Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Update pthreadpool to pthreadpool:029c88620802e1361ccf41d1970bd5b07fd6b7bb. #40524

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Update pthreadpool to pthreadpool:029c88620802e1361ccf41d1970bd5b07fd6b7bb. #40524

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

AshkanAliabadi
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@AshkanAliabadi AshkanAliabadi mentioned this pull request Jun 24, 2020
Closed
facebook-github-bot
facebook-github-bot reviewed Jun 24, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@AshkanAliabadi has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@dr-ci
Copy link

dr-ci bot commented Jun 24, 2020 •
edited
Loading

💊 CI failures summary and remediations

As of commit fc29b3f (more details on the Dr. CI page):

  • 1/1 failures introduced in this PR

🕵️ 1 new failure recognized by patterns

The following CI failures do not appear to be due to upstream breakages:

See CircleCI build pytorch_linux_backward_compatibility_check_test (1/1)

Step: "Run tests" (full log | diagnosis details | 🔁 rerun)

Jul 01 04:42:50 The PR is introducing backward incompatible changes to the operator library. Please contact PyTorch team to confirm whether this change is wanted or not. 
Jul 01 04:42:50 processing existing schema:  __str__(__torch__.torch.classes._TorchScriptTesting._StackString _0) -> (str _0) 
Jul 01 04:42:50 processing existing schema:  __init__(__torch__.torch.classes._TorchScriptTesting._PickleTester _0, int[] _1) -> (None _0) 
Jul 01 04:42:50 processing existing schema:  __getstate__(__torch__.torch.classes._TorchScriptTesting._PickleTester _0) -> (int[] _0) 
Jul 01 04:42:50 processing existing schema:  __setstate__(__torch__.torch.classes._TorchScriptTesting._PickleTester _0, int[] _1) -> (None _0) 
Jul 01 04:42:50 processing existing schema:  top(__torch__.torch.classes._TorchScriptTesting._PickleTester _0) -> (int _0) 
Jul 01 04:42:50 processing existing schema:  pop(__torch__.torch.classes._TorchScriptTesting._PickleTester _0) -> (int _0) 
Jul 01 04:42:50 processing existing schema:  get(__torch__.torch.classes._TorchScriptTesting._LiteInterpreterTest _0, Tensor _1) -> (str _0) 
Jul 01 04:42:50 processing existing schema:  __getstate__(__torch__.torch.classes._TorchScriptTesting._LiteInterpreterTest _0) -> (int _0) 
Jul 01 04:42:50 processing existing schema:  __setstate__(__torch__.torch.classes._TorchScriptTesting._LiteInterpreterTest _0, int _1) -> (None _0) 
Jul 01 04:42:50 processing existing schema:  __init__(__torch__.torch.classes.dist_rpc.WorkerInfo _0, str _1, int _2) -> (None _0) 
Jul 01 04:42:50 The PR is introducing backward incompatible changes to the operator library. Please contact PyTorch team to confirm whether this change is wanted or not.  
Jul 01 04:42:50  
Jul 01 04:42:50 Broken ops: [ 
Jul 01 04:42:50 	aten::view_as(Tensor self, Tensor other) -> (Tensor) 
Jul 01 04:42:50 	aten::reshape_as(Tensor self, Tensor other) -> (Tensor) 
Jul 01 04:42:50 	aten::pin_memory(Tensor self) -> (Tensor) 
Jul 01 04:42:50 	aten::reshape(Tensor self, int[] shape) -> (Tensor) 
Jul 01 04:42:50 	aten::detach(Tensor self) -> (Tensor) 
Jul 01 04:42:50 	aten::expand_as(Tensor self, Tensor other) -> (Tensor) 
Jul 01 04:42:50 	aten::flatten.DimnameList(Tensor self, str[] dims, str out_dim) -> (Tensor) 
Jul 01 04:42:50 	aten::flatten.named_out_dim(Tensor self, int start_dim, int end_dim, str out_dim) -> (Tensor)
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Follow this link to opt-out of these comments for your Pull Requests.

Please report bugs/suggestions on the GitHub issue tracker or post in the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.

See how this bot performed.

This comment has been revised 45 times.

facebook-github-bot
facebook-github-bot reviewed Jun 29, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@AshkanAliabadi has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

facebook-github-bot
facebook-github-bot reviewed Jun 30, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@AshkanAliabadi has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

facebook-github-bot
facebook-github-bot reviewed Jul 1, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@AshkanAliabadi has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@AshkanAliabadi AshkanAliabadi mentioned this pull request Jul 9, 2020
Merged
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@AshkanAliabadi merged this pull request in c8deca8.

malfet pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2020
Update pthreadpool to pthreadpool:029c88620802e1361ccf41d1970bd5b07fd…
cefb9e0 
…6b7bb. (#40524) (#41190)

Summary: Pull Request resolved: #40524

Reviewed By: ezyang

Differential Revision: D22215742

Pulled By: AshkanAliabadi

fbshipit-source-id: ef594e0901337a92b21ddd44e554da66c723eb7c
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot left review comments

@dreiss dreiss dreiss approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Merged
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@AshkanAliabadi @facebook-github-bot @dreiss @mruberry