Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
bpo-38671: Make sure to return an absolute path in pathlib._WindowsFlavour.resolve() #17716
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bpo-38671: Make sure to return an absolute path in pathlib._WindowsFlavour.resolve() #17716
Changes from all commits
e503cd6
3f9d1b8
612b7f6
7cff82e
8f20c10
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Lines 189-191 make a bad assumption that the current working directory (CWD) is a final path. The CWD is an absolute path but not a final path. The assignment should be something like
s = str(path) or '.'
. In practice it may never be an issue sincePurePath.__str__
assigns and returnsself._str = self._format_parsed_parts(self._drv, self._root, self._parts) or '.'
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
TIL.
I like the
or '.'
approach since it avoids special-casing things, but want @pitrou to take a look since this is inherited from the initial pathlib implementation.