Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Clarify numeric literal terminology in data types section #4339

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

SadiqOnGithub
Copy link

This PR enhances clarity in the "Integer Literals" documentation section by:

  1. Acknowledging the intentional shift from "integer literals" to "number literals"

  2. Explicitly connecting numeric literal features to floating-point literals

  3. Maintaining table accuracy while explaining broader applicability

The changes help readers understand that type suffixes and visual separators apply to all numeric literals, while keeping the section focused on integer examples.

This PR enhances clarity in the "Integer Literals" documentation section by:

1. Acknowledging the intentional shift from "integer literals" to "number literals"

2. Explicitly connecting numeric literal features to floating-point literals

3. Maintaining table accuracy while explaining broader applicability

The changes help readers understand that type suffixes and visual separators apply to all numeric literals, while keeping the section focused on integer examples.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant