" examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

# Also search for any array/object declarations that might contain ID values
rg -U "const\s+data\s*=\s*\[" -A 5 examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

# Look for any mock data or sample data declarations
rg "mockData|sampleData|testData" -A 5 examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

Length of output: 52271

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/icon.vue (1)

28-28: LGTM! Consistent width adjustment across popeditor demos.

The increase in ID column width from 40 to 50 pixels improves the visual presentation and maintains consistency with other popeditor demo files.

Let's verify the consistency of this width change across other popeditor demos:

✅ Verification successful

Width change is consistently applied across all popeditor demos

The verification confirms that all popeditor demo files, both regular and composition API versions, have the width value set to 50. This includes the file under review (icon.vue) and its composition API counterpart (icon-composition-api.vue), showing a systematic and consistent implementation across the entire demo suite.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the width change consistency across popeditor demos
# Expected: All id columns in popeditor demos should have width: 50

# Search for id column definitions in popeditor demo files
rg -U --multiline 'field:\s*["\']id["\'].*?\{.*?width:.*?\d+' examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

Length of output: 93


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to search for width definitions in popeditor demos
# Search for files first, then look for width patterns

# Find all vue files in popeditor directory
fd "\.vue$" examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/ --exec rg -U "field:\s*['\"]id['\"].*?width:\s*\d+" {}

Length of output: 113


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a simpler pattern to search for width values in popeditor demos
# First, let's see what files exist in the directory
fd "\.vue$" examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

# Then search for width patterns in these files
rg "width:\s*[45]0" examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

Length of output: 10299

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/size-composition-api.vue (1)

114-114: The width adjustment looks reasonable, but please clarify the bug classification.

While increasing the ID column width from 40 to 50 pixels may improve readability, this appears to be a UI enhancement rather than a bug fix. Could you please clarify:

  1. What was the original bug being addressed?
  2. How does this width change resolve the reported issue?

Let's verify if this is a consistent change across all popeditor examples:

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/slot-footer.vue (1)

88-88: LGTM! Width adjustment improves readability.

The increase in the ID column width from 40 to 50 pixels provides better spacing for the content. This change is consistent with similar adjustments across other popeditor components.

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/suggest-composition-api.vue (1)

95-95: Approve width adjustment with verification needed.

The ID column width increase from 40px to 50px aligns with similar changes across other components. While this change improves consistency, please verify:

  1. The specific bug or issue this fixes
  2. Whether this resolves any text truncation problems
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/draggable.vue (1)

94-94: LGTM! Width adjustment improves readability.

The increase in ID column width from 40 to 50 pixels is a reasonable change that should improve the visibility of ID values. This change is consistently applied across multiple files in the codebase.

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/events-composition-api.vue (1)

26-26: LGTM! Consider verifying ID column width requirements.

The increased width improves readability of the ID column. However, since this is a demo file that serves as a reference for implementation, it would be good to verify that 50px is sufficient for all possible ID lengths in real-world usage.

Let's check other demo files for maximum ID lengths:

✅ Verification successful

Let me analyze the ID values found in the demo files:

  1. Most IDs are generated using the formula: pageSize * (currentPage - 1) + i + 1

    • These are sequential numbers starting from 1
    • Even with large page sizes and current pages, these would typically be 3-4 digits
  2. Fixed ID examples found:

    • Two-digit IDs: 20, 25
    • Three-digit IDs: 411, 421
    • Two-digit tree node IDs: 51, 52, 53, 61, 62, 63

Let's verify the column configurations in other files to ensure consistency:


Let me try a different search pattern to find column width configurations:


Based on the comprehensive search results, I can now make a definitive assessment:

Width change to 50px for ID column is consistent and appropriate

The search results show that:

  1. All PopEditor demo files consistently use 50px width for ID columns
  2. The largest ID values found are 3 digits (e.g., 411, 421)
  3. The width is balanced relative to other columns (province/city at 80px)
  4. This standardization improves UI consistency across all examples

The change from 40px to 50px is part of a systematic update that maintains consistency across the component library's demo files, providing adequate space for typical ID values while keeping a balanced column layout.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for ID values in the dataset to verify if 50px width is sufficient
# Look for id field declarations in the demo files
rg -A 1 'id: .{10,}' examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

Length of output: 4830


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for ID column width configurations in all PopEditor demo files
rg -B 2 -A 2 'width: \d+.*id' examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

Length of output: 70


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for column configurations in PopEditor demo files
rg -B 2 -A 2 'width: \d+' examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

Length of output: 85505

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/tabindex.vue (1)

100-100: LGTM! Consistent width adjustment across components.

The width increase from 40 to 50 for the ID column aligns with similar changes across other files, suggesting a systematic improvement to the grid layout.

Let's verify the consistency of this width change across other files:

✅ Verification successful

Width change is consistently applied across all popeditor demos

The search results confirm that the width value of 50 for the ID column is consistently set across all popeditor demo files, both in regular Vue and Composition API versions. This change appears to be part of a systematic update to standardize the ID column width across the component's demo implementations.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the pattern of ID column width changes across popeditor demos
# Expected: Find other instances where the width was changed from 40 to 50

rg -B2 -A2 'field: .id.\s*,\s*title:.*width:' examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

Length of output: 86


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search pattern to find width configurations in popeditor demos
rg -B2 -A2 'width:\s*(40|50)' examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

# Also search for the id field configuration with a more lenient pattern
rg -B2 -A2 'field:\s*["\']id["\']' examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

Length of output: 27937

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/pager.vue (1)

28-28: LGTM! Consistent width adjustment across popeditor examples.

The increase in ID column width from 40 to 50 pixels provides better visibility for the ID values and maintains consistency with similar changes across other popeditor example files.

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/selected-box.vue (2)

97-97: LGTM! Width adjustment aligns with PR changes.

The increase in ID column width from 40 to 50 pixels appears to be part of a systematic improvement across multiple components.


97-97: Verify consistent width updates across components.

Let's confirm this is part of a consistent pattern of ID column width updates.

✅ Verification successful

Width configuration is consistent across all popeditor components

The search results confirm that the ID column width of 50 is consistently used across all popeditor demo components, with complementary widths of 80 for other columns like province and city. This shows a deliberate and uniform pattern in the grid column configurations.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the pattern of ID column width changes across popeditor components
# Expected: Find instances where width was changed from 40 to 50 in grid configurations

# Search for grid column configurations with ID field
rg -U --multiline 'columns:\s*\[.*?\{\s*field:\s*[\'"]id[\'"].*?width:.*?\}' \
   --type vue \
   --glob 'examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/*.vue'

Length of output: 93


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to search for column configurations
rg -U "width:\s*[0-9]+" --type vue --glob 'examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/*.vue' -B 2 -A 2

Length of output: 127


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for width configurations in all files without file type restriction
rg -U "width:\s*[0-9]+" examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/ -B 2 -A 2

Length of output: 85513

packages/theme/src/option/index.less (1)

83-83: Verify browser compatibility for the :has() selector.

While the selector modification correctly excludes the "select all" option from getting the selected text color, the :has() selector has limited browser support. Ensure this works in all supported browsers.

Let's check the browser support requirements:

✅ Verification successful

The :has() selector usage is compatible with the project's browser requirements

The project's browserslist configuration targets modern browsers (">1%" and "last 2 versions"), which aligns well with the current browser support for the :has() selector. All major modern browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge) now support this selector, and the project explicitly excludes IE support. The selector modification is safe to use.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if there are any browser compatibility requirements defined
# Look for browser support documentation or package.json browserslist

rg -g '*.{md,json}' -i 'browser.*support|browserslist'

Length of output: 369


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual browserslist configuration and any browser support documentation
cat package.json | jq -r '.browserslist[]' 2>/dev/null
cat packages/theme-saas/package.json | jq -r '.browserslist[]' 2>/dev/null

# Also check for any CSS/browser compatibility related documentation
fd -e md | xargs rg -l -i "css|browser|compatibility"

Length of output: 1069

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/suggest.vue (1)

100-100: LGTM! Width adjustment addresses layout consistency.

The increase in ID column width from 40 to 50 pixels aligns with similar changes across other components, improving the grid layout consistency and potentially fixing text truncation issues.

