Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Fix inconsistent set ordering in annotations (GH-133682) #133702

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
May 9, 2025

Conversation

akshat62
Copy link
Contributor

@akshat62 akshat62 commented May 8, 2025

@akshat62 akshat62 requested a review from JelleZijlstra as a code owner May 8, 2025 19:14
@python-cla-bot
Copy link

python-cla-bot bot commented May 8, 2025

All commit authors signed the Contributor License Agreement.

CLA signed

@bedevere-app
Copy link

bedevere-app bot commented May 8, 2025

Most changes to Python require a NEWS entry. Add one using the blurb_it web app or the blurb command-line tool.

If this change has little impact on Python users, wait for a maintainer to apply the skip news label instead.

@bedevere-app
Copy link

bedevere-app bot commented May 8, 2025

Most changes to Python require a NEWS entry. Add one using the blurb_it web app or the blurb command-line tool.

If this change has little impact on Python users, wait for a maintainer to apply the skip news label instead.

@akshat62 akshat62 marked this pull request as draft May 8, 2025 19:22
@akshat62 akshat62 marked this pull request as ready for review May 8, 2025 19:33
@akshat62 akshat62 force-pushed the issue-133682-fix-set-ordering branch from 0502f3e to c952b12 Compare May 8, 2025 19:47
@akshat62 akshat62 marked this pull request as draft May 8, 2025 19:51
@bedevere-app
Copy link

bedevere-app bot commented May 8, 2025

Most changes to Python require a NEWS entry. Add one using the blurb_it web app or the blurb command-line tool.

If this change has little impact on Python users, wait for a maintainer to apply the skip news label instead.

@akshat62 akshat62 marked this pull request as ready for review May 8, 2025 20:09
@akshat62 akshat62 requested a review from terryjreedy May 8, 2025 20:10
@bedevere-app
Copy link

bedevere-app bot commented May 9, 2025

Most changes to Python require a NEWS entry. Add one using the blurb_it web app or the blurb command-line tool.

If this change has little impact on Python users, wait for a maintainer to apply the skip news label instead.

@bedevere-app
Copy link

bedevere-app bot commented May 9, 2025

Most changes to Python require a NEWS entry. Add one using the blurb_it web app or the blurb command-line tool.

If this change has little impact on Python users, wait for a maintainer to apply the skip news label instead.

@akshat62
Copy link
Contributor Author

akshat62 commented May 9, 2025

I have made the requested changes; please review again

@bedevere-app
Copy link

bedevere-app bot commented May 9, 2025

Thanks for making the requested changes!

@JelleZijlstra: please review the changes made to this pull request.

@bedevere-app bedevere-app bot requested a review from JelleZijlstra May 9, 2025 04:11
@methane methane removed their request for review May 9, 2025 04:14
@akshat62
Copy link
Contributor Author

akshat62 commented May 9, 2025

I have made the requested changes; please review again

@bedevere-app
Copy link

bedevere-app bot commented May 9, 2025

Thanks for making the requested changes!

@JelleZijlstra: please review the changes made to this pull request.

@akshat62
Copy link
Contributor Author

akshat62 commented May 9, 2025

How to re-trigger failing checks ?

@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra added the needs backport to 3.14 bugs and security fixes label May 9, 2025
@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra merged commit a2a0fa9 into python:main May 9, 2025
44 of 45 checks passed
@miss-islington-app
Copy link

Thanks @akshat62 for the PR, and @JelleZijlstra for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.14.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request May 9, 2025
@bedevere-app
Copy link

bedevere-app bot commented May 9, 2025

GH-133754 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.14 branch.

@bedevere-app bedevere-app bot removed the needs backport to 3.14 bugs and security fixes label May 9, 2025
JelleZijlstra pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 9, 2025
…GH-133702) (#133754)

gh-133682: Fix inconsistent set ordering in annotationlib test (GH-133702)
(cherry picked from commit a2a0fa9)

Co-authored-by: Akshat Gupta <[email protected]>
@akshat62 akshat62 deleted the issue-133682-fix-set-ordering branch May 9, 2025 16:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants