Add note about checking Debug Probe firmware version #4171
Conversation
|
Would it be worth saying 2.x.y is shown as 2.xy in the lsusb output to avoid potential confusion? |
Thanks, done 👍 |
documentation/asciidoc/microcontrollers/debug-probe/updating-firmware.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
documentation/asciidoc/microcontrollers/debug-probe/updating-firmware.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
documentation/asciidoc/microcontrollers/debug-probe/updating-firmware.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
|
||
| [NOTE] | ||
| -- | ||
| The `Info : CMSIS-DAP: FW Version = 2.0.0` line reported by `openocd` only refers to the CMSIS-DAP protocol level (which is different to the Debug Probe firmware version). To check the firmware version of your Debug Probe, run: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| The `Info : CMSIS-DAP: FW Version = 2.0.0` line reported by `openocd` only refers to the CMSIS-DAP protocol level (which is different to the Debug Probe firmware version). To check the firmware version of your Debug Probe, run: | |
| The `Info : CMSIS-DAP: FW Version = 2.0.0` line reported by `openocd` only refers to the `CMSIS-DAP` protocol level (which is different to the Debug Probe firmware version). To check the firmware version of your Debug Probe, run: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm not sure that CMSIS-DAP needs to be put in backticks? https://arm-software.github.io/CMSIS_5/DAP/html/index.html just uses it as a regular word.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Backticks are typically added for literal identifiers (like a protocol name or configuration option) that might appear in code or logs. I put it in backticks because it's the name of a protocol, but you could also make the argument that you're describing the protocol more generally if you really want to remove the backticks.
…irmware.adoc Co-authored-by: Jeunese <[email protected]>
ping @P33M