Let's verify the consistency of this width change across other popeditor components:

✅ Verification successful

Width change is consistent across all popeditor components

The verification confirms that all ID columns in the popeditor components consistently use a width of 50 pixels. The change from 40 to 50 has been uniformly applied, maintaining layout consistency across the entire component set.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the ID column width consistency across popeditor components
# Expected: All ID column widths should be set to 50

# Search for ID column width definitions in popeditor components
rg -U "field:\s*'id'[^}]+width:\s*\d+" --type vue

Length of output: 85


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find width definitions in Vue files
# First, let's find all Vue files in the popeditor directory
fd ".*\.vue$" examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/ --exec rg -U "width:\s*\d+" {}

Length of output: 4237


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's get more context around the width definitions to confirm they're related to ID columns
fd ".*\.vue$" examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/ --exec rg -U "field:\s*['\"]id['\"][^}]+" -A 2 {}

Length of output: 7530

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/size.vue (1)

119-119: LGTM! Please verify the visual layout.

The width increase from 40 to 50 for the ID column appears to be part of a broader standardization effort across components. This change should provide better spacing for ID values.

Please verify that:

  1. IDs display correctly without truncation in all size variants (medium, small, mini)
  2. The increased width doesn't cause layout issues in smaller screen sizes
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/slot-composition-api.vue (1)

99-99: LGTM! Width adjustment aligns with standardization effort.

The increase in ID column width from 40 to 50 pixels is consistent with similar changes across other components, improving visual consistency and potentially preventing ID text truncation.

Let's verify this is part of a broader standardization effort:

✅ Verification successful

Width change is part of a consistent standardization

The verification confirms that all ID columns in the popeditor components have a standardized width of 50 pixels. This includes both Vue 2 and Composition API versions of the components, showing a uniform implementation across the entire popeditor component suite.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent ID column width across popeditor components
# Expect: All ID column widths should be 50

rg -U "field:\s*'id'[^}]+width:\s*\d+" examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/

Length of output: 17185

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/events.vue (1)

31-31: LGTM! Consistent width adjustment across components.

The change from 40 to 50 pixels for the ID column width aligns with similar changes across other components, maintaining consistency in the UI. This adjustment likely addresses potential text truncation issues.

Let's verify this is part of a consistent change across components:

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/slot.vue (1)

106-106: Verify if the ID column width adjustment resolves the UI issue.

The width change from 40 to 50 appears to be part of a larger effort to standardize column widths across multiple popeditor components. While this change is consistent, please ensure:

  1. This width adjustment actually fixes the reported UI issue
  2. The value 50 is now the standard width for ID columns across all popeditor instances

Consider documenting this standard width (50px for ID columns) in your component guidelines to maintain consistency in future implementations.

✅ Verification successful

ID column width standardization is confirmed across popeditor components

Based on the search results, the change from width 40 to 50 for ID columns is part of a consistent standardization effort. The results show:

  1. All popeditor demo components now use width: 50 for their columns
  2. Only a few remaining instances of width: 40 exist in different components (dialog-select, form) that are unrelated to the popeditor component

The width change is appropriate and maintains consistency across the popeditor component ecosystem. No further verification is needed as this appears to be an intentional standardization effort.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify the standardization of ID column width across all popeditor components
# Description: Search for any remaining instances where ID column width might not be 50

# Search for ID column width declarations in Vue files
rg -U "{\s*field:\s*['\"]id['\"].*width:.*}" --type vue

Length of output: 171


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find ID column width configurations
# Search for field:'id' or field:"id" patterns with nearby width declarations

# Using ripgrep with more flexible pattern
rg -U "field:\s*['\"]id['\"]" -A 5 -B 5 --type vue

# Also search for any width:40 patterns that might need updating
rg "width:\s*40" --type vue

Length of output: 142


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for ID column configurations without specifying file type
# Using general file search first to locate relevant files
fd "\.vue$" -x rg -l "field:\s*['\"]id['\"]" {} \;

# Then search for width patterns in those files
rg "width:\s*(40|50)" --type-add 'vue:*.vue' -t vue

Length of output: 19726

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor/condition-form-composition-api.vue (1)

132-132: LGTM! Consider verifying the visual impact.

The width increase from 40 to 50 for the ID column is consistent with similar changes across other files and should improve the readability of ID values.

Let's verify this is part of a consistent pattern across files:

✅ Verification successful

Width change is consistent across all popeditor demo files

The verification confirms that all ID column widths in the popeditor demo files are set to 50, showing a consistent implementation across the entire demo suite. This change is part of a systematic update and maintains UI consistency.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the width change consistency across popeditor files
# Expected: All ID column widths should be 50

# Search for ID column width definitions in popeditor demo files
rg -U "field: 'id'[^}]+width: \d+" "examples/sites/demos/pc/app/popeditor"

Length of output: 17180

packages/theme/src/popeditor/index.less (3)

138-138: Consistent use of CSS variables for padding.

Good use of CSS variables for consistent spacing. The change aligns with the component's styling pattern.

✅ Verification successful

Let's search for the variable definition and related spacing variables to verify the consistency of the padding system.


CSS variable is properly defined with expected default value

The variable --tv-Popeditor-search-item-padding-left is correctly defined in vars.less with the expected default value of var(--tv-space-sm, 4px), maintaining consistent spacing across the component.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the CSS variable is defined and its default value
rg --type less "tv-Popeditor-search-item-padding-left.*tv-space-sm" packages/theme/src/

Length of output: 2479


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the CSS variable definition in the theme files
rg --type less "tv-Popeditor-search-item-padding-left" packages/theme/src/

# Also check for any default spacing variables that might be related
rg --type less "tv-space-sm" packages/theme/src/popeditor/

Length of output: 565


134-134: Clarify bug fix relationship.

While the changes to use CSS variables are good for maintainability, it's unclear how these padding adjustments relate to the bug being fixed (#1025). Please update the PR description to explain the connection between these styling changes and the bug resolution.

Also applies to: 138-138


134-134: Verify CSS variable definition.

The change to use CSS variables improves maintainability. However, ensure that --tv-Popeditor-search-item-padding-right is properly defined in the component's variables file.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the first search results, I found that the CSS variable --tv-Popeditor-search-item-padding-right is properly defined in ./packages/theme/src/popeditor/vars.less. The variable is set to use the value of another CSS variable: var(--tv-space-sm, 4px).

CSS variable is properly defined and used correctly.

The variable is defined in the theme's variables file and correctly referenced in the component's styles, following the project's CSS variable naming conventions.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the CSS variable is defined in vars.less
rg --type less "tv-Popeditor-search-item-padding-right" packages/theme/src/

Length of output: 2479


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try searching with the correct path and also check for any similar variable definitions
rg --type less "tv-Popeditor-search-item-padding-right" .

Length of output: 281


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's also check for any variable definitions in vars.less files
fd vars.less --type f --exec cat {}

Length of output: 351342


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the popeditor component's less files for variable definitions
fd "popeditor.*\.less$" --type f --exec cat {}

Length of output: 50

packages/renderless/src/guide/index.ts (1)

65-67: LGTM! Good addition for proper lifecycle management.

The new beforeUnmount handler complements the existing lifecycle management code and helps prevent UI artifacts by ensuring the tour is hidden when the component is unmounted. This is a good fix for potential tour visibility issues.

packages/theme/src/select/index.less (2)

267-284: LGTM! Well-structured size variants.

The implementation of medium, small, and mini variants is clean and consistent, using appropriate CSS variables for heights and following the component's established patterns.


350-352: LGTM! Good accessibility improvement.

The addition of cursor: not-allowed to both tags and suffix in disabled state provides clear visual feedback to users, following accessibility best practices.

Also applies to: 361-361

packages/vue/src/select/src/pc.vue (1)

53-54: The updated :title binding correctly handles display for disabled single-select components

The nested ternary operator accurately sets the title attribute based on the component's state.

Comment on lines +33 to +34
mounted: mounted({ state, api: baseApi }),
beforeUnmount: beforeUnmount(state)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Memory leak risk: Tour instance needs proper cleanup

The current implementation in beforeUnmount only hides the tour using state.tour.hide() but doesn't destroy the instance. While the tour has destroy event handlers set up for cleanup of UI elements, the tour instance itself should be destroyed to prevent memory leaks.

  • beforeUnmount in index.ts should call state.tour.destroy() instead of just hide()
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify complete cleanup of Shepherd tour instance.

While hiding the tour is good, ensure that the Shepherd instance is properly destroyed to prevent memory leaks.

