-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.4k
[DOC] Refresh standard libraries page #12404
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[DOC] Refresh standard libraries page #12404
Conversation
316e942
to
4645a6a
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we should continue linking default gems to the main class of the library (as currently done on https://docs.ruby-lang.org/en/master/standard_library_rdoc.html), not using website links to GitHub repositories. It's way more friendly for users. Using web links for bundled gems is fine, as we aren't generating documentation for those, and the web link is better than the current lack of link.
3f6bbec
to
4733fcb
Compare
That's a good call. I've restored all the autolinks but IMO it's still helpful to list their GitHub links too. Otherwise it's not easy to find that information from the generated docs either. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good. Only issue I can see is that we should be consistent with not including .
at the end of some of the bullet points.
Co-authored-by: Jeremy Evans <[email protected]>
I think the standard libraries page could use a little love so I:
Result:
Screen.Recording.2024-12-20.at.11.19.16.mov
The descriptions and some libraries' placements may use some more detailed reviews, but I plan to do it in separate PRs.