Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

slack, google groups, or gitter channel? #383

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
den-run-ai opened this issue Feb 16, 2017 · 19 comments
Closed

slack, google groups, or gitter channel? #383

den-run-ai opened this issue Feb 16, 2017 · 19 comments

Comments

@den-run-ai
Copy link
Contributor

https://pythonnet.slack.com/

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/pythonnet

@vmuriart
Copy link
Contributor

not google groups. That looks like something still stuck in the 90s.

@vmuriart
Copy link
Contributor

For reference:
https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-pros-and-cons-of-Gitter-vs-Slack
https://stackshare.io/stackups/gitter-vs-hipchat-vs-slack

Looks like Gitter is much more OSS friendly, and Slack would require to invite/request people to join.

Slack has built in integration to AppVeyor/Travis
Gitter can be hacked together to integrate with CI

Slack has a nicer UI.

I'm leaninga bit towards Gitter, but only because of the easier barrier of entry. Otherwise Slack wins.

@den-run-ai
Copy link
Contributor Author

image

@vmuriart
Copy link
Contributor

So support the underdog... 🤓
Slack it is then.

@vmuriart
Copy link
Contributor

On a related note, we should probably try to centralize the info for the repo. ie, should consider closing or adding a notice to https://bitbucket.org/pythonnet/pythonnet/src and http://pythonnet.sourceforge.net/

Too bad http://python.net/ is taken 😢

@den-run-ai
Copy link
Contributor Author

image

@den-run-ai
Copy link
Contributor Author

@vmuriart I just sent a reminder about sourceforge and copied you.

@vmuriart
Copy link
Contributor

Yup, i saw the notice there. I meant we should probably add a link to the official repo. Something similar to https://bitbucket.org/hpk42/tox

@den-run-ai
Copy link
Contributor Author

pythonnet downloads on sourceforge are declining rapidly:

image

@stonebig
Copy link
Contributor

stonebig commented Feb 16, 2017

People can now get a working pythonnet wheel via "pip install pythonnet", don't they ? or via a Python distro.

@vmuriart
Copy link
Contributor

yup. I'm surprised there's any activity on the sourceforge downloads.

@den-run-ai
Copy link
Contributor Author

@stonebig here are all download channels:

https://github.com/pythonnet/pythonnet/wiki/Installation

@vmuriart you will be surprised how much there is legacy python 2.5/2.6

@den-run-ai
Copy link
Contributor Author

I purchased this domain last year:

www.python4.net

@den-run-ai
Copy link
Contributor Author

den-run-ai commented Feb 16, 2017

SELECT
  file.filename,
  COUNT(*) as total_downloads,
FROM
  TABLE_DATE_RANGE(
    [the-psf:pypi.downloads],
    DATE_ADD(CURRENT_TIMESTAMP(), -18, "day"),
    DATE_ADD(CURRENT_TIMESTAMP(), -1, "day")
  )
WHERE
  file.project = 'pythonnet'
AND
  file.filename like '%2.2.2%'
GROUP BY
  file.filename
ORDER BY
  total_downloads DESC
LIMIT 1000

almost 5000 downloads of v2.2.2 in 18 days, all versions over 9000 downloads:

image

@vmuriart
Copy link
Contributor

whoops. Sorry for derailing the topic of this issue. Looks like we are going w Slack then?

@den-run-ai
Copy link
Contributor Author

@vmuriart I'm fine with slack :) I'm going to invite core team. we can add slack tag on readme page later.

@vmuriart
Copy link
Contributor

shields.io doesn't support Slack and I can't find a shield/badge for them. I may generate a generic badge similar to the LICENSE shield.

@vmuriart
Copy link
Contributor

Closed by #384

@den-run-ai
Copy link
Contributor Author

public gitter channel added https://gitter.im/pythonnet/pythonnet

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants