Feature or enhancement
Proposal:
Use-case
Someone works in an organisation with a custom log formatter. They want to make assertions about logs in a particular test and would like the assertions to match the format used in the org. Currently the format is static in assertLogs.
Example usage
format = "[No.1: the larch] %(levelname)s:%(name)s:%(message)s"
formatter = logging.Formatter(format)
with self.assertLogs(formatter=formatter) as cm:
log_foo.info("1")
log_foobar.debug("2")
self.assertEqual(cm.output, ["[No.1: the larch] INFO:foo:1"])Proposed change
My branch already has my proposed change and tests are passing. Since this would be my first contribution if accepted I'm raising the issue since I don't yet have a feel for what constitutes a "minor" enhancement that doesn't need an issue ref per the developer guide. Having raised this I'll create a PR as per the developer guide.
Has this already been discussed elsewhere?
This is a minor feature, which does not need previous discussion elsewhere
Links to previous discussion of this feature:
No response
Linked PRs
Feature or enhancement
Proposal:
Use-case
Someone works in an organisation with a custom log formatter. They want to make assertions about logs in a particular test and would like the assertions to match the format used in the org. Currently the format is static in assertLogs.
Example usage
Proposed change
My branch already has my proposed change and tests are passing. Since this would be my first contribution if accepted I'm raising the issue since I don't yet have a feel for what constitutes a "minor" enhancement that doesn't need an issue ref per the developer guide. Having raised this I'll create a PR as per the developer guide.
Has this already been discussed elsewhere?
This is a minor feature, which does not need previous discussion elsewhere
Links to previous discussion of this feature:
No response
Linked PRs