Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

LorrensP-2158466
Copy link
Contributor

Adds APPROX_DELTA to 2 tests of f32::log reported in #miri > Miri test-libstd Failure (2025-08).

I changed 2 lines, the first one is the actual failure. The second one is precautionary.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Aug 31, 2025

r? @ibraheemdev

rustbot has assigned @ibraheemdev.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Aug 31, 2025
@LorrensP-2158466
Copy link
Contributor Author

r? @RalfJung

@rustbot rustbot assigned RalfJung and unassigned ibraheemdev Aug 31, 2025
assert_approx_eq!(10.0f32.log(10.0), 1.0);
assert_approx_eq!(2.3f32.log(3.5), 0.664858);
assert_approx_eq!(10.0f32.log(10.0), 1.0, APPROX_DELTA);
assert_approx_eq!(2.3f32.log(3.5), 0.664858, APPROX_DELTA);
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If 10.log(10) fails, then this one will fail eventually, so I used APPROX_DELTA here as well.

@RalfJung
Copy link
Member

Thanks!
@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 31, 2025

📌 Commit cfba491 has been approved by RalfJung

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 31, 2025
jhpratt added a commit to jhpratt/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 31, 2025
…r=RalfJung

Change std f32 test to pass under Miri

Adds `APPROX_DELTA` to 2 tests of `f32::log` reported in [#miri > Miri test-libstd Failure (2025-08)](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/269128-miri/topic/Miri.20test-libstd.20Failure.20.282025-08.29).

I changed 2 lines, the first one is the actual failure. The second one is precautionary.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 31, 2025
Rollup of 3 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #145968 (Add `Bound::copied`)
 - #146046 (Suggest method name with maybe ty mismatch)
 - #146051 (Change std f32 test to pass under Miri)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2025
Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #145421 (`dump_mir` cleanups)
 - #145968 (Add `Bound::copied`)
 - #146004 (resolve: Refactor `struct ExternPreludeEntry`)
 - #146042 (Detect negative literal inferred to unsigned integer)
 - #146046 (Suggest method name with maybe ty mismatch)
 - #146051 (Change std f32 test to pass under Miri)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 0dbd8e6 into rust-lang:master Sep 1, 2025
10 checks passed
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2025
Rollup merge of #146051 - LorrensP-2158466:miri-libstd-fix, r=RalfJung

Change std f32 test to pass under Miri

Adds `APPROX_DELTA` to 2 tests of `f32::log` reported in [#miri > Miri test-libstd Failure (2025-08)](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/269128-miri/topic/Miri.20test-libstd.20Failure.20.282025-08.29).

I changed 2 lines, the first one is the actual failure. The second one is precautionary.
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.91.0 milestone Sep 1, 2025
github-actions bot pushed a commit to model-checking/verify-rust-std that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2025
…r=RalfJung

Change std f32 test to pass under Miri

Adds `APPROX_DELTA` to 2 tests of `f32::log` reported in [#miri > Miri test-libstd Failure (2025-08)](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/269128-miri/topic/Miri.20test-libstd.20Failure.20.282025-08.29).

I changed 2 lines, the first one is the actual failure. The second one is precautionary.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants