-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31.9k
bpo-41370: Evaluate strings as forward refs in PEP 585 generics #30900
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e820e3a
convert strings in PEP 585 generic aliases (`types.GenericAlias`) to …
NiklasRosenstein d7f57c7
add unittest for new get_type_hints() behaviour on PEP 585 generics w…
NiklasRosenstein 26ab740
add unit test for `from __future__ import annotations`
NiklasRosenstein a04bd5d
add test for recursive type
NiklasRosenstein 3416713
📜🤖 Added by blurb_it.
blurb-it[bot] 30a3564
Double backticks because RST.
NiklasRosenstein 13a3505
Update Lib/typing.py
NiklasRosenstein 33d286a
Update Misc/NEWS.d/next/Library/2022-01-27-11-54-16.bpo-41370.gYxCPE.rst
NiklasRosenstein 6cd96b1
Merge branch 'main' into issue41370
NiklasRosenstein 39c5b06
Replace assertIs with assertEqual in test_get_type_hints_annotated
NiklasRosenstein File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions
1
Misc/NEWS.d/next/Library/2022-01-27-11-54-16.bpo-41370.gYxCPE.rst
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
:func:`typing.get_type_hints` now supports evaluating strings as forward references in :ref:`PEP 585 generic aliases <types-genericalias>`. |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we need to pass
globals
andlocals
toForwardRef
here? 🤔There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I may not be knowledgable enough about the typing code base, but I don't see a globals/locals argument for
ForwardRef
. Do you mean the module? I couldn't find out how to use/what to pass to that argument exactly.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's too late for that anyway. The ForwardRef class has an optional module= argument which may be used to resolve references, but the best we could do at this point is passing
globalns.get("__name__")
, which would just end up with the same globalns as we are using anyway.This suggests there could still be scenarios where this will fail, esp. when a type alias defined in one module is used in another. But that would only be solvable by recording the module at the time the alias is being defined, and we've already said we wouldn't go that far (since it would require a ForwardRef implementation in C).