Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

gh-135755: Document the new PyFunction_GET_BUILTINS macro #135934

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ZeroIntensity
Copy link
Member

@ZeroIntensity ZeroIntensity commented Jun 25, 2025

Comment on lines +150 to +152
This function cannot fail and does not do error checking; passing anything
other than an instance of :c:data:`PyFunction_Type` is undefined behavior.
There is no ``PyFunction_Get*`` equivalent for this function.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hm, I don't think C API WG would approve.
Should this function be in a private header (and with an underscore) instead? It looks untested as well.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's sort of tested. I'm not opposed to making it private.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That looks like it's used in a test -- the test assumes that it's working?
Yeah, the more I look into it, the better making it private seems.

cc @ericsnowcurrently, who added PyFunction_GET_BUILTINS in #133128

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll put up an alternate PR.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FWIW, I agree with making it internal-only.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Status: Todo
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants