PR #7637 followup: no need to print the set of removed files twice. #7877
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Landing with #7897. |
flip1995
pushed a commit
to flip1995/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 23, 2021
[`swap`] lints now check if there is `no_std` or `no_core` attribute Closes rust-lang#7858 changelog: [`swap`] lints now check if there is `no_std` or `no_core` attribute
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
trivial r? for anyone who agrees with me. :)
Given the choice between
I originally chose (3.) since it seemed safest to be loud about this. But now that I've used it for a bit, I think (1.) would suffice.