Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Add note to FAQ regarding search referrals #409

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

fredthomsen
Copy link
Contributor

Several posts across the web in regards to this issue, so an additional
note in the answer to this question seems warranted.

Basing this answer on message this message in the mailing list:
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ldap/2014q1/003350.html

Can client code safely assume that a DN of None is always a search referral, because that is what I took from the message linked above?

@fredthomsen fredthomsen force-pushed the additionalSearchRefInfoInFaq branch from ad34b9c to 8814bda Compare April 12, 2021 15:37
droideck
droideck previously approved these changes Apr 12, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@droideck droideck left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Besides that, looks good to me!

@fredthomsen
Copy link
Contributor Author

fredthomsen commented Apr 30, 2021

Besides that, looks good to me!

@droideck updates made.

Several posts across the web in regards to this issue, so an additional
note in the answer to this question seems warranted.

Basing this answer on message this message in the mailing list:
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ldap/2014q1/003350.html
@fredthomsen fredthomsen force-pushed the additionalSearchRefInfoInFaq branch from 651072f to d0b9580 Compare May 9, 2021 00:46
@encukou encukou merged commit 25d0ca0 into python-ldap:master Jun 29, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants