Thanks for the PR. The 'token' term is not being explained (even by means of reference) or even mentioned earlier in the tutorial, maybe it can be a good point to add a reference as well?

(interactive.rst is chapter 14; this is chapter 8 and hence earlier.) This paragraph already used "token"; I used it a second time. There is no entry in the glossary; I guess beginning programmers are expected to understand 'token' as in 'tokenizer', but I can see that might be too much. Do you think '(code unit)' would help?

(interactive.rst is chapter 14; this is chapter 8 and hence earlier.) This paragraph already used "token"; I used it a second time. There is no entry in the glossary; I guess beginning programmers are expected to understand 'token' as in 'tokenizer', but I can see that might be too much. Do you think '(code unit)' would help?

I am not sure, maybe we even need to separate this issue.

As a potential solution, we can add another entry in the glossary to shortly provide a basic intuition for a token/code unit. In general, introduction of the term might be of use to explain some concepts, such as error highlighting/handling, syntax. Maybe it would even make sense to introduce it right in this chapter along with error handling.

But all that is just my opinion and I would like to see other perspectives on this question.

Thanks @terryjreedy for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.11, 3.12.
🐍🍒⛏🤖 I'm not a witch! I'm not a witch!

I am merging as is to fix the issue. Defining the already used word, 'token', if really needed, is a different issue.

GH-116624 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.12 branch.

GH-116625 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.11 branch.

Thanks @terryjreedy for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.11.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

Thanks @terryjreedy for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.12.
🐍🍒⛏🤖