Let's check if the tour instance is properly cleaned up in the index file:


Let me verify if there's a potential memory leak by checking how the tour instance is managed in other parts of the code.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if proper cleanup is implemented in beforeUnmount
# Expected: Find implementation of beforeUnmount that includes tour.destroy()

rg -A 5 "export const beforeUnmount" "./packages/renderless/src/guide/"

Length of output: 463


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check tour instance creation and management
ast-grep --pattern 'state.tour = new Shepherd.Tour'

# Check if destroy is called anywhere in the codebase
rg "tour.*destroy" "./packages/renderless/src/guide/"

# Check the complete implementation of beforeUnmount
cat "./packages/renderless/src/guide/index.ts"

Length of output: 6824

Comment on lines +42 to +45
// 弹出表格搜索项右侧内间距
--tv-Popeditor-search-item-padding-right: var(--tv-space-sm, 4px);
// 弹出表格搜索项左侧内间距
--tv-Popeditor-search-item-padding-left: var(--tv-space-sm, 4px);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

The padding reduction from 16px to 4px appears to be inconsistent with existing paddings

The search results reveal that the current implementation uses larger padding values (16px, 8px) throughout the popeditor component. The proposed 4px reduction would be inconsistent with:

  • Left/right container paddings of 16px
  • Tab body padding of 16px
  • Search label padding of 8px

This significant reduction could disrupt the component's visual hierarchy and spacing consistency.

Locations that need attention:

  • packages/theme/src/popeditor/index.less: The new variables (4px) conflict with existing paddings in the search area
  • Consider keeping the padding consistent with other search-related elements (8px) or container paddings (16px)
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify the padding value reduction from 16px to 4px.

The new variables follow the proper naming convention and use design tokens correctly. However, the reduction in padding from the previous 16px (in index.less) to 4px (--tv-space-sm) is significant and might impact the layout.

Let's verify if this change is intentional and doesn't cause visual issues:


Let me generate additional verification scripts to check the previous padding values and their usage:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other components using similar padding values to ensure consistency
rg --type=less "space-sm" "packages/theme/src/"

# Check if there are any related UI test snapshots that might need updating
fd -e spec.ts -e spec.js "popeditor" "packages/"

Length of output: 4904


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the previous padding values in index.less
rg -A 2 -B 2 "padding" "packages/theme/src/popeditor/index.less"

# Look for any related changes in the component's implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ extends $_ {
  $$$
  search($$$) {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 1667

@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ const gridOp = ref({
{
field: 'id',
title: 'ID',
width: 40
width: 50
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Width value 40 still exists in several related components

The search results show that there are still several components using width: 40, particularly in similar contexts:

  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/grid/editor/popeditor-in-grid-remote-search.vue
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/grid/editor/popeditor-in-grid-remote-search-composition-api.vue
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dialog-select/nest-grid-single.vue
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dialog-select/nest-grid-single-composition-api.vue
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dialog-select/nest-grid-multi.vue
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dialog-select/nest-grid-multi-composition-api.vue

These files also use width: 40 for ID columns in similar grid/table contexts. For consistency, these should also be updated to width: 50.

🔗 Analysis chain

LGTM! Please verify the visual improvement.

The width increase from 40 to 50 for the ID column should provide better visibility. This change is consistent with similar updates across other popeditor components.

Let's verify this is the last remaining instance of the old width value:


The previous search might have been too restrictive. Let's broaden our search to catch all possible syntax variations of width: 40 in Vue files.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining instances of width: 40 in popeditor components
rg -g '*/popeditor/*.vue' '"width":\s*40' || echo "No remaining instances found"

Length of output: 259


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more comprehensive search pattern for width: 40
rg -g '*.vue' 'width:\s*40' || echo "No instances found"

# Also search with single quotes pattern
rg -g '*.vue' "width:\s*'40'" || echo "No instances found with single quotes"

# And search with explicit number pattern
rg -g '*.vue' ':width="40"' || echo "No instances found with explicit binding"

Length of output: 4847

@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ export default {
{
field: 'id',
title: 'ID',
width: 40
width: 50
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider using CSS variables for consistent column widths.

Since this width change is being applied across multiple files, consider defining it as a CSS variable for better maintainability. This would make future width adjustments easier and ensure consistency.

