Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Commit cc8f44b

Browse files
committed
Split "Extending & Embedding" into separate files, one per chapter.
1 parent 1ba6bad commit cc8f44b

7 files changed

Lines changed: 3160 additions & 3158 deletions

File tree

Doc/Makefile.deps

Lines changed: 5 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -26,6 +26,11 @@ DOCFILES= $(HOWTOSTYLES) \
2626
doc/doc.tex
2727

2828
EXTFILES= ext/ext.tex $(MANSTYLES) $(INDEXSTYLES) $(COMMONTEX) \
29+
ext/extending.tex \
30+
ext/newtypes.tex \
31+
ext/unix.tex \
32+
ext/windows.tex \
33+
ext/embedding.tex \
2934
texinputs/reportingbugs.tex
3035

3136
TUTFILES= tut/tut.tex $(MANSTYLES) $(COMMONTEX)

Doc/ext/embedding.tex

Lines changed: 317 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,317 @@
1+
\chapter{Embedding Python in Another Application
2+
\label{embedding}}
3+
4+
The previous chapters discussed how to extend Python, that is, how to
5+
extend the functionality of Python by attaching a library of C
6+
functions to it. It is also possible to do it the other way around:
7+
enrich your C/\Cpp{} application by embedding Python in it. Embedding
8+
provides your application with the ability to implement some of the
9+
functionality of your application in Python rather than C or \Cpp.
10+
This can be used for many purposes; one example would be to allow
11+
users to tailor the application to their needs by writing some scripts
12+
in Python. You can also use it yourself if some of the functionality
13+
can be written in Python more easily.
14+
15+
Embedding Python is similar to extending it, but not quite. The
16+
difference is that when you extend Python, the main program of the
17+
application is still the Python interpreter, while if you embed
18+
Python, the main program may have nothing to do with Python ---
19+
instead, some parts of the application occasionally call the Python
20+
interpreter to run some Python code.
21+
22+
So if you are embedding Python, you are providing your own main
23+
program. One of the things this main program has to do is initialize
24+
the Python interpreter. At the very least, you have to call the
25+
function \cfunction{Py_Initialize()} (on Mac OS, call
26+
\cfunction{PyMac_Initialize()} instead). There are optional calls to
27+
pass command line arguments to Python. Then later you can call the
28+
interpreter from any part of the application.
29+
30+
There are several different ways to call the interpreter: you can pass
31+
a string containing Python statements to
32+
\cfunction{PyRun_SimpleString()}, or you can pass a stdio file pointer
33+
and a file name (for identification in error messages only) to
34+
\cfunction{PyRun_SimpleFile()}. You can also call the lower-level
35+
operations described in the previous chapters to construct and use
36+
Python objects.
37+
38+
A simple demo of embedding Python can be found in the directory
39+
\file{Demo/embed/} of the source distribution.
40+
41+
42+
\begin{seealso}
43+
\seetitle[../api/api.html]{Python/C API Reference Manual}{The
44+
details of Python's C interface are given in this manual.
45+
A great deal of necessary information can be found here.}
46+
\end{seealso}
47+
48+
49+
\section{Very High Level Embedding
50+
\label{high-level-embedding}}
51+
52+
The simplest form of embedding Python is the use of the very
53+
high level interface. This interface is intended to execute a
54+
Python script without needing to interact with the application
55+
directly. This can for example be used to perform some operation
56+
on a file.
57+
58+
\begin{verbatim}
59+
#include <Python.h>
60+
61+
int main()
62+
{
63+
Py_Initialize();
64+
PyRun_SimpleString("from time import time,ctime\n"
65+
"print 'Today is',ctime(time())\n");
66+
Py_Finalize();
67+
return 0;
68+
}
69+
\end{verbatim}
70+
71+
The above code first initializes the Python interpreter with
72+
\cfunction{Py_Initialize()}, followed by the execution of a hard-coded
73+
Python script that print the date and time. Afterwards, the
74+
\cfunction{Py_Finalize()} call shuts the interpreter down, followed by
75+
the end of the program. In a real program, you may want to get the
76+
Python script from another source, perhaps a text-editor routine, a
77+
file, or a database. Getting the Python code from a file can better
78+
be done by using the \cfunction{PyRun_SimpleFile()} function, which
79+
saves you the trouble of allocating memory space and loading the file
80+
contents.
81+
82+
83+
\section{Beyond Very High Level Embedding: An overview
84+
\label{lower-level-embedding}}
85+
86+
