Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

[3.5] bpo-29554: Improve docs for pstat module and profile. (#88) #228

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 22, 2017

Conversation

berkerpeksag
Copy link
Member

Clarify that methods take a string which is interpreted as a regex,
not a regex object.

Also clarify what the old -1, 0, 1 and 2 options were.

(cherry picked from commit 8fb1f6e)

Clarify that methods take a string which is interpreted as a regex,
not a regex object.

Also clarify what the old `-1`, `0`, `1` and `2` options were.
(cherry picked from commit 8fb1f6e)
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 22, 2017

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (3.5@9ab8eaf). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##             3.5     #228   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage       ?   82.41%           
======================================
  Files          ?     1404           
  Lines          ?   341454           
  Branches       ?        0           
======================================
  Hits           ?   281423           
  Misses         ?    60031           
  Partials       ?        0
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
Lib/pstats.py 58.72% <ø> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9ab8eaf...7661098. Read the comment docs.

@berkerpeksag berkerpeksag merged commit 6336f0d into python:3.5 Feb 22, 2017
@berkerpeksag berkerpeksag deleted the 88-backport-3.5 branch February 22, 2017 01:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants