Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

PEP 788: Address feedback from the C API WG #4521

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Sep 17, 2025
Merged

PEP 788: Address feedback from the C API WG #4521

merged 14 commits into from
Sep 17, 2025
+105 −69

Conversation

ZeroIntensity
Copy link
Member

@ZeroIntensity ZeroIntensity commented Aug 3, 2025 •
edited
Loading

  • Change is either:
    • To a Draft PEP
    • To an Accepted or Final PEP, with Steering Council approval
    • To fix an editorial issue (markup, typo, link, header, etc)
  • PR title prefixed with PEP number (e.g. PEP 123: Summary of changes)

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--4521.org.readthedocs.build/pep-0788/

@ZeroIntensity ZeroIntensity requested a review from vstinner as a code owner August 3, 2025 16:21
@ZeroIntensity ZeroIntensity mentioned this pull request Aug 3, 2025
Open
@ZeroIntensity
Copy link
Member Author

@AA-Turner Did I break something here, or is readthedocs acting up? Sphinx is building without warnings for me locally.

@AA-Turner
Copy link
Member 

WARNING: failed to reach any of the inventories with the following issues:
62	intersphinx inventory 'https://packaging.python.org/en/latest//objects.inv' not fetchable due to <class 'requests.exceptions.HTTPError'>: 530 Server Error:  for url: https://packaging.python.org/en/latest//objects.inv

From Line 60; the lack of packaging cross reference targets is the cause of the failure.

A

@hugovk
Copy link
Member

hugovk commented Aug 4, 2025

I restarted it and it passed this time:

https://app.readthedocs.org/projects/pep-previews/builds/29079852/

vstinner
vstinner reviewed Aug 4, 2025
View reviewed changes
vstinner
vstinner reviewed Aug 4, 2025
View reviewed changes
vstinner
vstinner reviewed Aug 4, 2025
View reviewed changes
@ZeroIntensity ZeroIntensity merged commit 89421e7 into python:main Sep 17, 2025
5 checks passed
@ZeroIntensity ZeroIntensity deleted the pep-788-third-round branch September 17, 2025 11:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@vstinner vstinner vstinner left review comments

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@ZeroIntensity @AA-Turner @hugovk @vstinner