@@ -661,6 +661,26 @@ sequence is empty.");
661661
662662/* lru_cache object **********************************************************/
663663
664+ /* There are four principal algorithmic differences from the pure python version:
665+
666+ 1). The C version relies on the GIL instead of having its own reentrant lock.
667+
668+ 2). The prev/next link fields use borrowed references.
669+
670+ 3). For a full cache, the pure python version rotates the location of the
671+ root entry so that it never has to move individual links and it can
672+ limit updates to just the key and result fields. However, in the C
673+ version, links are temporarily removed while the cache dict updates are
674+ occurring. Afterwards, they are appended or prepended back into the
675+ doubly-linked lists.
676+
677+ 4) In the Python version, the _HashSeq class is used to prevent __hash__
678+ from being called more than once. In the C version, the "known hash"
679+ variants of dictionary calls as used to the same effect.
680+
681+ */
682+
683+
664684/* this object is used delimit args and keywords in the cache keys */
665685static PyObject * kwd_mark = NULL ;
666686
@@ -1009,14 +1029,15 @@ bounded_lru_cache_wrapper(lru_cache_object *self, PyObject *args, PyObject *kwds
10091029 link = self -> root .next ;
10101030 lru_cache_extract_link (link );
10111031 /* Remove it from the cache.
1012- The cache dict holds one reference to the link,
1013- and the linked list holds yet one reference to it. */
1032+ The cache dict holds one reference to the link.
1033+ We created one other reference when the link was created.
1034+ The linked list only has borrowed references. */
10141035 popresult = _PyDict_Pop_KnownHash (self -> cache , link -> key ,
10151036 link -> hash , Py_None );
10161037 if (popresult == Py_None ) {
10171038 /* Getting here means that the user function call or another
10181039 thread has already removed the old key from the dictionary.
1019- This link is now an orpan . Since we don't want to leave the
1040+ This link is now an orphan . Since we don't want to leave the
10201041 cache in an inconsistent state, we don't restore the link. */
10211042 Py_DECREF (popresult );
10221043 Py_DECREF (link );
@@ -1048,7 +1069,7 @@ bounded_lru_cache_wrapper(lru_cache_object *self, PyObject *args, PyObject *kwds
10481069 prev and next fields set to valid values. We have to wait
10491070 for successful insertion in the cache dict before adding the
10501071 link to the linked list. Otherwise, the potentially reentrant
1051- __eq__ call could cause the then ophan link to be visited. */
1072+ __eq__ call could cause the then orphan link to be visited. */
10521073 if (_PyDict_SetItem_KnownHash (self -> cache , key , (PyObject * )link ,
10531074 hash ) < 0 ) {
10541075 /* Somehow the cache dict update failed. We no longer can
0 commit comments