Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@compiler-errors compiler-errors commented Sep 1, 2023

@QuineDot makes a good point in #115010 (comment) that we probably should not accept more code due to #115011 even though that code will eventually become a forbid-warning in a few versions (#115010 (comment)).

Fall through when walking thru the AnonymousWarnToStatic (renamed to AnonymousWarn) rib so that we can resolve as a fresh lifetime like we did before.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Sep 1, 2023

r? @TaKO8Ki

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Sep 1, 2023
@cjgillot
Copy link
Contributor

cjgillot commented Sep 1, 2023

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 1, 2023

📌 Commit b62eeb2 has been approved by cjgillot

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 1, 2023
fmease added a commit to fmease/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2023
…rough, r=cjgillot

Fall through when resolving elided assoc const lifetimes

`@QuineDot` makes a good point in rust-lang#115010 (comment) that we probably should not accept *more* code due to rust-lang#115011 even though that code will eventually become a forbid-warning in a few versions (rust-lang#115010 (comment)).

Fall through when walking thru the `AnonymousWarnToStatic` (renamed to `AnonymousWarn`) rib so that we can resolve as a fresh lifetime like we did before.
fmease added a commit to fmease/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2023
…rough, r=cjgillot

Fall through when resolving elided assoc const lifetimes

``@QuineDot`` makes a good point in rust-lang#115010 (comment) that we probably should not accept *more* code due to rust-lang#115011 even though that code will eventually become a forbid-warning in a few versions (rust-lang#115010 (comment)).

Fall through when walking thru the `AnonymousWarnToStatic` (renamed to `AnonymousWarn`) rib so that we can resolve as a fresh lifetime like we did before.
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 2, 2023

⌛ Testing commit b62eeb2 with merge 9229b1e...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 2, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: cjgillot
Pushing 9229b1e to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Sep 2, 2023
@bors bors merged commit 9229b1e into rust-lang:master Sep 2, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.74.0 milestone Sep 2, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (9229b1e): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-1.0% [-1.5%, -0.6%] 7
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -1.0% [-1.5%, -0.6%] 7

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
3.9% [3.9%, 3.9%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-1.0% [-1.8%, -0.5%] 4
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-1.1% [-1.1%, -1.1%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) -1.0% [-1.8%, -0.5%] 4

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-4.1% [-5.1%, -3.1%] 3
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -4.1% [-5.1%, -3.1%] 3

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 630.176s -> 629.877s (-0.05%)
Artifact size: 316.58 MiB -> 316.63 MiB (0.02%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants