Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Issues: pypa/advisory-database

Beta
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

18 Open 54 Closed
18 Open 54 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Enquiry on when withdrawn is used.
#234 opened Apr 30, 2025 by petermcd
vulns/steam/PYSEC-2019-125.yaml is likely incorrect?
#233 opened Apr 29, 2025 by pombredanne
Can build tags be supported as part of version ranges for fix present or not?
#232 opened Apr 29, 2025 by xnox
Possible False positive PYSEC-2022-252
#231 opened Apr 23, 2025 by raqsilva8
Is 2025 data being used?
#228 opened Mar 17, 2025 by andrewpollock
2
Missing Published Dates in Advisories
#220 opened Dec 11, 2024 by gokul-sankars-22084
1
Description for aiocpa entry is wrong
#218 opened Dec 9, 2024 by malemburg
2
Possible false positive on pyQuEST: PYSEC-2022-43051
#216 opened Nov 29, 2024 by isobelhooper
missing vulneravility for dash-core-components <= 1.17.1
#180 opened Feb 20, 2024 by graingert
False positive on pyTigerGraph 1.5: PYSEC-2022-43064
#170 opened Nov 8, 2023 by dnovvak
Freshness of this advisory-database
#163 opened Oct 7, 2023 by fridex
2
Standardising on a format for describing affected functions.
#149 opened Aug 25, 2023 by oliverchang
51
Document version of OSV schema
#113 opened Mar 2, 2023 by kurtseifried
6
Contested advisory: GHSA-w596-4wvx-j9j6 / CVE-2022-42969
#104 opened Oct 20, 2022 by woodruffw
affected ranges in PYSEC-2019-169
#80 opened Jun 2, 2022 by afdesk
6
Make it easy to generate a new PYSEC advisory by hand
#74 opened May 24, 2022 by di
3
Some CVEs are missing
#65 opened Mar 23, 2022 by di
5
Should malware/spam/etc which gets removed from pypi generate advisories here?
#45 opened Dec 4, 2021 by westonsteimel
27
ProTip! Follow long discussions with comments:>50.