Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@aditya520
Copy link
Member

Summary

Rationale

How has this been tested?

  • Current tests cover my changes
  • Added new tests
  • Manually tested the code

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 12, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
component-library Ready Ready Preview Comment Nov 12, 2025 9:28pm
developer-hub Ready Ready Preview Comment Nov 12, 2025 9:28pm
5 Skipped Deployments
Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
api-reference Skipped Skipped Nov 12, 2025 9:28pm
entropy-explorer Skipped Skipped Nov 12, 2025 9:28pm
insights Skipped Skipped Nov 12, 2025 9:28pm
proposals Skipped Skipped Nov 12, 2025 9:28pm
staking Skipped Skipped Nov 12, 2025 9:28pm

{ id: "description", name: "Description" },
{ id: "name", name: "Name" },
{ id: "symbol", name: "Symbol" },
{ id: "pyth_lazer_id", name: "Pyth Pro ID", isRowHeader: true },
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit maybe ux wise if this is going to be sorted by it should be the first column in the table?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thought about it before. Since the pyth_pro_id starts from 1 and sequentially incremented, it can confused with the index. Sicne folks try to read the symbol and description and then refer to the pro_id, it would be better we keep it on the right side.

@aditya520 aditya520 merged commit 711cd31 into main Nov 13, 2025
10 checks passed
@aditya520 aditya520 deleted the feat(dev-hub)-move-pyth-pro branch November 13, 2025 14:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants