Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

[Inductor] Disable layout constraints by default#175330

Closed
PaulZhang12 wants to merge 1 commit into
pytorch:mainfrom
PaulZhang12:export-D93739259
Closed

[Inductor] Disable layout constraints by default#175330
PaulZhang12 wants to merge 1 commit into
pytorch:mainfrom
PaulZhang12:export-D93739259

Conversation

@PaulZhang12
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@PaulZhang12 PaulZhang12 commented Feb 19, 2026

Differential Revision: D93739259

Layout constraints currently fails an internal regional inductor case. Disabling it by default now, as we know there are performance improvements that are gained with turning it on.

cc @voznesenskym @penguinwu @EikanWang @jgong5 @Guobing-Chen @XiaobingSuper @zhuhaozhe @blzheng @wenzhe-nrv @jiayisunx @ipiszy @kadeng @muchulee8 @amjames @chauhang @aakhundov @coconutruben @jataylo

Differential Revision: D93739259
@pytorch-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

pytorch-bot Bot commented Feb 19, 2026

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/175330

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ You can merge normally! (3 Unrelated Failures)

As of commit e0fa267 with merge base a09b29e (image):

FLAKY - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk:

BROKEN TRUNK - The following job failed but was present on the merge base:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

UNSTABLE - The following job is marked as unstable, possibly due to flakiness on trunk:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@pytorch-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

pytorch-bot Bot commented Feb 19, 2026

This PR needs a release notes: label

If your changes are user facing and intended to be a part of release notes, please use a label starting with release notes:.

If not, please add the topic: not user facing label.

To add a label, you can comment to pytorchbot, for example
@pytorchbot label "topic: not user facing"

For more information, see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.

@meta-codesync
Copy link
Copy Markdown

meta-codesync Bot commented Feb 19, 2026

@PaulZhang12 has exported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view the originating Diff in D93739259.

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot Bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Feb 19, 2026
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged)

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

norx1991 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2026
Differential Revision: D93739259

Layout constraints currently fails an internal regional inductor case. Disabling it by default now, as we know there are performance improvements that are gained with turning it on.

Pull Request resolved: #175330
Approved by: https://github.com/eellison
EmanueleCoradin pushed a commit to EmanueleCoradin/pytorch that referenced this pull request Mar 30, 2026
Differential Revision: D93739259

Layout constraints currently fails an internal regional inductor case. Disabling it by default now, as we know there are performance improvements that are gained with turning it on.

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#175330
Approved by: https://github.com/eellison
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants