Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

docs: change log to ln in Softplus function and class #146199

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Serenazhu
Copy link

Updated the math formula in the softplus function in torch.nn.functional.py and the Softplus class in torch.nn.modules.activation.py from log to ln for correctness and accuracy.

Updated the math formula in the softplus function in torch.nn.functional.py and the Softplus class in torch.nn.modules.activation.py from log to ln for correctness and accuracy.
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jan 31, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/146199

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 1 New Failure

As of commit be51d15 with merge base 3a4e7a5 (image):

NEW FAILURE - The following job has failed:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Jan 31, 2025

CLA Not Signed

Copy link
Contributor

This PR needs a release notes: label

If your changes are user facing and intended to be a part of release notes, please use a label starting with release notes:.

If not, please add the topic: not user facing label.

To add a label, you can comment to pytorchbot, for example
@pytorchbot label "topic: not user facing"

For more information, see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.

@colesbury colesbury added the triaged This issue has been looked at a team member, and triaged and prioritized into an appropriate module label Jan 31, 2025
@albanD albanD removed their request for review January 31, 2025 23:18
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 1, 2025

Looks like this PR hasn't been updated in a while so we're going to go ahead and mark this as Stale.
Feel free to remove the Stale label if you feel this was a mistake.
If you are unable to remove the Stale label please contact a maintainer in order to do so.
If you want the bot to never mark this PR stale again, add the no-stale label.
Stale pull requests will automatically be closed after 30 days of inactivity.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
open source triaged This issue has been looked at a team member, and triaged and prioritized into an appropriate module
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants