Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Fix suggestion to introduce explicit lifetime #81995

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 13, 2021
Merged

Fix suggestion to introduce explicit lifetime #81995

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
788e4bb
Fix suggestion to introduce explicit lifetime
0yoyoyo Feb 11, 2021
fcce998
Add nll test
0yoyoyo Feb 12, 2021
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Prev Previous commit
Add nll test
  • Loading branch information
@0yoyoyo
0yoyoyo committed Feb 12, 2021
commit fcce998d564678d7736f8382861f0fbb5e549dd2
17 changes: 17 additions & 0 deletions src/test/ui/suggestions/lifetimes/missing-lifetimes-in-signature-2.nll.stderr
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
error[E0311]: the parameter type `T` may not live long enough
--> $DIR/missing-lifetimes-in-signature-2.rs:20:5
|
LL | / foo.bar(move |_| {
LL | |
LL | | t.test();
LL | | });
| |______^
|
note: the parameter type `T` must be valid for the anonymous lifetime #2 defined on the function body at 19:1...
--> $DIR/missing-lifetimes-in-signature-2.rs:19:1
|
LL | fn func<T: Test>(foo: &Foo, t: T) {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

error: aborting due to previous error