Use shorthand initialization in rustdoc #65155
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@bors r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit c087111 has been approved by |
tmandry
added a commit
to tmandry/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 6, 2019
…acrum Use shorthand initialization in rustdoc This just fixes a few lints I rust-analyzer was showing. Is this sort of PR useful? Should the lints be fixed as apart of the otherwise unrelated PR I was working on?
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 6, 2019
Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - #65095 (Sort error codes in librustc_passes) - #65101 (Upgrade librustc_macros dependencies) - #65142 (Ensure that associated `async fn`s have unique fresh param names) - #65155 (Use shorthand initialization in rustdoc) - #65158 (Remove dead module) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This just fixes a few lints I rust-analyzer was showing. Is this sort of PR useful? Should the lints be fixed as apart of the otherwise unrelated PR I was working on?