fix(parser): support negative number literals - #195
Merged
brunomendola merged 1 commit intoJul 13, 2026
Merged
Conversation
INT_VALUE and DECIMAL_VALUE only matched unsigned numbers, so a query like `price = -10` produced a token recognition error on '-' and ANTLR's error recovery silently dropped the sign, parsing the value as +10. Negative literals are now accepted wherever a number literal is valid: condition values, IN arrays and function arguments. Integer.parseInt and new BigDecimal already handle the leading minus, so no visitor changes are needed.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
INT_VALUE and DECIMAL_VALUE only matched unsigned numbers, so a query like
price = -10produced a token recognition error on '-' and ANTLR's error recovery silently dropped the sign, parsing the value as +10. Negative literals are now accepted wherever a number literal is valid: condition values, IN arrays and function arguments.Integer.parseInt and new BigDecimal already handle the leading minus, so no visitor changes are needed.