The high level interface gives you the ability to execute
87+
arbitrary pieces of Python code from your application, but
88+
exchanging data values is quite cumbersome to say the least. If
89+
you want that, you should use lower level calls. At the cost of
90+
having to write more C code, you can achieve almost anything.
91+
92+
It should be noted that extending Python and embedding Python
93+
is quite the same activity, despite the different intent. Most
94+
topics discussed in the previous chapters are still valid. To
95+
show this, consider what the extension code from Python to C
96+
really does:
97+
98+
\begin{enumerate}
99+
\item Convert data values from Python to C,
100+
\item Perform a function call to a C routine using the
101+
converted values, and
102+
\item Convert the data values from the call from C to Python.
103+
\end{enumerate}
104+
105+
When embedding Python, the interface code does:
106+
107+
\begin{enumerate}
108+
\item Convert data values from C to Python,
109+
\item Perform a function call to a Python interface routine
110+
using the converted values, and
111+
\item Convert the data values from the call from Python to C.
112+
\end{enumerate}
113+
114+
As you can see, the data conversion steps are simply swapped to
115+
accomodate the different direction of the cross-language transfer.
116+
The only difference is the routine that you call between both
117+
data conversions. When extending, you call a C routine, when
118+
embedding, you call a Python routine.
119+
120+
This chapter will not discuss how to convert data from Python
121+
to C and vice versa. Also, proper use of references and dealing
122+
with errors is assumed to be understood. Since these aspects do not
123+
differ from extending the interpreter, you can refer to earlier
124+
chapters for the required information.
125+
126+
127+
\section{Pure Embedding
128+
\label{pure-embedding}}
129+
130+
The first program aims to execute a function in a Python
131+
script. Like in the section about the very high level interface,
132+
the Python interpreter does not directly interact with the
133+
application (but that will change in th next section).
134+
135+
The code to run a function defined in a Python script is:
136+
137+
\verbatiminput{run-func.c}
138+
139+
This code loads a Python script using \code{argv[1]}, and calls the
140+
function named in \code{argv[2]}. Its integer arguments are the other
141+
values of the \code{argv} array. If you compile and link this
142+
program (let's call the finished executable \program{call}), and use
143+
it to execute a Python script, such as:
144+
145+
\begin{verbatim}
146+
def multiply(a,b):
147+
print "Thy shall add", a, "times", b
148+
c = 0
149+
for i in range(0, a):
150+
c = c + b
151+
return c
152+
\end{verbatim}
153+
154+
then the result should be:
155+
156+
\begin{verbatim}
157+
$ call multiply 3 2
158+
Thy shall add 3 times 2
159+
Result of call: 6
160+
\end{verbatim} % $
161+
162+
Although the program is quite large for its functionality, most of the
163+
code is for data conversion between Python and C, and for error
164+
reporting. The interesting part with respect to embedding Python
165+
starts with
166+
167+
\begin{verbatim}
168+
Py_Initialize();
169+
pName = PyString_FromString(argv[1]);
170+
/* Error checking of pName left out */
171+
pModule = PyImport_Import(pName);
172+
\end{verbatim}
173+
174+
After initializing the interpreter, the script is loaded using
175+
\cfunction{PyImport_Import()}. This routine needs a Python string
176+
as its argument, which is constructed using the
177+
\cfunction{PyString_FromString()} data conversion routine.
178+
179+
\begin{verbatim}
180+
pDict = PyModule_GetDict(pModule);
181+
/* pDict is a borrowed reference */
182+
183+
pFunc = PyDict_GetItemString(pDict, argv[2]);
184+
/* pFun is a borrowed reference */
185+
186+
if (pFunc && PyCallable_Check(pFunc)) {
187+
...
188+
}
189+
\end{verbatim}
190+
191+
Once the script is loaded, its dictionary is retrieved with
192+
\cfunction{PyModule_GetDict()}. The dictionary is then searched using
193+
the normal dictionary access routines for the function name. If the
194+
name exists, and the object retunred is callable, you can safely
195+
assume that it is a function. The program then proceeds by
196+
constructing a tuple of arguments as normal. The call to the python
197+
function is then made with:
198+
199+
\begin{verbatim}
200+
pValue = PyObject_CallObject(pFunc, pArgs);
201+
\end{verbatim}
202+
203+
Upon return of the function, \code{pValue} is either \NULL{} or it
204+