-            width: 50
+            width: var(--tiny-grid-id-column-width, 50)

You can define the variable in your global CSS:

:root {
  --tiny-grid-id-column-width: 50px;
}

@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ export default {
{
field: 'id',
title: 'ID',
width: 40
width: 50
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Width inconsistency found across ID columns - needs attention

The search results reveal inconsistent ID column widths across the codebase:

  • Several files in dialog-select still use width: 40 for ID columns:
    • dialog-select/nest-grid-single.vue
    • dialog-select/nest-grid-single-composition-api.vue
    • dialog-select/nest-grid-multi.vue
    • dialog-select/nest-grid-multi-composition-api.vue
  • Other files use different widths:
    • select/init-label.vue uses width: 60
    • The file under review uses width: 50

This suggests the width standardization is incomplete and needs to be aligned across all ID columns for consistency.

🔗 Analysis chain

LGTM! Verify visual alignment across different ID lengths.

The width increase from 40 to 50 for the ID column aligns with similar changes across other files, likely fixing truncation issues.

Let's verify the consistency of this change across other files:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining instances of ID columns with width: 40
# to ensure complete migration to width: 50

rg -l 'field:\s*["\']id["\'].*width:\s*40' --type vue

Length of output: 93


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's fix the syntax and try a more comprehensive search
# Search for ID column width configurations in Vue files
rg -i "field:\s*['\"]id['\"].*width:\s*\d+" --type vue -A 2

# Also search for width: 40 pattern to ensure no remnants
rg "width:\s*40" --type vue

Length of output: 151


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for ID column width configurations without file type restriction
rg -i "field:\s*['\"]id['\"].*width:\s*\d+" 

# Also search for any remaining width: 40 patterns
rg "width:\s*40" 

# List all files that might be related to this component
fd "condition-layout" 

Length of output: 6843

Comment on lines +65 to +67
export const beforeUnmount = (state) => () => {
state.tour.hide()
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:

Additional cleanup is needed to prevent memory leaks

The current implementation only hides the tour on unmount, but looking at the codebase:

  • The tour instance is created with event listeners and DOM modifications
  • Event handlers are attached to steps for 'show', 'hide', 'complete', 'cancel', and 'destroy' events
  • DOM classes are added for highlighting that should be cleaned up
  • The code uses Shepherd.js v11.1.1 which provides a destroy() method for proper cleanup

You should update the beforeUnmount handler to:

export const beforeUnmount = (state) => () => {
  if (state.tour) {
    state.tour.hide()
    state.tour.destroy()
  }
}
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify if additional cleanup is needed.

The current implementation hides the tour on unmount, which is good. However, we should verify if Shepherd.js requires additional cleanup (like destroying the tour instance) to prevent memory leaks.


Let me try a different search strategy to find more information about the tour cleanup.


Let me check the Shepherd.js documentation to understand the cleanup requirements.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other cleanup patterns in the codebase
echo "Searching for Shepherd cleanup patterns..."
rg -A 5 "tour\.(destroy|cleanup|dispose)" 

# Search for Shepherd.js usage documentation
echo "Searching for Shepherd.js documentation or config..."
fd -g "*shepherd*.{js,ts,md,json}"

Length of output: 290


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for Shepherd.js related imports and type definitions
echo "Searching for Shepherd.js imports..."
rg -A 3 "from ['\"]shepherd\.js['\"]"

# Search for tour initialization to understand the setup
echo "Searching for tour setup patterns..."
rg -A 5 "new Shepherd\.Tour"

# Look into the guide implementation file directly
echo "Checking guide implementation..."
cat packages/renderless/src/guide/index.ts

Length of output: 7802


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check package.json for Shepherd.js version
echo "Checking package.json for Shepherd.js version..."
fd -g "package.json" -x cat {} | grep -A 2 -B 2 "shepherd"

# Search for any destroy calls in the codebase
echo "Searching for tour destroy patterns..."
rg "tour\.destroy" -A 2 -B 2

# Check if there are any memory leak related issues or PRs
echo "Checking for memory leak related comments..."
rg -i "memory leak|cleanup|dispose" -g "*.{ts,js,vue}"

Length of output: 2173

@@ -502,7 +502,7 @@
<slot name="dropdown"></slot>
<li
v-if="multiple && showCheck && showAlloption && !state.multipleLimit && !state.query && !remote"
class="tiny-option tiny-select-dropdown__item"
class="tiny-option tiny-option_all tiny-select-dropdown__item"
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Avoid using magic numbers; replace -9 with a named constant

Using -9 as a special value for state.hoverIndex reduces code readability and maintainability. Consider defining a meaningful constant to represent this value.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants