-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
Bump influxdb-client to 1.39.* #11116
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,19 +1,17 @@ | ||
from _typeshed import Incomplete | ||
from typing import Any, ClassVar | ||
|
||
from influxdb_client.domain.links import Links | ||
from influxdb_client.domain.task import Task | ||
|
||
class Tasks: | ||
openapi_types: Incomplete | ||
attribute_map: Incomplete | ||
discriminator: Incomplete | ||
def __init__(self, links: Incomplete | None = None, tasks: Incomplete | None = None) -> None: ... | ||
@property | ||
def links(self): ... | ||
@links.setter | ||
def links(self, links) -> None: ... | ||
@property | ||
def tasks(self): ... | ||
@tasks.setter | ||
def tasks(self, tasks) -> None: ... | ||
def to_dict(self): ... | ||
def to_str(self): ... | ||
def __eq__(self, other): ... | ||
def __ne__(self, other): ... | ||
openapi_types: ClassVar[dict[str, str]] | ||
attribute_map: ClassVar[dict[str, str]] | ||
|
||
tasks: list[Task] | ||
links: Links | ||
discriminator: None | ||
def __init__(self, links: Links | None = None, tasks: list[Task] | None = None) -> None: ... | ||
def to_dict(self) -> dict[str, Any]: ... | ||
def to_str(self) -> str: ... | ||
def __eq__(self, other: object) -> bool: ... | ||
def __ne__(self, other: object) -> bool: ... |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wanna know your opinion on this: Even though it's undocumented in this specific method, all other kwargs are passed directly to
TasksService.get_tasks
, would it be simpler to keep track if the definitions were all just the same? You also wouldn't have a partially unknown**kwargs
.I think this definition could be improved either way:
TasksService.get_tasks
is also overloaded based onasync_req
. Passingasync_req=True
inTasksApi.find_tasks
would fail because.tasks
would be called on aApplyResult
. The current definition ofTasksApi.find_tasks
with**kwargs
allows that. We could enforceasync_req: Literal[False] = ...
here.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was debating this. Technically, you can pass all those arguments to it, even
async_req
, but I'm not sure this is actually intended. Especially in the case ofasync_req
.Maybe @bednar could provide some insight: Should the functions in
_api.py
that callcall_api
under the hood accept the additional keyword arguments thatcall_api
accepts? Includingasync_req
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The purpose of passing
**kwargs
from_api.py
to_service.py
is to provide a flexible way to forward query parameters to HTTP requests. This design allows any number of additional keyword arguments (parameters) to be passed through the API layer directly to the service layer, which then constructs and executes the HTTP request