Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Add infra to run CPython tests under Dynamo #150787

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

guilhermeleobas
Copy link
Collaborator

@guilhermeleobas guilhermeleobas commented Apr 7, 2025

[ghstack-poisoned]
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Apr 7, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/150787

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 1 New Failure, 4 Unrelated Failures

As of commit af6313f with merge base b06cbd4 (image):

NEW FAILURE - The following job has failed:

FLAKY - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk:

BROKEN TRUNK - The following jobs failed but was present on the merge base:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

UNSTABLE - The following job is marked as unstable, possibly due to flakiness on trunk:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
@guilhermeleobas guilhermeleobas marked this pull request as ready for review April 9, 2025 18:00
@guilhermeleobas guilhermeleobas requested a review from a team as a code owner April 9, 2025 18:00
Divigroup-RAP pushed a commit to Divigroup-RAP/PYTORCH that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2025
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
@guilhermeleobas guilhermeleobas requested a review from zou3519 April 28, 2025 18:34
@anijain2305 anijain2305 self-requested a review April 28, 2025 18:34
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: 1 mandatory check(s) failed. The first few are:

Dig deeper by viewing the failures on hud

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

Failing merge rule: Core Maintainers

@guilhermeleobas
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@pytorchbot merge -f "url lint failures not related to this PR"

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use -f as last resort and instead consider -i/--ignore-current to continue the merge ignoring current failures. This will allow currently pending tests to finish and report signal before the merge.

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@huydhn
Copy link
Contributor

huydhn commented May 6, 2025

@pytorchbot revert -m 'Sorry for reverting your change but a failed test is showing up in trunk' -c nosignal

GH job link HUD commit link

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot successfully started a revert job. Check the current status here.
Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@guilhermeleobas your PR has been successfully reverted.

pytorchmergebot added a commit that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
This reverts commit 7c96dd8.

Reverted #150787 on behalf of https://github.com/huydhn due to Sorry for reverting your change but a failed test is showing up in trunk ([comment](#150787 (comment)))
@pytorchmergebot pytorchmergebot added Reverted ci-no-td Do not run TD on this PR labels May 6, 2025
[ghstack-poisoned]
guilhermeleobas added a commit that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
ghstack-source-id: 262a7f7
Pull Request resolved: #150787
[ghstack-poisoned]
guilhermeleobas added a commit that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
ghstack-source-id: 4433a4f
Pull Request resolved: #150787
[ghstack-poisoned]
guilhermeleobas added a commit that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
ghstack-source-id: ab813a2
Pull Request resolved: #150787
@guilhermeleobas
Copy link
Collaborator Author

guilhermeleobas commented May 6, 2025

@zou3519, is it ok if I merge this PR with a sanity check failing? The failure is due to the number of lines changed here.

@guilhermeleobas
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@pytorchbot merge -i

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants