Test URLs

IDK what to put here,

Where did you take the screenshot? That URL.

There are also a number of test URLs at the bottom of the feature's source code. I'd like to see what it looks like on those, particularly on https://github.com/refined-github/sandbox/pull/91/commits. Check the entire list, especially at the bottom.

There are also a number of test URLs at the bottom of the feature's source code. I'd like to see what it looks like on those, particularly on refined-github/sandbox#91 (commits). Check the entire list, especially at the bottom.

🤡 <- me

Where did you take the screenshot? That URL.

It's a private company repo, gonna use the urls in the bottom of the file and gonna create a dummy repo

As of this comment the only difference is the fix(for `key`): no backticks
Before:

After:

Apart from the duplication, I guess should avoid adding the label when the scope has backticks

Boi, GH sure do some shenanigans with their markup, i tried to have both code and PR links inside the scope if present, but then settled for the fix.
I would really have liked some easily parsable data from github, like a json besides the markup to avoid parse the entire DOM of a commit, but that's asking too much i guess.

PR updated with my test URL and control screens of the already present test URLs.

Yeah that's why the code was written this way, I don't want the feature to support/break the formatting. If the scope contains formatted code, then it's "invalid" according to the spec we're following.

I've updated both the commit and the PR description to adhere to our spec, with example screenshots too