Implement plotting overrides in plotting methods themselves, instead of "wrappers" #111
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR replaces #45 in order to clean up its history.
This addresses #43. It moves plotting-function enhancements from dedicated "wrapper" functions to the methods themselves, breaks apart some really unwieldy wrappers into their component parts, and (just like matplotlib) combines the keyword arg tables associated with each plotting wrapper using
matplotlib.docstring.dedent_interpd
.When using proplot locally, the proplot and matplotlibdocstrings will be concatenated with nice headers for each section using
_concatenate_docstrings
inaxes.py
. When sphinx is importing proplot for generating documentation, they will not be concatenated -- only the proplot docstring will be shown with an intersphinx link to the matplotlib one. This is done by addingdocstring.hardcopy: True
to the local.proplotrc
. Then_concatenate_docstrings
skips concatenation ifrcParams['docstring.hardcopy']
isTrue
.