match clang's `va_arg` assembly on arm targets #144549

folkertdev · 2025-07-27T21:44:44Z

tracking issue: #44930

For this example

#![feature(c_variadic)]

#[unsafe(no_mangle)]
unsafe extern "C" fn variadic(a: f64, mut args: ...) -> f64 {
    let b = args.arg::<f64>();
    let c = args.arg::<f64>();

    a + b + c
}

We currently generate (via llvm):

variadic:
    sub     sp, sp, #12
    stmib   sp, {r2, r3}
    vmov    d0, r0, r1
    add     r0, sp, #4
    vldr    d1, [sp, #4]
    add     r0, r0, #15
    bic     r0, r0, #7
    vadd.f64        d0, d0, d1
    add     r1, r0, #8
    str     r1, [sp]
    vldr    d1, [r0]
    vadd.f64        d0, d0, d1
    vmov    r0, r1, d0
    add     sp, sp, #12
    bx      lr

LLVM is not doing a good job. In fact, it's well-known that LLVM's implementation of va_arg is kind of bad, and we implement it ourselves (based on clang) for many targets already. For arm, our own emit_ptr_va_arg saves 3 instructions.

Next, it turns out it's important for LLVM to explicitly start and end the lifetime of the va_list. In #146059 I already end the lifetime, but when looking at this again, I noticed that it is important to also start it, see https://godbolt.org/z/EGqvKTTsK: failing to explicitly start the lifetime uses an extra register.

So, the combination of emit_ptr_va_arg with starting/ending the lifetime makes rustc emit exactly the instructions that clang generates::

variadic:
    sub     sp, sp, #12
    stmib   sp, {r2, r3}
    vmov    d16, r0, r1
    vldr    d17, [sp, #4]
    vadd.f64        d16, d16, d17
    vldr    d17, [sp, #12]
    vadd.f64        d16, d16, d17
    vmov    r0, r1, d16
    add     sp, sp, #12
    bx      lr

The arguments to emit_ptr_va_arg are based on the clang implementation.

r? @workingjubilee (I can re-roll if your queue is too full, but you do seem like the right person here)

try-job: armhf-gnu

rustbot · 2025-07-27T21:44:48Z

workingjubilee is currently at their maximum review capacity.
They may take a while to respond.

rustbot · 2025-07-27T21:44:50Z

Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa

cc @WaffleLapkin

…-multiple-abis-arm, r=RalfJung,davidtwco c-variadic: multiple ABIs in the same program for arm similar to rust-lang#144379, but for arm, requested in rust-lang#144066. Quoting rust-lang/reference#1946 (comment) > `"aapcs"` specifically refers to the soft-float ABI where floating-point values are passed in integer registers. However for c-variadic functions, `aapcs` behaves the same as `C`: https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/blob/main/aapcs32/aapcs32.rst#65parameter-passing > A variadic function is always marshaled as for the base standard. https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/blob/main/aapcs32/aapcs32.rst#7the-standard-variants > This section applies only to non-variadic functions. For a variadic function the base standard is always used both for argument passing and result return. --- I also noticed that rustc currently emit more instructions than clang for c-variadic functions on arm, see https://godbolt.org/z/hMce9rnTh. I'll fix that separately. (edit: rust-lang#144549) try-job: armhf-gnu r? `@RalfJung`

Rollup merge of #144541 - folkertdev:c-variadic-same-program-multiple-abis-arm, r=RalfJung,davidtwco c-variadic: multiple ABIs in the same program for arm similar to #144379, but for arm, requested in #144066. Quoting rust-lang/reference#1946 (comment) > `"aapcs"` specifically refers to the soft-float ABI where floating-point values are passed in integer registers. However for c-variadic functions, `aapcs` behaves the same as `C`: https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/blob/main/aapcs32/aapcs32.rst#65parameter-passing > A variadic function is always marshaled as for the base standard. https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/blob/main/aapcs32/aapcs32.rst#7the-standard-variants > This section applies only to non-variadic functions. For a variadic function the base standard is always used both for argument passing and result return. --- I also noticed that rustc currently emit more instructions than clang for c-variadic functions on arm, see https://godbolt.org/z/hMce9rnTh. I'll fix that separately. (edit: #144549) try-job: armhf-gnu r? `@RalfJung`

