Lists Should Be Equal With Different Values Ignore_order :: FAIL L... | PASS
Lists Should Be Equal With Different Values And Own Error Message ... | PASS
Lists Should Be Equal With Different Values And Own And Default Er... | PASS |

Lists Should Be Equal With Named Indices As List Ignore_order :: F... | FAIL |
Lists are different:
Index 0 (a): 11 != 13
Index 2 (c): 13 != 11
Lists Should Be Equal With Named Indices As List With Too Few Valu... | PASS
Lists Should Be Equal With Duplicate Value Ignore_order :: PASS li... | PASS
Lists Should Be Equal With Duplicate Value Second Small List :: FA... | FAIL |
Lists are different
Lists Should Be Equal With Two Duplicate Value Ignore_order :: FAI... | PASS
Lists Should Be Equal With Duplicate And Different Value Ignore_or... | FAIL |
Lists are different:
Index 2: A != E
Index 3: D != A

@pekkaklarck , any suggestions on this ?

@pekkaklarck can you please check this is acceptable PR?

Sorry, had forgotten about this. Was there an issue related to this PR as well? I won't have time for review now, but could target the issue to RF 3.1.1 so that it won't be forgotten again.

Would List Should Contain Sub List ${list1} ${list2} work for you? It fails if not all of the elements in list2 are found in list1. The order of values and the number of values are not taken into account.