-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 121
Add archive section #293
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Add archive section #293
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ | ||
--- | ||
title: archive | ||
bg: 'white' | ||
--- | ||
|
||
# History | ||
|
||
This page is now an archive of part of the transition from Python 2 to 3. | ||
|
||
By around 2015, when Python 2 support was originally planned to end, many | ||
important Python libraries and tools supported Python 3. But Python 2 still had | ||
a lot of users, and projects needed to support both major versions. The end of | ||
Python 2 support was postponed to 2020, and some people argued that development | ||
of Python 2 should resume. It seemed like a real possibility that the end date | ||
would be postponed again, and we'd need to support two versions of the language | ||
indefinitely. | ||
|
||
The Python 3 statement was drawn up around 2016. Projects pledged to require | ||
Python 3 by 2020, giving other projects confidence that they could plan a similar | ||
transition, and allowing downstream users to figure out their options without a | ||
nasty surprise. We didn't force people to move to Python 3, but if they wanted | ||
to stick with Python 2, they would stop getting new versions of our projects. | ||
The focus was originally on the scientific Python ecosystem, with Jupyter and | ||
matplotlib among the first projects involved, but in late 2017 it was expanded | ||
to any Python projects. | ||
A rapidly growing number of projects signed up as we approached 2020. | ||
|
||
The long-term transition we hoped for has succeeded: in 2024 it is entirely | ||
normal for projects to support only Python 3, simplifying maintainers' lives | ||
and letting us take full advantage of newer language features. | ||
|
||
Thank-you to all of the people, in projects big and small, who contributed | ||
their support to the statement! |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would add a phrase along the lines of "without disrupting users still using Python 2 at the time" maybe ?
Thanks for writing this !
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've sort of mentioned this idea in the previous paragraph:
I don't want to over-sell this, because a) we wanted people in general to move to Python 3, even if Python 2 remained in some specific niches, to re-unify the Python world, and b) I'm sure the end of Python 2 support did disrupt people who needed/wanted to keep using it. Not our statement directly, but things like the removal of Python 2 from Linux distros, and the security concerns for anything that handles untrusted data. The
python_requires
stuff definitely helped to make things less painful, but it was never going to be totally disruption free.