…-abis-arm, r=RalfJung,davidtwco c-variadic: multiple ABIs in the same program for arm similar to rust-lang/rust#144379, but for arm, requested in rust-lang/rust#144066. Quoting rust-lang/reference#1946 (comment) > `"aapcs"` specifically refers to the soft-float ABI where floating-point values are passed in integer registers. However for c-variadic functions, `aapcs` behaves the same as `C`: https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/blob/main/aapcs32/aapcs32.rst#65parameter-passing > A variadic function is always marshaled as for the base standard. https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/blob/main/aapcs32/aapcs32.rst#7the-standard-variants > This section applies only to non-variadic functions. For a variadic function the base standard is always used both for argument passing and result return. --- I also noticed that rustc currently emit more instructions than clang for c-variadic functions on arm, see https://godbolt.org/z/hMce9rnTh. I'll fix that separately. (edit: rust-lang/rust#144549) try-job: armhf-gnu r? `@RalfJung`

explicitly end the lifetime of `va_list` tracking issue: #44930 split out from: #144549 The `va_list` is created in the compiler itself when the variable argument list `...` is desugared, and hence the lifetime end is not inserted automatically. The value can't outlive the function in which it was created, so it is correct to end the lifetime here. Ending the lifetime explicitly also appears to give slightly better codegen in #144549. I also included a little drive-by improvement to not cast pointers to integers and back again. r? codegen

folkertdev · 2025-09-02T22:22:26Z

Jubilee is busy, so

r? codegen

explicitly end the lifetime of `va_list` tracking issue: rust-lang/rust#44930 split out from: rust-lang/rust#144549 The `va_list` is created in the compiler itself when the variable argument list `...` is desugared, and hence the lifetime end is not inserted automatically. The value can't outlive the function in which it was created, so it is correct to end the lifetime here. Ending the lifetime explicitly also appears to give slightly better codegen in rust-lang/rust#144549. I also included a little drive-by improvement to not cast pointers to integers and back again. r? codegen

saethlin · 2025-09-08T02:46:22Z

I appreciate your thorough PR description. Thanks ❤️

@bors r+

bors · 2025-09-08T02:46:25Z

📌 Commit fa9e1f9 has been approved by saethlin

It is now in the queue for this repository.

match clang's `va_arg` assembly on arm targets tracking issue: rust-lang#44930 For this example ```rust #![feature(c_variadic)] #[unsafe(no_mangle)] unsafe extern "C" fn variadic(a: f64, mut args: ...) -> f64 { let b = args.arg::<f64>(); let c = args.arg::<f64>(); a + b + c } ``` We currently generate (via llvm): ```asm variadic: sub sp, sp, rust-lang#12 stmib sp, {r2, r3} vmov d0, r0, r1 add r0, sp, rust-lang#4 vldr d1, [sp, rust-lang#4] add r0, r0, rust-lang#15 bic r0, r0, rust-lang#7 vadd.f64 d0, d0, d1 add r1, r0, rust-lang#8 str r1, [sp] vldr d1, [r0] vadd.f64 d0, d0, d1 vmov r0, r1, d0 add sp, sp, rust-lang#12 bx lr ``` LLVM is not doing a good job. In fact, it's well-known that LLVM's implementation of `va_arg` is kind of bad, and we implement it ourselves (based on clang) for many targets already. For arm, our own `emit_ptr_va_arg` saves 3 instructions. Next, it turns out it's important for LLVM to explicitly start and end the lifetime of the `va_list`. In rust-lang#146059 I already end the lifetime, but when looking at this again, I noticed that it is important to also start it, see https://godbolt.org/z/EGqvKTTsK: failing to explicitly start the lifetime uses an extra register. So, the combination of `emit_ptr_va_arg` with starting/ending the lifetime makes rustc emit exactly the instructions that clang generates:: ```asm variadic: sub sp, sp, rust-lang#12 stmib sp, {r2, r3} vmov d16, r0, r1 vldr d17, [sp, rust-lang#4] vadd.f64 d16, d16, d17 vldr d17, [sp, rust-lang#12] vadd.f64 d16, d16, d17 vmov r0, r1, d16 add sp, sp, rust-lang#12 bx lr ``` The arguments to `emit_ptr_va_arg` are based on [the clang implementation](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/03dc2a41f3d9a500e47b513de5c5008c06860d65/clang/lib/CodeGen/Targets/ARM.cpp#L798-L844). r? `@workingjubilee` (I can re-roll if your queue is too full, but you do seem like the right person here)

match clang's `va_arg` assembly on arm targets try-job: arm-android try-job: armhf-gnu

rust-bors · 2025-09-08T13:51:29Z

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: c3920c0 (c3920c014ad1d112e73c7b175abe2fc91c026ac1, parent: beeb8e3af54295ba494c250e84ecda4c2c5d85ff)

folkertdev · 2025-09-08T14:00:27Z

@rustbot ready

Android uses different instructions (it looks like it's softfloat?), so it gets ignored now.

It is technically possible to make this a minicore test, but it would leak a bunch of implementation details, so I'm not sure that's better. Here is what that would look like:

//@ add-core-stubs
//@ assembly-output: emit-asm
//@ compile-flags: -Copt-level=3
//@ only-arm
//@ ignore-android
//@ ignore-thumb
#![feature(no_core, lang_items, intrinsics)]
#![no_core]
#![crate_type = "lib"]
#![feature(c_variadic)]

extern crate minicore;
use minicore::*;

#[lang = "va_list"]
struct VaList<'a> {
    ptr: *mut u8,
    _marker: PhantomData<&'a u8>,
}

impl VaList<'_> {
    unsafe fn arg<T: VaArgSafe>(&mut self) -> T {
        va_arg(self)
    }
}

trait VaArgSafe {}

impl VaArgSafe for f64 {}

#[rustc_intrinsic]
pub unsafe fn va_arg<T: VaArgSafe>(ap: &mut VaList<'_>) -> T;

#[rustc_intrinsic]
pub const fn fadd_algebraic<T: Copy>(x: T, y: T) -> T;

// Check that the assembly that rustc generates matches what clang emits.

#[unsafe(no_mangle)]
unsafe extern "C" fn variadic(a: f64, mut args: ...) -> f64 {
    // CHECK-LABEL: variadic
    // CHECK: sub sp, sp

    // CHECK: vldr
    // CHECK: vadd.f64
    // CHECK: vldr
    // CHECK: vadd.f64
    let b = args.arg::<f64>();
    let c = args.arg::<f64>();
    fadd_algebraic(fadd_algebraic(a, b), c)

    // CHECK: add sp, sp
}

saethlin · 2025-09-10T00:17:21Z

Can't this test use integers instead? That should work fine on softfloat targets.

folkertdev · 2025-09-10T11:42:11Z

Using integers doesn't really help, android must be using some older arm version than even arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi, or otherwise restrict instruction selection. In any case, just testing for standard arm should be sufficient, it tests that we emit the right thing there, and the implementation is otherwise equivalent to the one in clang, so it's a reasonable assumption that we'll generate good code for android and thumb as well.

https://godbolt.org/z/v6bsdGssq

sum_two:
        sub     sp, sp, #16
        stmib   sp, {r1, r2, r3}
        add     r0, sp, #4
        ldr     r2, [r0, #4]!
        add     r0, r2, r1
        add     sp, sp, #16
        bx      lr

versus

sum_two:
        sub     sp, sp, #12
        push    {r11, lr}
        mov     r11, sp
        sub     sp, sp, #4
        add     r0, r11, #8
        stm     r0, {r1, r2, r3}
        add     r0, r11, #8
        ldr     r2, [r0, #4]!
        add     r0, r2, r1
        mov     sp, r11
        pop     {r11, lr}
        add     sp, sp, #12
        bx      lr

saethlin · 2025-09-12T00:43:44Z

@bors r+ rollup=iffy

bors · 2025-09-12T00:43:46Z

📌 Commit 94fbb21 has been approved by saethlin

It is now in the queue for this repository.

bors · 2025-09-12T01:35:36Z

⌛ Testing commit 94fbb21 with merge 967830a...

match clang's `va_arg` assembly on arm targets tracking issue: #44930 For this example ```rust #![feature(c_variadic)] #[unsafe(no_mangle)] unsafe extern "C" fn variadic(a: f64, mut args: ...) -> f64 { let b = args.arg::<f64>(); let c = args.arg::<f64>(); a + b + c } ``` We currently generate (via llvm): ```asm variadic: sub sp, sp, #12 stmib sp, {r2, r3} vmov d0, r0, r1 add r0, sp, #4 vldr d1, [sp, #4] add r0, r0, #15 bic r0, r0, #7 vadd.f64 d0, d0, d1 add r1, r0, #8 str r1, [sp] vldr d1, [r0] vadd.f64 d0, d0, d1 vmov r0, r1, d0 add sp, sp, #12 bx lr ``` LLVM is not doing a good job. In fact, it's well-known that LLVM's implementation of `va_arg` is kind of bad, and we implement it ourselves (based on clang) for many targets already. For arm, our own `emit_ptr_va_arg` saves 3 instructions. Next, it turns out it's important for LLVM to explicitly start and end the lifetime of the `va_list`. In #146059 I already end the lifetime, but when looking at this again, I noticed that it is important to also start it, see https://godbolt.org/z/EGqvKTTsK: failing to explicitly start the lifetime uses an extra register. So, the combination of `emit_ptr_va_arg` with starting/ending the lifetime makes rustc emit exactly the instructions that clang generates:: ```asm variadic: sub sp, sp, #12 stmib sp, {r2, r3} vmov d16, r0, r1 vldr d17, [sp, #4] vadd.f64 d16, d16, d17 vldr d17, [sp, #12] vadd.f64 d16, d16, d17 vmov r0, r1, d16 add sp, sp, #12 bx lr ``` The arguments to `emit_ptr_va_arg` are based on [the clang implementation](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/03dc2a41f3d9a500e47b513de5c5008c06860d65/clang/lib/CodeGen/Targets/ARM.cpp#L798-L844). r? `@workingjubilee` (I can re-roll if your queue is too full, but you do seem like the right person here) try-job: armhf-gnu

bors · 2025-09-12T01:44:08Z

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

rust-log-analyzer · 2025-09-12T01:45:08Z

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain enhanced) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

    Updating crates.io index
warning: spurious network error (3 tries remaining): [28] Timeout was reached (Operation too slow. Less than 10 bytes/sec transferred the last 30 seconds)
warning: spurious network error (3 tries remaining): [28] Timeout was reached (Operation too slow. Less than 10 bytes/sec transferred the last 30 seconds)
warning: spurious network error (2 tries remaining): [28] Timeout was reached (Operation too slow. Less than 10 bytes/sec transferred the last 30 seconds)
warning: spurious network error (1 try remaining): [28] Timeout was reached (Operation too slow. Less than 10 bytes/sec transferred the last 30 seconds)
error: failed to get `askama_parser` as a dependency of package `askama_derive v0.14.0`
    ... which satisfies dependency `askama_derive = "=0.14.0"` (locked to 0.14.0) of package `askama v0.14.0`
    ... which satisfies dependency `askama = "^0.14"` (locked to 0.14.0) of package `citool v0.1.0 (D:\a\rust\rust\src\ci\citool)`

Caused by:
  download of as/ka/askama_parser failed

Caused by:
  failed to download from `https://index.crates.io/as/ka/askama_parser`

Caused by:
  [28] Timeout was reached (Operation too slow. Less than 10 bytes/sec transferred the last 30 seconds)
##[error]Process completed with exit code 101.
Post job cleanup.

