Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

ci: use gitlab-runner:v17.7.1 for the CI #3093

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 22, 2025
Merged

Conversation

JohnVillalovos
Copy link
Member

@JohnVillalovos JohnVillalovos commented Jan 21, 2025

The latest gitlab-runner image does not have the gitlab-runner user and it causes our tests to fail.

Closes: #3091

@JohnVillalovos JohnVillalovos force-pushed the jlvillal/version_gitlab_runner branch 2 times, most recently from 285208c to 8cb5939 Compare January 22, 2025 00:00
The `latest` gitlab-runner image does not have the `gitlab-runner`
user and it causes our tests to fail.

Closes: #3091
@JohnVillalovos JohnVillalovos force-pushed the jlvillal/version_gitlab_runner branch from 8cb5939 to 553f5b0 Compare January 22, 2025 00:08
@JohnVillalovos JohnVillalovos changed the title ci: use gitlab-runner:ubuntu-v17.7.1 for the CI ci: use gitlab-runner:v17.7.1 for the CI Jan 22, 2025
@JohnVillalovos JohnVillalovos requested a review from nejch January 22, 2025 00:24
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 22, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.72%. Comparing base (671e711) to head (5e169be).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3093      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   93.57%   96.72%   +3.14%     
==========================================
  Files          96       96              
  Lines        6291     6291              
==========================================
+ Hits         5887     6085     +198     
+ Misses        404      206     -198     
Flag Coverage Δ
api_func_v4 82.89% <ø> (-0.05%) ⬇️
cli_func_v4 82.91% <ø> (?)
unit 89.15% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 11 files with indirect coverage changes

Copy link
Member

@nejch nejch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @JohnVillalovos, looks good, just a question about the prints?

@JohnVillalovos JohnVillalovos force-pushed the jlvillal/version_gitlab_runner branch from 3010530 to 19573b4 Compare January 22, 2025 15:55
@JohnVillalovos JohnVillalovos requested a review from nejch January 22, 2025 15:57
@JohnVillalovos JohnVillalovos force-pushed the jlvillal/version_gitlab_runner branch from 19573b4 to bf0e534 Compare January 22, 2025 16:25
@JohnVillalovos JohnVillalovos requested a review from nejch January 22, 2025 16:28
Previously the 'job_with_artifact' fixture could run forever. Now give
it up to 60 seconds to complete before failing.
@JohnVillalovos JohnVillalovos force-pushed the jlvillal/version_gitlab_runner branch from bf0e534 to 5e169be Compare January 22, 2025 16:29
@nejch nejch enabled auto-merge (rebase) January 22, 2025 16:35
@nejch nejch merged commit e4673d8 into main Jan 22, 2025
16 checks passed
@nejch nejch deleted the jlvillal/version_gitlab_runner branch January 22, 2025 16:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

CI: Functional CLI test keeps hanging on GitHub CI.
2 participants