gh-74468: Fix a mis-taken source of tarfile extracted names#102424
Merged
ethanfurman merged 2 commits intopython:mainfrom Mar 27, 2023
Merged
gh-74468: Fix a mis-taken source of tarfile extracted names#102424ethanfurman merged 2 commits intopython:mainfrom
ethanfurman merged 2 commits intopython:mainfrom
Conversation
svisser
reviewed
Mar 5, 2023
Co-authored-by: Simeon Visser <[email protected]>
erlend-aasland
approved these changes
Mar 22, 2023
Contributor
erlend-aasland
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Based on previous discussion, this looks good to me.
ethanfurman
approved these changes
Mar 27, 2023
warsaw
pushed a commit
to warsaw/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 11, 2023
pythonGH-102424) Co-authored-by: Simeon Visser <[email protected]>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Supersedes gh-1483. Does the same but in a simpler way due to missing CLA there.
@auvipy @iritkatriel @erlend-aasland as reviewers of the original PR.