saethlin · 2025-09-12T02:52:52Z

@bors retry

match clang's `va_arg` assembly on arm targets tracking issue: rust-lang#44930 For this example ```rust #![feature(c_variadic)] #[unsafe(no_mangle)] unsafe extern "C" fn variadic(a: f64, mut args: ...) -> f64 { let b = args.arg::<f64>(); let c = args.arg::<f64>(); a + b + c } ``` We currently generate (via llvm): ```asm variadic: sub sp, sp, rust-lang#12 stmib sp, {r2, r3} vmov d0, r0, r1 add r0, sp, rust-lang#4 vldr d1, [sp, rust-lang#4] add r0, r0, rust-lang#15 bic r0, r0, rust-lang#7 vadd.f64 d0, d0, d1 add r1, r0, rust-lang#8 str r1, [sp] vldr d1, [r0] vadd.f64 d0, d0, d1 vmov r0, r1, d0 add sp, sp, rust-lang#12 bx lr ``` LLVM is not doing a good job. In fact, it's well-known that LLVM's implementation of `va_arg` is kind of bad, and we implement it ourselves (based on clang) for many targets already. For arm, our own `emit_ptr_va_arg` saves 3 instructions. Next, it turns out it's important for LLVM to explicitly start and end the lifetime of the `va_list`. In rust-lang#146059 I already end the lifetime, but when looking at this again, I noticed that it is important to also start it, see https://godbolt.org/z/EGqvKTTsK: failing to explicitly start the lifetime uses an extra register. So, the combination of `emit_ptr_va_arg` with starting/ending the lifetime makes rustc emit exactly the instructions that clang generates:: ```asm variadic: sub sp, sp, rust-lang#12 stmib sp, {r2, r3} vmov d16, r0, r1 vldr d17, [sp, rust-lang#4] vadd.f64 d16, d16, d17 vldr d17, [sp, rust-lang#12] vadd.f64 d16, d16, d17 vmov r0, r1, d16 add sp, sp, rust-lang#12 bx lr ``` The arguments to `emit_ptr_va_arg` are based on [the clang implementation](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/03dc2a41f3d9a500e47b513de5c5008c06860d65/clang/lib/CodeGen/Targets/ARM.cpp#L798-L844). r? `@workingjubilee` (I can re-roll if your queue is too full, but you do seem like the right person here) try-job: armhf-gnu

Rollup of 16 pull requests Successful merges: - #144549 (match clang's `va_arg` assembly on arm targets) - #145660 (initial implementation of the darwin_objc unstable feature) - #145895 (thread parking: fix docs and examples) - #146308 (support integer literals in `${concat()}`) - #146323 (check before test for hardware capabilites in bits 32~63 of usize) - #146332 (tidy: make behavior of extra-checks more uniform) - #146374 (Update `browser-ui-test` version to `0.22.2`) - #146413 (Improve suggestion in case a bare URL is surrounded by brackets) - #146426 (Bump miow to 0.60.1) - #146432 (Implement `Socket::take_error` for Hermit) - #146433 (rwlock tests: fix miri macos test regression) - #146435 (Change the default value of `gcc.download-ci-gcc` to `true`) - #146439 (fix cfg for poison test macro) - #146448 ([rustdoc] Correctly handle literal search on paths) - #146449 (Fix `libgccjit` symlink when we build GCC locally) - #146455 (test: remove an outdated normalization for rustc versions) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup

Rollup of 15 pull requests Successful merges: - #144549 (match clang's `va_arg` assembly on arm targets) - #145895 (thread parking: fix docs and examples) - #146308 (support integer literals in `${concat()}`) - #146323 (check before test for hardware capabilites in bits 32~63 of usize) - #146332 (tidy: make behavior of extra-checks more uniform) - #146374 (Update `browser-ui-test` version to `0.22.2`) - #146413 (Improve suggestion in case a bare URL is surrounded by brackets) - #146426 (Bump miow to 0.60.1) - #146432 (Implement `Socket::take_error` for Hermit) - #146433 (rwlock tests: fix miri macos test regression) - #146435 (Change the default value of `gcc.download-ci-gcc` to `true`) - #146439 (fix cfg for poison test macro) - #146448 ([rustdoc] Correctly handle literal search on paths) - #146449 (Fix `libgccjit` symlink when we build GCC locally) - #146455 (test: remove an outdated normalization for rustc versions) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup

Rollup merge of #144549 - folkertdev:va-arg-arm, r=saethlin match clang's `va_arg` assembly on arm targets tracking issue: #44930 For this example ```rust #![feature(c_variadic)] #[unsafe(no_mangle)] unsafe extern "C" fn variadic(a: f64, mut args: ...) -> f64 { let b = args.arg::<f64>(); let c = args.arg::<f64>(); a + b + c } ``` We currently generate (via llvm): ```asm variadic: sub sp, sp, #12 stmib sp, {r2, r3} vmov d0, r0, r1 add r0, sp, #4 vldr d1, [sp, #4] add r0, r0, #15 bic r0, r0, #7 vadd.f64 d0, d0, d1 add r1, r0, #8 str r1, [sp] vldr d1, [r0] vadd.f64 d0, d0, d1 vmov r0, r1, d0 add sp, sp, #12 bx lr ``` LLVM is not doing a good job. In fact, it's well-known that LLVM's implementation of `va_arg` is kind of bad, and we implement it ourselves (based on clang) for many targets already. For arm, our own `emit_ptr_va_arg` saves 3 instructions. Next, it turns out it's important for LLVM to explicitly start and end the lifetime of the `va_list`. In #146059 I already end the lifetime, but when looking at this again, I noticed that it is important to also start it, see https://godbolt.org/z/EGqvKTTsK: failing to explicitly start the lifetime uses an extra register. So, the combination of `emit_ptr_va_arg` with starting/ending the lifetime makes rustc emit exactly the instructions that clang generates:: ```asm variadic: sub sp, sp, #12 stmib sp, {r2, r3} vmov d16, r0, r1 vldr d17, [sp, #4] vadd.f64 d16, d16, d17 vldr d17, [sp, #12] vadd.f64 d16, d16, d17 vmov r0, r1, d16 add sp, sp, #12 bx lr ``` The arguments to `emit_ptr_va_arg` are based on [the clang implementation](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/03dc2a41f3d9a500e47b513de5c5008c06860d65/clang/lib/CodeGen/Targets/ARM.cpp#L798-L844). r? ``@workingjubilee`` (I can re-roll if your queue is too full, but you do seem like the right person here) try-job: armhf-gnu

Rollup of 15 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang/rust#144549 (match clang's `va_arg` assembly on arm targets) - rust-lang/rust#145895 (thread parking: fix docs and examples) - rust-lang/rust#146308 (support integer literals in `${concat()}`) - rust-lang/rust#146323 (check before test for hardware capabilites in bits 32~63 of usize) - rust-lang/rust#146332 (tidy: make behavior of extra-checks more uniform) - rust-lang/rust#146374 (Update `browser-ui-test` version to `0.22.2`) - rust-lang/rust#146413 (Improve suggestion in case a bare URL is surrounded by brackets) - rust-lang/rust#146426 (Bump miow to 0.60.1) - rust-lang/rust#146432 (Implement `Socket::take_error` for Hermit) - rust-lang/rust#146433 (rwlock tests: fix miri macos test regression) - rust-lang/rust#146435 (Change the default value of `gcc.download-ci-gcc` to `true`) - rust-lang/rust#146439 (fix cfg for poison test macro) - rust-lang/rust#146448 ([rustdoc] Correctly handle literal search on paths) - rust-lang/rust#146449 (Fix `libgccjit` symlink when we build GCC locally) - rust-lang/rust#146455 (test: remove an outdated normalization for rustc versions) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup

rustbot assigned workingjubilee Jul 27, 2025

folkertdev added the F-c_variadic `#![feature(c_variadic)]` label Jul 27, 2025

folkertdev mentioned this pull request Aug 2, 2025

c-variadic: multiple ABIs in the same program for arm #144541

Merged

folkertdev mentioned this pull request Aug 31, 2025

explicitly end the lifetime of va_list #146059

Merged

folkertdev force-pushed the va-arg-arm branch from e64dda6 to b37bd2a Compare September 2, 2025 07:55

folkertdev changed the title ~~improve va_arg assembly on arm targets~~ match clang's va_arg assembly on arm targets Sep 2, 2025

folkertdev force-pushed the va-arg-arm branch 2 times, most recently from fc1a674 to fc58e08 Compare September 2, 2025 22:16

explicitly start va_list lifetime

4189005

folkertdev force-pushed the va-arg-arm branch from fc58e08 to fa9e1f9 Compare September 2, 2025 22:19

rustbot assigned saethlin and unassigned workingjubilee Sep 2, 2025

bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 8, 2025

matthiaskrgr mentioned this pull request Sep 8, 2025

Rollup of 5 pull requests #146318

Closed

rust-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2025

Auto merge of #144549 - folkertdev:va-arg-arm, r=<try>

c3920c0

match clang's `va_arg` assembly on arm targets try-job: arm-android try-job: armhf-gnu

rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Sep 8, 2025

bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 12, 2025

bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Sep 12, 2025

bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 12, 2025

Zalathar mentioned this pull request Sep 12, 2025

Rollup of 16 pull requests #146462

Closed

Zalathar mentioned this pull request Sep 12, 2025

Rollup of 15 pull requests #146468

Merged

bors merged commit 48d6841 into rust-lang:master Sep 12, 2025
11 of 12 checks passed

rustbot added this to the 1.91.0 milestone Sep 12, 2025

folkertdev mentioned this pull request Sep 15, 2025

tests/codegen-llvm: Make size argument to llvm.lifetime.{start,end} optional in c-variadic-lifetime test #146583

Closed

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

match clang's `va_arg` assembly on arm targets #144549

match clang's `va_arg` assembly on arm targets #144549

folkertdev commented Jul 27, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

rustbot commented Jul 27, 2025

Uh oh!

rustbot commented Jul 27, 2025

Uh oh!

folkertdev commented Sep 2, 2025

Uh oh!

saethlin commented Sep 8, 2025

Uh oh!

bors commented Sep 8, 2025

Uh oh!

rust-bors bot commented Sep 8, 2025

Uh oh!

folkertdev commented Sep 8, 2025

Uh oh!

saethlin commented Sep 10, 2025

Uh oh!

folkertdev commented Sep 10, 2025

Uh oh!

saethlin commented Sep 12, 2025

Uh oh!

bors commented Sep 12, 2025

Uh oh!

bors commented Sep 12, 2025

Uh oh!

bors commented Sep 12, 2025

Uh oh!

rust-log-analyzer commented Sep 12, 2025

Uh oh!

saethlin commented Sep 12, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

match clang's va_arg assembly on arm targets #144549

match clang's va_arg assembly on arm targets #144549

Conversation

folkertdev commented Jul 27, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

rustbot commented Jul 27, 2025

Uh oh!

rustbot commented Jul 27, 2025

Uh oh!

folkertdev commented Sep 2, 2025

Uh oh!

saethlin commented Sep 8, 2025

Uh oh!

bors commented Sep 8, 2025

Uh oh!

rust-bors bot commented Sep 8, 2025

Uh oh!

folkertdev commented Sep 8, 2025

Uh oh!

saethlin commented Sep 10, 2025

Uh oh!

folkertdev commented Sep 10, 2025

Uh oh!

saethlin commented Sep 12, 2025

Uh oh!

bors commented Sep 12, 2025

Uh oh!

bors commented Sep 12, 2025

Uh oh!

bors commented Sep 12, 2025

Uh oh!

rust-log-analyzer commented Sep 12, 2025

Uh oh!

saethlin commented Sep 12, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

match clang's `va_arg` assembly on arm targets #144549

match clang's `va_arg` assembly on arm targets #144549

folkertdev commented Jul 27, 2025 •

edited

Loading