chore: Add CONTRIBUTING.md - #14

I updated the list of reviewers to match the Governance Board. @rawkode and @usrbinkat, could you provide your feedback on this contributing.md document?

At the moment, I'm still not convinced on the convenctional commit aspect but that is mainly because I have never used it myself. @cobraz could you set up a repo where this is applied, have that bot you were referring to active on the repo and demo the whole setup to us? I can only agree on something if I better understand how it works and where it actually solves something or helps us.

At the moment, I'm still not convinced on the convenctional commit aspect but that is mainly because I have never used it myself. @cobraz could you set up a repo where this is applied, have that bot you were referring to active on the repo and demo the whole setup to us? I can only agree on something if I better understand how it works and where it actually solves something or helps us.

What exactly aren't you convinced about? Is this is mainly about lowering the bar on community contributions?

IMHO, when compared to having to manually add a CHANGELOG, this is less work for a contributor. It's also something they never need to worry about, since this whole thing can be implemented by making sure pull request titles adhere to conventional commits (and squashing). Which is easy for a maintainer to ensure, all without a contributor even thinking about it.

This isn't about a bot. It's about how we communicate commits, so that we can automate. I don't see how setting up a repository to demo anything helps. You can check many of the examples out in the wild. Give me a second to gather some