contains a reference to the return value of the function. Be sure to
205+
release the reference after examining the value.
206+
207+
208+
\section{Extending Embedded Python
209+
\label{extending-with-embedding}}
210+
211+
Until now, the embedded Python interpreter had no access to
212+
functionality from the application itself. The Python API allows this
213+
by extending the embedded interpreter. That is, the embedded
214+
interpreter gets extended with routines provided by the application.
215+
While it sounds complex, it is not so bad. Simply forget for a while
216+
that the application starts the Python interpreter. Instead, consider
217+
the application to be a set of subroutines, and write some glue code
218+
that gives Python access to those routines, just like you would write
219+
a normal Python extension. For example:
220+
221+
\begin{verbatim}
222+
static int numargs=0;
223+
224+
/* Return the number of arguments of the application command line */
225+
static PyObject*
226+
emb_numargs(PyObject *self, PyObject *args)
227+
{
228+
if(!PyArg_ParseTuple(args, ":numargs"))
229+
return NULL;
230+
return Py_BuildValue("i", numargs);
231+
}
232+
233+
static PyMethodDef EmbMethods[]={
234+
{"numargs", emb_numargs, METH_VARARGS},
235+
{NULL, NULL}
236+
};
237+
\end{verbatim}
238+
239+
Insert the above code just above the \cfunction{main()} function.
240+
Also, insert the following two statements directly after
241+
\cfunction{Py_Initialize()}:
242+
243+
\begin{verbatim}
244+
numargs = argc;
245+
Py_InitModule("emb", EmbMethods);
246+
\end{verbatim}
247+
248+
These two lines initialize the \code{numargs} variable, and make the
249+
\function{emb.numargs()} function accessible to the embedded Python
250+
interpreter. With these extensions, the Python script can do things
251+
like
252+
253+
\begin{verbatim}
254+
import emb
255+
print "Number of arguments", emb.numargs()
256+
\end{verbatim}
257+
258+
In a real application, the methods will expose an API of the
259+
application to Python.
260+
261+
262+
%\section{For the future}
263+
%
264+
%You don't happen to have a nice library to get textual
265+
%equivalents of numeric values do you :-) ?
266+
%Callbacks here ? (I may be using information from that section
267+
%?!)
268+
%threads
269+
%code examples do not really behave well if errors happen
270+
% (what to watch out for)
271+
272+
273+
\section{Embedding Python in \Cpp{}
274+
\label{embeddingInCplusplus}}
275+
276+
It is also possible to embed Python in a \Cpp{} program; precisely how this
277+
is done will depend on the details of the \Cpp{} system used; in general you
278+
will need to write the main program in \Cpp{}, and use the \Cpp{} compiler
279+
to compile and link your program. There is no need to recompile Python
280+
itself using \Cpp{}.
281+
282+
283+
\section{Linking Requirements
284+
\label{link-reqs}}
285+
286+
While the \program{configure} script shipped with the Python sources
287+
will correctly build Python to export the symbols needed by
288+
dynamically linked extensions, this is not automatically inherited by
289+
applications which embed the Python library statically, at least on
290+
\UNIX. This is an issue when the application is linked to the static
291+
runtime library (\file{libpython.a}) and needs to load dynamic
292+
extensions (implemented as \file{.so} files).
293+
294+
The problem is that some entry points are defined by the Python
295+
runtime solely for extension modules to use. If the embedding
296+
application does not use any of these entry points, some linkers will
297+
not include those entries in the symbol table of the finished
298+
executable. Some additional options are needed to inform the linker
299+
not to remove these symbols.
300+
301+
Determining the right options to use for any given platform can be
302+
quite difficult, but fortunately the Python configuration already has
303+
those values. To retrieve them from an installed Python interpreter,
304+
start an interactive interpreter and have a short session like this:
305+
306+
\begin{verbatim}
307+
>>> import distutils.sysconfig
308+
>>> distutils.sysconfig.get_config_var('LINKFORSHARED')
309+
'-Xlinker -export-dynamic'
310+
\end{verbatim}
311+
\refstmodindex{distutils.sysconfig}
312+
313+
The contents of the string presented will be the options that should
314+
be used. If the string is empty, there's no need to add any
315+
additional options. The \constant{LINKFORSHARED} definition
316+
corresponds to the variable of the same name in Python's top-level
317+
\file{Makefile}.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)