Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

gh-118234: Avoid socket failure with missing SYSTEMROOT env var on Windows #134363

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

jhohm
Copy link
Contributor

@jhohm jhohm commented May 20, 2025

Resolves #118234 by checking for the SystemRoot environment variable and, if it is missing, setting it based on GetWindowsDirectoryW.

As described in the issue, the default path of the provider DLL is stored in the registry as "%SystemRoot%\System32\mswsock.dll" which does not resolve without SystemRoot set (typically to "C:\Windows").

jhohm added 3 commits May 20, 2025 12:25
Resolves python#118234 by checking for the SystemRoot environment variable
and, if it is missing, setting it based on GetWindowsDirectoryW.

As described in the issue, the default path of the provider DLL is
stored in the registry as "%SystemRoot%\System32\mswsock.dll" which does
not resolve without SystemRoot set (typically to "C:\Windows").
@vstinner
Copy link
Member

I don't think that it's a good idea to set SYSTEMROOT environment variable on import socket. It's a surprising side effect. I suspect that other Python stdlib modules don't work well without SYSTEMROOT.

cc @zooba

@zooba
Copy link
Member

zooba commented May 20, 2025

Yeah, I don't love this, and certainly not as part of socketmodule. It might make sense in python.c, to detect whenever someone launches Python with an empty environment, but it's probably even better in subprocess to warn people before they launch with an empty environment.

In my experience, this only ever happens when launching from Python. I've not seen any other language cause it. This list linked in the bug has the main ones, and we should probably just ensure that subprocess always sets them if the caller omits them.

@jhohm
Copy link
Contributor Author

jhohm commented May 21, 2025

Sent gh-134435 instead.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

sockets and asyncio on Windows depend on SYSTEMROOT env var
3 participants